少点错误 11月13日 07:08
“Favor”硬币:时间、信任与社群经济的实验
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文深入探讨了“Favor”硬币这一独特社群经济实验的核心理念、运作机制及发展历程。作者回顾了Favor硬币的起源、设计初衷以及其作为一种稀缺性主张的价值体现,即代表着作者个人一天的时间和努力。文章详细阐述了Favor硬币的实际使用方式,强调其促进大规模多方交易和社群连接的重要性。同时,作者也坦诚了实验过程中遇到的挑战,包括概念理解偏差、流通速度不足以及运营的复杂性。最后,作者展望了Favor经济的未来规划,并分享了该实验在微观经济现象观察及个人经验积累方面的意义。

💰 **Favor硬币的价值主张**:Favor硬币并非普通货币,而是代表着作者个人一天的时间、努力、关注和技能。其核心价值在于对作者稀缺个人资源的声索,旨在承认并量化一份深厚的情感或感激之情,并为这种非物质的“债务”提供了一个具体的衡量标准。

🔄 **促进社群交易与流通**:Favor硬币的设计目标是促进那些通常难以发生的、大规模多方之间的交易。作者强调了其“流通速度”的重要性,鼓励用户大胆使用Favor硬币作为一种工具,促成可能性的实现,而非将其视为收藏品或饰品。

💎 **双重价值支撑与风险规避**:Favor硬币的价值由两部分支撑:一是作者的个人时间与技能,二是硬币本身的贵金属价值(约7克纯银的熔炼价值)以及作者个人储蓄的百分之一。这种双重保障为持有者提供了一个“逃生舱”,即使在其他价值丧失的情况下也能有所保障。

💡 **精心设计的社群经济实验**:Favor硬币的实验在于将非正式的赠予经济与市场经济的元素相结合,通过增加明确的价值尺度、流通性和支撑,来解锁更多潜在的社群交易,并提升社会交往的整体流动性,从而更紧密地连接人与人。

🚧 **面临的挑战与反思**:实验过程中,作者也遇到了概念传播困难、用户理解偏差(如被误解为时间货币化或金融欺诈)、硬币未被有效流通以及运营复杂性等问题,这些都促使作者对社群经济的实施和设计进行反思。

Published on November 12, 2025 11:02 PM GMT


 


It’s been almost exactly seven years since I spent the first Favor - a placeholder copper disk hand-marked with letterform stamps - on laptop repairs, thanks to SN, over six years since the chilly December night when I completed the first investment cast to forge the first silver Favor coins, and roughly five years since I wrote up the draft explanation of the Favor economy that still lives at lorx.us/favor . I think it’s well past time to provide a more succinct explanation, as well as to talk a little bit about my process, what’s gone well, what’s gone badly, and my future plans for the Favor economy. In a future post I’ll discuss the nanoscale reserve banking aspect more, as well as giving a perspective on a strange kind of sculpture I haven’t much shared, and some case studies of Favor use.

I’ll start with an explanation of what a Favor coin is, what they represent, and how best to use them. A Favor coin is a small coin as pictured above, made out of a special kind of sterling silver that tarnishes more slowly. It’s roughly an inch across, masses about 6 grams, has a large square hole in the center, and bears a design in common with all other Favor coins - a value design on the obverse and a QR code on the reverse. They represent a claim on something permanently scarce: the elevator pitch for what they represent is that in the common sentiment that “I owe you one”, they are the ones that you literally owe; the simplest concrete version of what that means is that it represents a claim to a day of my personal time - my effort, attention, skilled labor, good will, and so on. In practice, this is still slightly too facile and too strict; for obvious reasons I don’t keep exacting account of how much time I spend with people I like towards purposes important to them, so that instead in usual use it represents the ability to claim a day’s worth of my time and effort specifically when that time and effort are relatively scarce, or to ask me to cancel a prior plan at need on some specific day. Note that this is a day’s worth of my effort, and not necessarily any given eight hours of work: depending on intensity, suitability, and timing, it could reasonably end up being cashed in for anywhere from an hour to twenty hours of my time - in the former case, some brief and high-stakes task, and in the latter case, something more like an hour of math tutoring every week for a few months. In sum, a Favor coin acknowledges some major debt of gratitude that I owe to someone which I want to be sure not to simply let fade away, and gives a fairly clear benchmark value for that gratitude; the first kind of wealth that Favors are backed by are my own scarce time and skillful effort.

