The case against pgvector (via) I wasn't keen on the title of this piece but the content is great: Alex Jacobs talks through lessons learned trying to run the popular pgvector PostgreSQL vector indexing extension at scale, in particular the challenges involved in maintaining a large index with close-to-realtime updates using the IVFFlat or HNSW index types.

The section on pre-v.s.-post filtering is particularly useful:

Okay but let's say you solve your index and insert problems. Now you have a document search system with millions of vectors. Documents have metadata---maybe they're marked as draft, published, or archived. A user searches for something, and you only want to return published documents.

[...] should Postgres filter on status first (pre-filter) or do the vector search first and then filter (post-filter)?

This seems like an implementation detail. It’s not. It’s the difference between queries that take 50ms and queries that take 5 seconds. It’s also the difference between returning the most relevant results and… not.

The Hacker News thread for this article attracted a robust discussion, including some fascinating comments by Discourse developer Rafael dos Santos Silva (xfalcox) about how they are using pgvector at scale:

We [run pgvector in production] at Discourse, in thousands of databases, and it's leveraged in most of the billions of page views we serve. [...]

Also worth mentioning that we use quantization extensively:

halfvec (16bit float) for storage - bit (binary vectors) for indexes

Which makes the storage cost and on-going performance good enough that we could enable this in all our hosting. [...]

In Discourse embeddings power:

Related Topics, a list of topics to read next, which uses embeddings of the current topic as the key to search for similar onesSuggesting tags and categories when composing a new topicAugmented searchRAG for uploaded files