The Verge - Artificial Intelligences 前天 20:00
谷歌因AI模型Gemma编造指控而移除
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

谷歌从其AI Studio平台移除了AI模型Gemma,原因是共和党参议员Marsha Blackburn投诉该模型编造了关于她的严重刑事指控。Gemma是专为开发者设计的AI模型,而AI Studio是面向开发者的平台,并非普通消费者访问谷歌AI模型的常规方式。谷歌表示,Gemma从未打算作为消费工具使用,或用于回答事实性问题。为了防止这种混淆,对Gemma的访问不再在AI Studio上提供,但仍可通过API供开发者使用。

🔍 谷歌移除了AI模型Gemma,原因是该模型编造了关于参议员Marsha Blackburn的严重刑事指控。Gemma是专为开发者设计的AI模型,而AI Studio是面向开发者的平台,并非普通消费者访问谷歌AI模型的常规方式。

🚫 谷歌表示,Gemma从未打算作为消费工具使用,或用于回答事实性问题。为了防止这种混淆,对Gemma的访问不再在AI Studio上提供,但仍可通过API供开发者使用。

🗣️ 参议员Marsha Blackburn在信中表示:“直到你能控制它,就关闭它。”这反映了对AI模型准确性和控制问题的担忧,尽管生成式AI已经发展了几年,但AI模型与真相的关系仍然复杂。

Google says it has pulled AI model Gemma from its AI Studio platform after a Republican senator complained the model, designed for developers, “fabricated serious criminal allegations” about her. 

In a post on X, Google’s official news account said the company had “seen reports of non-developers trying to use Gemma in AI Studio and ask it factual questions.” AI Studio is a platform for developers and not a conventional way for regular consumers to access Google’s AI models. Gemma is specifically billed as a family of AI models for developers to use, with variants for medical use, coding, and evaluating text and image content.

Gemma was never meant to be used as a consumer tool, or to be used to answer factual questions, Google said. “To prevent this confusion, access to Gemma is no longer available on AI Studio. It is still available to developers through the API.”

Google did not specify which reports prompted Gemma’s removal, though on Thursday Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) wrote to CEO Sundar Pichai accusing the company of defamation and anti-conservative bias. Blackburn, who also raised the issue during a recent Senate commerce hearing about anti-diversity activist Robby Starbuck’s own AI defamation suit against Google, claimed Gemma responded falsely when asked “Has Marsha Blackburn been accused of rape?” 

Gemma apparently replied that Blackburn “was accused of having a sexual relationship with a state trooper” during her 1987 campaign for state senate, who alleged “she pressured him to obtain prescription drugs for her and that the relationship involved non-consensual acts.” It also provided a list of fake news articles to support the story, Blackburn said.  

None of this is true, not even the campaign year which was actually 1998. The links lead to error pages and unrelated news articles. There has never been such an accusation, there is no such individual, and there are no such news stories. This is not a harmless “hallucination.” It is an act of defamation produced and distributed by a Google-owned AI model.

The narrative has a familiar feel. Even though we’re now several years into the generative AI boom, AI models still have a complex relationship with the truth. False or misleading answers from AI chatbots masquerading as facts still plague the industry and despite improvements there is no clear solution to the accuracy problem in sight. Google said it remains “committed to minimizing hallucinations and continually improving all our models.”

In her letter, Blackburn said her response remains the same: “Shut it down until you can control it.”

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

谷歌 AI模型 Gemma Marsha Blackburn AI准确性
相关文章