As for how best to use them, the important thing is to use them at all. Be willing to accept them from others and not just me, as is my explicit intent. They aren’t jewelry: keep them moving if at all possible, and if you can’t, redeem them or sell them back to me so that I can move them along instead. The whole point of the project is to try to coordinate massively multiparty trades that would never otherwise take place, so the velocity of a Favor is of foremost importance; to date there have been 68 Favors put into circulation, enabling perhaps some 200 trades, but this is far fewer than I had hoped! Make bigger and stranger asks of your friends; use a Favor boldly as a tool that permits the otherwise impossible, not least because I’ve spent meaningful thought on how best to make the mechanism design robust.

On that note, I naturally want for people who might end up with these but who might not think themselves best served by the experiment to have an escape hatch. This is the second kind of wealth that Favors are backed by - 1/1000 of my own personal savings, whatever that might be, plus the melt value of the coin when treated as ~7 grams of pure silver. The silver itself, which as I’ll mention later is not the primary point as a store of value, nevertheless acts as a final last-ditch store of value should all else fail, though I claim that if all else has in fact failed, we probably have bigger problems to deal with.

For some slightly more esoteric aspects of Favors, I should mention both the part about legible affordances for gift economies and the part about phenomenological binding to coinness. A key aspect of the project is to be an experiment in what happens when you take some existing informal gift economy - like the casual modes of illegible exchange common to overlapping social networks - and append (for the benefit of well-liked acquaintances!) a simple affordance that adds some amount of legibility and permanency, some amount of backing, and a fixed unit of account and exchange, in a way that looks more like a market economy’s emphasis on velocity of money and slightly more careful tracking of exchanges and debts. The goal here is complex: to unlock additional trades that might never otherwise take place, to asynchronously coordinate multiparty trades as counterweighted by cycles of Favor exchanges, and to increase overall net liquidity of social exchanges; in sum, to more closely connect people already acquainted with each other and to enrich all involved in hard-to-measure ways.

Another key aspect of the project is the strong design language patterned after that of the existing coinage of nation-states. The thought here was to dodge a failure mode of other similar projects I’ve heard of, where the cheapness of the material - printer paper, say - led to a sort of psychological devaluation and lack of respect. I knew I’d need for people to treat them as actual semi-serious coinage, and that meant getting people to read them as coins - to get them to tightly phenomenologically bind the objects to the reference class of “official coinage”. I spent a while looking at dimensions of common coins that felt especially resonant when in initial design phases; similarly my choice of silver for a material, which despite being much less expensive than you might expect retains its cultural cachet as a clear second only to gold as an obvious material to make something like money out of - especially a special form of sterling silver! Likewise the design joke inherent to the form: as far as I know, no other coin has both reeded edges and square holes in the middle, aspects of coin design from very different monetary traditions and with very different intended purposes: reeded edges from Western traditions to detect illicit filing away of precious metals, and square holes from East Asian traditions to permit turning on a lathe. Neither of these are directly relevant to me, though the reeded edges are pleasant to touch and the squares are convenient for threading on a necklace - again, the main point is to get people to read them intuitively as some kind of unfamiliar coinage, which in my experience I’ve thankfully achieved. I’ve heard people understand them as anything from “anime money” to “kinda like the John Wick coins” to “weird solarpunk future tokens”. Regrettably, the QR code has put people in mind of cryptocurrency, which I’ve been only too happy to correct them on. Likewise the ornateness of the design, and the use of numbers and multilinguistic text - the aim is to get people to understand these objects as definitively coins, and not washers or scrap or jewelry.

Now for some drawbacks. Many people haven’t particularly understood the idea, rounding it off to monetizing my time, to excessively scrutinizingly tracking the balance of value in a friendship, or to some variety of weird securities fraud. As the above hopefully makes clear, the project is none of these. What’s more, many people I know have found the coins themselves delightful enough to want to keep around as trinkets, rather than actually making use of them; in principle that’d be fine but in practice it just amounts to giant amounts of deadweight on the economy that threatens some future liquidity crisis. In the same vein but less prosaically, it turns out that running your own reserve bank, without most of the affordances or measures of a properly sovereign economy, by hand… is hard, actually? Even trying to run a loose money policy to drive higher velocity of Favors means having to run many more investment casts. As a minor drawback, good investment casting are themselves pretty hard to come by, and having my pseudocurrency partially pegged to the value of a precious metal means that I have logistics difficulties when the price of silver rises - for me, it’s not an investment, but a crafting material!

