TechCrunch News 前天 06:51
人工智能发展面临电力瓶颈,算力与能源需求失衡
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman 和微软 CEO Satya Nadella 都承认,当前人工智能发展面临着一个严峻的问题:电力需求。尽管科技公司一直在竞相购买GPU以提升算力,但电力基础设施的建设速度远未能跟上。微软甚至面临着拥有大量芯片却苦于没有足够的电力供应来运行的困境。Nadella指出,现在最大的问题不是算力过剩,而是电力和数据中心建设的速度无法满足需求。这种算力先行、电力滞后的局面,反映出习惯于快速迭代的软件和芯片公司在面对建设周期长、规模庞大的能源基础设施时所面临的挑战。美国过去十年的电力需求平稳,但近五年数据中心的需求急剧增加,超出了电力公司的规划。一些数据中心开始采用“表后”供电模式,绕过电网直接获取电力。Altman 警告称,如果未来出现大规模且廉价的能源,可能会使签订现有电力合同的公司面临巨大损失。他同时认为,技术进步带来的单位智能成本的显著降低,将以前所未有的速度推高能源需求。

💡算力与电力需求失衡:尽管科技公司积极采购GPU提升人工智能算力,但电力基础设施的建设速度未能同步跟上,导致出现拥有大量算力芯片却缺乏足够电力支持的局面。

🏢数据中心电力需求激增:过去十年美国电力需求平稳,但近五年数据中心对电力的需求显著增加,超出了现有电力供应的规划和建设速度。

⚡能源获取模式创新:为满足快速增长的电力需求,一些数据中心开始采用“表后”供电模式,直接从发电端获取电力,绕过传统电网。

☢️对未来能源的押注与风险:Altman 投资核能和太阳能等前沿能源技术,但这些技术短期内难以大规模部署;同时,他警告未来廉价能源的出现可能使现有电力合同面临风险。

📈Jevons 悖论的影响:Altman 认为,随着人工智能计算成本的持续降低和效率的提高,将刺激对算力的更大需求,从而进一步推高整体能源消耗,符合杰文斯悖论的预测。

How much power is enough for AI? Nobody knows, not even OpenAI CEO Sam Altman or Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella.

That has put software-first businesses like OpenAI and Microsoft in a bind. Much of the tech world has been focused on compute as a major barrier to AI deployment. And while tech companies have been racing to secure power, those efforts have lagged GPU purchases to the point where Microsoft has apparently ordered too many chips for the amount of power it has contracted.

“The cycles of demand and supply in this particular case you can’t really predict,” Nadella said on the BG2 podcast. “The biggest issue we are now having is not a compute glut, but it’s a power and it’s sort of the ability to get the [data center] builds done fast enough close to power.”

“If you can’t do that, you may actually have a bunch of chips sitting in inventory that I can’t plug in. In fact, that is my problem today. It’s not a supply issue of chips, it’s the fact that I don’t have warm shells to plug into,” Nadella added, referring to the commercial real estate term for buildings ready for tenants.

In some ways, we’re seeing what happens when companies accustomed to dealing with silicon and code, two technologies that scale and deploy quickly compared with massive power plants, need to ramp up their efforts in the energy world.

For more than a decade, electricity demand in the U.S. was flat. But over the last five years, demand from data centers has begun to ramp up, outpacing utilities’ plans for new generating capacity. That has led data center developers to add power in so-called behind-the-meter arrangements, where electricity is fed directly to the data center, skipping the grid.

Altman, who was also on the podcast, thinks that trouble could be brewing: “If a very cheap form of energy comes online soon at mass scale, then a lot of people are going to be extremely burned with existing contracts they’ve signed.”

Techcrunch event

San Francisco | October 13-15, 2026

“If we can continue this unbelievable reduction in cost per unit of intelligence — let’s say it’s been averaging like 40x for a given level per year — you know, that’s like a very scary exponent from an infrastructure buildout standpoint,” he said.

Altman has invested in nuclear energy, including fission startup Oklo and fusion startup Helion, along with Exowatt, a solar startup that concentrates the Sun’s heat and stores it for later use.

None of those are ready for widespread deployment today, though, and fossil-based technologies like natural gas power plants take years to build. Plus, orders placed today for new gas turbine likely won’t get fulfilled until later this decade.

That’s partially why tech companies have been adding solar at a rapid clip, drawn to the technology’s inexpensive cost, emissions-free power, and ability to deploy rapidly.

There might be subconscious factors at play, too. Photovoltaic solar is in many ways a parallel technology to semiconductors, and one that has been derisked and commoditized. Both PV solar and semiconductors are built on silicon substrates, and both roll off production lines as modular components that can be packaged together and tied into parallel arrays that make the completed part more powerful than any individual module.

Because of solar’s modularity and speed of deployment, the pace of construction is much closer to that of a data center.

But both still take time to build, and demand can change much more quickly than either a data center or solar project can be completed. Altman admitted that if AI gets more efficient or if demand doesn’t grow as he expects, some companies might be saddled with idled power plants. 

But from his other comments, he doesn’t seem to think that’s likely. Instead, he appears to be a firm believer in Jevons Paradox, which says that more efficient use of a resource will lead to greater use, increasing overall demand.

“If the price of compute per like unit of intelligence or whatever — however you want to think about it — fell by a factor of a 100 tomorrow, you would see usage go up by much more than 100 and there’d be a lot of things that people would love to do with that compute that just make no economic sense at the current cost,” Altman said.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI power data center energy demand Jevons Paradox Sam Altman
相关文章