New Yorker 11月09日 19:44
聚光灯下的脆弱:明星、公关与婚姻的真相
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

这篇文章深入探讨了明星台前幕后的生活,揭示了公众往往不了解的脆弱性。通过演员的视角,展现了公关在明星生活中扮演的保护角色,以及这种保护如何塑造了明星的个性和处事方式。文章还探讨了婚姻关系中的复杂性,以电影《Is This Thing On?》为例,展现了一对夫妻在面临分离时的 ambivalence 和寻找自我的过程,强调了在维系关系前首先要认识自己的重要性。同时,也侧面反映了长期婚姻中,夫妻之间如何逐渐疏远和失去沟通。

🛡️ 公关角色的双刃剑:公关人员常常为明星设立界限,这在保护明星的同时,也可能阻碍他们发展自我保护意识和直面真实世界的能力,导致一种被过度保护的“孩子气”的脆弱。

🎭 明星光环下的脆弱性:公众往往看不到明星光鲜外表下的脆弱。长期的保护可能使一些明星保持天真,而另一些则可能因为习惯于被照顾而缺乏独立处理问题的能力。

💔 婚姻关系的复杂性与分离:电影《Is This Thing On?》并非典型的离婚电影,而是一部关于“分离”的影片,展现了夫妻在尚未走到法律程序前的犹豫和对婚姻是否真正结束的 ambivalence,以及在分离过程中重新找回自我的主题。

🗣️ 长期婚姻中的迷失与沟通缺失:长达二十多年的婚姻中,夫妻之间如何逐渐失去共同语言、不再坦诚面对彼此的需求是一个难以简单解释的过程。即使存在明显的导火索,也难以完全概括婚姻破裂的真正原因,深层次的原因在于日积月累的沟通不畅和自我认知的迷失。

🏐 个人成长先于关系维系:电影的核心在于,在能够真正维系一段关系之前,个体需要先找到自己的方向和真正的自我。片中角色通过各自的方式重新认识自己,为关系修复提供了新的可能。

The publicist often has the boundaries that the movie star either doesn’t know how to have or doesn’t want to come off as having. I started at eleven, so I didn’t know how to say to an adult interviewing me, “I’d rather not talk about that.” I needed a grownup in the room. But sometimes you never develop your boundaries, because there’s always someone doing that for you. [Jay Kelly] is not an obvious narcissist, but he is a child who’s had other people be on the front lines for him.

Not to get even more inside baseball, but your character’s name is Liz. Noah and Greta Gerwig and Emily Mortimer, who also co-wrote the screenplay, all share a publicist named Liz Mahoney. Did you have a sense that you were playing her? Did you talk to her about this character?

I spent so much time with Liz and Annett and Lisa Taback [at Netflix]. There’s no way I’m not drawing on the way they protect their clients. They all have very different ways of doing it. The thing I love about Liz is that she’s just so dry.

The real Liz?

The real Liz. And the character Liz has that in her nature, that very direct quality that a lot of publicists have. You’d think a publicist is a “yes” person to their client, but the publicists I’ve known tell you the truth. Like, “No, this is a disaster. You’ve got to go this way.” It’s not like I needed to do research. I’ve spent my whole life with them, and my friends’ publicists, and boyfriends’ publicists, and best friends’ publicists, including Liz, because I’ve spent so much time with Noah and Greta.

You’ve seen the machinery of stardom from the inside your entire life. Is there something that this movie is revealing that people generally don’t understand about what’s underneath the hood?

Vulnerability is a trait that is not talked about in the iconography of a famous person. Some people can almost have a childlike, almost innocent vulnerability, because they’ve had people protecting them their whole lives. That is not George. George is astute and very honest, radically loyal, totally there for the people he loves, a very different kind of person. Jay misses it all. Liz never says, “The reviews are a disaster. They hate the film. One person said you’re handsome but not very good.” He’s almost seeing what’s going on, but we have protected him to a fault. It wasn’t what he wished for, but it’s what we thought our job was. I even reference it when I’m, like, “It was so great when we were young. He was our baby.” Until he grew up needing so much that we couldn’t have our own lives.

Right. They’re kind of like parents, best friends, and servants all at the same time.

And I’ve seen it plenty. I’ve been at a festival where Annett and I are having dinner, and another client has just arrived, and the mistreatment [of her] is very loud. The demands, or the way someone communicates to their team. There are a million ways to live your life, but one choice is to do it with gratitude.

