Published on October 22, 2025 6:40 PM GMT
Written in my personal capacity. Thanks to many people for conversations and comments. Written in less than 24 hours; sorry for any sloppiness.
It’s an uncanny, weird coincidence that the two biggest legislative champions for AI safety in the entire country announced their bids for Congress just two days apart. But here we are.
On Monday, I put out a long blog post making the case for donating to Alex Bores, author of the New York RAISE Act. And today I’m doing the exact same thing for Scott Wiener, who announced a run for Congress in California today (October 22).
Much like with Alex Bores, if you’re potentially interested in donating to Wiener, my suggestion would be to:
- Read this post to understand the case for donating to Scott Wiener.Understand that political donations are a matter of public record, and that this may have career implications. Decide if you are willing to donate to Scott Wiener anyway.
- If you’ve already donated to Bores, I think there isn’t much cause for concern, with one exception. If you have the sort of federal policy role where donating against an incumbent might hurt your career, or think there’s a good chance that you will be in such a role in the near future, consider waiting to donate until Nancy Pelosi, the incumbent, announces retirement.
To state my bottom line up front, I think that:
- Marginal donations to Alex Bores still look a bit better than donating to Wiener. If you haven’t yet maxed out to Bores, my recommendation is to do that first.If you have maxed out to Bores, and you are not working in a policy role where donating against an incumbent might hurt your career (and won’t be in the near future), my recommendation would be to donate now (Wednesday, October 22nd) to Wiener.
- However, if you disagree with my modeling assumptions, you might decide that it makes sense to instead wait and only donate if Nancy Pelosi retires.
[Full post incoming; for now, use the link at the top for the full post!]
Discuss
