Daring Fireball 09月29日
macOS 26 Tahoe Utility Icons
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

macOS 26 Tahoe introduces new icons for utility apps, replacing the existing ones with designs that are criticized for their poor aesthetics and lack of functionality. The icons follow a 'wrench' motif, with limited space for app identification, leading to unrecognizable symbols. Examples include Disk Utility's Apple logo, Expansion Slot Utility's empty slots, and AppleScript Utility's poorly oriented scroll. The design choices are seen as a decline in Apple's attention to detail and visual design standards.

🔧 The new icons for macOS 26 Tahoe utility apps are criticized for their poor design and lack of functionality, using a 'wrench' motif that limits app identification.

🖥️ Disk Utility's icon features an Apple logo instead of recognizable disk-related imagery, making it difficult to identify the app's purpose.

🛠️ Expansion Slot Utility's new icon displays empty slots, failing to represent the app's functionality for Mac Pros, which are the only Macs with expansion slots.

📜 AppleScript Utility's icon includes a scroll representing AppleScript, but it is poorly oriented, deviating from the canonical orientation seen in SF Symbols and script application icons.

🎨 The overall design of the icons is seen as a decline in Apple's attention to detail and visual design standards, with some comparing them to the work of untrained designers.

MacOS has shipped with a collection of “utility” apps since the prehistoric era of classic Mac OS. A good rule of thumb for what makes an app a “utility” is that it’s a tool for doing something to or about your computer. Ever since Mac OS X 10.0, most of these apps have been neatly filed away in /Applications/Utilities/. Others — some because they’re obscure (e.g. Ticket Viewer), some because they’re effectively deprecated (e.g. DVD Player, whose copyright date in MacOS 15 Sequoia is 2019), and some because they present themselves, when launched, not as apps but as system-level features (e.g. About This Mac) — are tucked away in /System/Library/CoreServices/ or /System/Library/CoreServices/Applications/.

Basic Apple Guy posted a screenshot to Mastodon comparing the current MacOS 15 icons for four of these utilities (Disk Utility, Expansion Slot Utility, Wireless Diagnostics, and AppleScript Utility) to their new icons in MacOS 26 Tahoe, beta 7 (click to enlarge for detail):

I don’t think the old icons for these apps from MacOS 15 were particularly good — Apple has mostly lost its “icons look cool” game. But the new ones in MacOS 26 Tahoe are objectively terrible. The only one of this bunch that’s maybe sort of OK is Wireless Diagnostics. They all look like placeholder icons made by a developer who would be the first to admit that they’re not an artist. Disk Utility, which is an important app, doesn’t even look like it involves a disk.

These new icons all use the same “wrench” motif, which is a lazy, limiting concept to start with. Tahoe, at the system level, enforces a squircle shape on all application icons. Apps that haven’t been updated with Tahoe-compliant everything-fits-in-a-squircle icons are put in “squircle jail” — their non-Tahoe-compliant icons are shrunk and placed atop a drab gray Tahoe squircle background, to force them into squircle compliance. But these Apple utility apps have an entire sub-motif — inside their base squircle shape is a large wrench fitted against a bolt. Only inside the bolt — which is inside the wrench’s jaws, which wrench is inside the squircle — goes the part of the icon that identifies the app itself. So maybe like 10 percent of the area of the icon is the area where the app can show something that identifies its purpose.

So the entire concept for these icons sucks. But the conceptual execution sucks too. The wrench is incredibly stupid-looking. Whoever drew it has obviously never used an open-end wrench because the jaws on the wrench head are way too thin. They’d break off under any significant torque. Just look at a real-life wrench, or just look at the wrench heads in the older MacOS icons (or Apple’s 🔧 emoji, for that matter).

Individually the icons mostly suck too:

These are the not the work of carpenters who care about the backs of the cabinets they’re building. These icons are so bad, they look like the work of untrained “How hard can it be?” dilettante carpenters who only last a few days on the job before sawing off one of their own fingers. The whole collection looks like the work from someone with no artistic ability nor an eye for detail. From Apple, of all companies.

Is it a big deal in the grand scheme of things that the icons for these seldom-used utility apps have gone to shit? No. But consider the proverbial canary in a coal mine. The problem isn’t that one little bird has died. The problem is that the bird might be dead because the whole mine is filling with deadly carbon monoxide or highly flammable methane gas. The icons in /Applications/Utilities/ in MacOS 26 Tahoe represent a folder full of dead canaries.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

macOS 26 Tahoe Utility Icons Apple Design Icon Criticism Visual Design
相关文章