Let’s move on to “Is This Thing On?” Unlike “Marriage Story,” which is really a divorce movie, I would call this a separation movie. These two characters are not at the point of lawyers yet, and there’s an ambivalence about whether their marriage is really over. How did you and Bradley Cooper and Will Arnett talk about that?

Will knew the story that inspired this film. A comedian in England, John Bishop, and his wife went through a version of this. Through the process of their separation, they both found their way back to themselves. For him, it was through standup. And, in fact, she did get invited to a comedy club and was sitting in the audience, when her soon-to-be ex-husband stood up. He had never told her. She didn’t know this was an interest of his. There he was, and he talks about the things he talks about in the movie and then says, “I miss my wife.”

The version I saw yesterday ended with the credit “Inspired by a true story,” which made me wonder, Whose story is this?

Yeah, and John has a credit on the film. He had a miserable job in pharmaceuticals and now is this huge comedian. That inspiration was what started the journey for Will, and then Will gave it to Bradley. And Bradley fell in love with the idea of a love story that’s about how you have to find your way to yourself before you can ever find the core of a relationship. That’s when the three of us started to dive in. It’s not a very typical female role, someone who is always pragmatic, always clear: “Here are the rules, here are the boundaries.” Usually, with characters I’ve played, I’m so deeply in the emotion of it. But pro athletes are trained in that win-lose [mentality], and volleyball is a game of strategy. It’s so different from the way my brain works.

Right, your character, Tess, is a former Olympic volleyball player. All this precedes the start of the movie, as does the marriage that we’re watching crater, similar to “Marriage Story.” That seems challenging as an actor, to have to start your story at a place where so much has happened. Did you create an entire history of this relationship with Will and Bradley?

Emotionally, we were very specific. We spent really deep, intimate, emotional time together on who we are as characters, as people. What we brought to the love story. What we fell in love with, or thought we were in love with. How we grew away from ourselves, becoming responsible adults. Giving up the job. Kids come. And, one day, a marriage is over. It’s funny—when people talk about marriages, they’re, like, “What happened?” Does anybody know, really? Even when it’s, like, “There was an affair” or “They lost their job and got depressed”—that’s still not what happened. When you’re looking at twenty-plus year marriages, you don’t even understand how you lose each other. How you lose your way. How you stop being honest with yourself about what you need. How you stop talking to each other.

And so we shared a lot privately, all three of us, about our lifetimes, about the history of these characters, so that, in a scene that says nothing about the history, you can hopefully feel the history. There are scenes when we hurt each other, where it may not even make sense. You feel the idea, but you don’t totally get it. And that’s intentional, because the characters don’t. Why are these people fighting over the way she dropped the kids off at the thing?

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

明星 公关 婚姻 脆弱性 自我认知
相关文章
谦虚不是把自己想得很糟,而是完全不想自己。 -卢维斯定理
前华为公关副总裁 前百度公关副总裁 5条内容获得全网百亿观看讨论 被CNN、彭博、BI、FT、BBC连环报道的女人 这些title多适合做自媒体IP搞私董会啊,从来不休息每...
你以为的大厂 PR:高级策略,多层工具,多方人脉的连接,舆情控制,热点引导。 真正的大厂 PR:画小人诅咒你。
百度副总裁的事儿挺火... 璩(qu)静凭借她自己的暴论短视频火上了几轮微博热搜,不近人情差点成了百度的“企业文化”,各种关于她的传播爆料齐出,经常被人们不...
Are Journalists Falling Short of AI Adoption Trends? Yes– Says Cision
在我当下的认知中,如果孙俪没有撒谎他和邓超之间的情况,这段描述确实接近了现代成年人的婚姻的本质了,在双方都想维持住婚姻关系的前提下,这可能就是最优解。...
我有一个想法:谈恋爱应该先结婚,框住两个人不会分手,一有问题只能去解决去处理,然后慢慢培养感情,新鲜感也不会褪去的太快。
相识7年,结婚5年,好像没有以前那么多要聊的话题了。 我们都被手机分散了太多精力;我们经常被工作搞得心情不佳;每天晚上到家,除了做饭吃饭、看电视,好像也...
昨天小柴刷朋友圈的时候我正好看到了 “诶那是谁订婚了?” “他呀,xxx,他可不容易了,和他女朋友大学就开始谈了,谈了四年吧” 他边说边点开每一张图仔细看 ...
吵架,真不是两个人在吵,实则是六个人在吵。 真正的你,你眼里的你,ta眼里的你。 真正的ta,ta眼里的ta,你眼里的ta。