Lastly, what are my plans for the future of the Favor economy? Mostly, to remain in approximately steady state for the foreseeable future; perhaps after a decade has passed I’ll look at winding the experiment down. I’ve drawn up plans for smaller change - a smaller half-Favor in silver, a tenth-Favor in brass, and a twelfth-Favor in bronze, given that a full day of time is often too large to reasonably trade around, especially for the intended purpose of intra-social group trades and asks. In the meantime, I’ve already made my business cards be sixtieth-Favors, exchangeable for eight minutes’ worth of my time and effort, but only saleable if properly authenticated with MD5 hash. Apart from that, who knows what the future brings? The Favor economy is ultimately a hobbyist experiment in alternative macroeconomics; a vision of a possible relatively pleasant future, where the scarcest thing around is a friend’s time and skilled effort. I can only keep hoping that others take up the call and instantiate more of that future, just as I once hoped they would.

 

 

 

Here are a few short extra bits about Lorxus Favors that I don’t think I’ve shared much elsewhere and certainly have never written down.

(What Favors get exchanged for) Here are a few of the things I’ve spent Favors on, or that I’ve heard of others spending Favors on: Laptop repairs, driving for multiple hours to events and bulk grocery stores, help accessing medical care, willingness to make fair-sized (USD) loans, car jumpstarting, ritual work and organization, furniture assembly, purchase of antiques, gambling stakes, temporary housing, small coding projects, specialty silverwork, metalcasting help, and community organization. This is obviously not remotely a complete list, and I probably can’t put a complete list together, but this is the cross-section of Favor economy activity of which word has made it back to me.

(4D sculpture) I have this mental image of what the kinetic sculpture comprised of all the silver alloy that has ever been in a Favor coin must look like. If we take as read the block universe model of time - at least for the past - and also adopt for convenience the inertial frame of the Earth, then the surface of the Earth traces out a near-perfect spherinder. Within this spherinder, Favor coins bloom yellow-hot now and again, visible in bunches within their plaster shells as they cool and are quenched; then are clipped free of each other, a few stray motes of silver remaining on the floor and workbenches. Chicago is a distinguished point from which all Favor coins to date originate, tracing out the very start of a treelike graph. They spread out from there; many to Seattle and to the Chicagoland area; others to San Francisco or upstate New York or to central New Jersey. Some make it as far as Germany or South Korea. I myself am visible by implication in the sculpture from the thick bunches of Favors sitting in reserve, or most especially by a few strung on a chain necklace, tracking my motions carefully. Other people who are important to me become briefly visible; some fade away in time, while others remain visible in much the same way. Loops and consistent arcs and cycles emerge, the record of socialization and coordination and a gentle sort of trade. Some make their way back to the central mass I carry; others sit in drawers, never seeing the light of day. Moment by moment, more of the sculpture comes into view, some of it becoming slowly tarnished or quickly polished; the tree of silver grows and diffuses upwards through the growing spherinder as time passes.

(Nanoscale reserve banking) Consider the following premises. First, the fact that just as the Fed is the final sovereign authority over the US Dollar, so too am I the final sovereign authority over the favor. Second, that there is some actual quantity of money that the Fed exercises that sovereignty over; there’s some subtlety in how to define that, but for a decent approximation, the M1 supply - the literal total monetary-mass of physical currency, plus savings accounts and some other minor components - is ~$20Tn as of 2024, somewhat less than the 2024 GDP of ~$30Tn. Third, there is a USD-denominated quantity of economic mass that I exercise sovereignty over through the Lorxus Favor economy; there’s also some subtlety in how to define that, but for a quick pair of bounding estimates, there are 77 Favor coins in existence (of which 68 are in circulation) as of 2025; the floor value is currently ~$85 and eight hours’ worth of highly skilled work might reasonably expect to be paid $400, giving bounds of ~$6.5k to ~$31k, averaging out to ~$18.7k - that is, pretty much exactly 1/10^9 the amount of economic mass of the US Dollar economy. That makes me a nanoscale reserve bank(er). Many macroeconomic phenomena show up in this tiny scale model of an economy - helicopter money is an experiment I’ve tried with some success, savings sitting around inflict major deadweight loss, and I’ve observed a very rough power law in the number of transactions per person. I can tell you from personal experience that running a reserve bank is quite challenging, especially without full-time staff, added logistical constraints, fewer legal affordances, much less chartalist sway, next to no meaningful banking, much less information, and the need to set economic policy by hand and in large blocks as compared to a major national reserve bank, but it’s been a satisfying experiment nonetheless. At the least, I can appreciate counterintuitive-looking economic measures the Fed takes, and equally well criticize a certain AG for gross incompetence with the weight of nonzero experience.


 



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Favor硬币 社群经济 时间货币 信任机制 去中心化金融 实验经济学 Favor Coins Community Economics Time Currency Trust Mechanism Decentralized Finance Experimental Economics
相关文章