New Yorker 23小时前
一位女性如何改变西部德州动物收容所的命运
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章讲述了Hall的故事,她如何从一名公共辩护律师,转变为一名全职动物救援者,并创立了One Tail at a Time(OTAT)的西德州分部。Hall最初对管理大量动物的收容所感到担忧,但她看到了改变的潜力。她与一家位于德州Presidio的收容所合作,该收容所此前高达80%的犬只被安乐死,但在她的帮助下,当年实现了零安乐死。Hall意识到,她的目标是提升区域收容所的整体能力,而非仅拯救个别动物。OTAT西德州分部通过提供人员、药品、兽医用品、微芯片和动物追踪软件,并指导收容所进行线上宣传和运输,帮助多个收容所迅速达到“无安乐死”标准,极大地改善了动物福利。

🐾 Hall以其坚定的决心和务实的行动,成功地将濒临绝境的西部德州动物收容所转变为高效、有爱的动物福利中心。她从公共辩护领域跨界而来,创立了One Tail at a Time(OTAT)西德州分部,并致力于提升当地收容所的整体运作能力,而非仅仅是进行临时的动物转移。通过为收容所提供关键资源,如人员支持、医疗物资和先进的动物追踪系统,Hall直接解决了长期存在的管理和运营难题,为改善动物生存环境奠定了坚实基础。

💡 Hall的救援理念超越了单纯的动物救助,她着力于构建一个可持续的“无安乐死”收容所网络。她认识到,仅仅挑选最易收养的动物(如幼犬、小型犬)离开收容所,实际上会加剧收容所内部其他动物的困境。因此,她采取的策略是为收容所提供全面的支持,包括员工培训、兽医服务、微芯片植入和在线领养平台的推广,从而提升收容所处理和安置所有动物的能力,实现系统性的转变。

🚀 在Hall的领导下,OTAT西德州分部取得了显著成效,与六个收容所建立了合作关系,这些收容所的规模和条件各异,有些甚至比最初接触的收容所更为简陋。通过引入有效的管理方法和必要的资源,所有合作收容所在一年内都实现了“无安乐死”的目标。Hall对此深感欣慰,她认为,通过投入资源和努力,能够迅速带来改变,这种成就感远超她多年在公共辩护领域工作的感受,也体现了她对减少社区动物苦难的坚定承诺。

🌟 文章还探讨了动物救援组织与官方收容所之间的区别以及潜在的挑战。Cathy Bissell强调,官方收容所具有公共问责制,而救援组织则不然,并指出并非所有自称“救援”的组织都能真正改善动物的生活。Hall的模式恰恰是弥合了这一差距,她通过与官方收容所紧密合作,提供专业支持,确保了救援行动的透明度和有效性,最终实现了双赢的局面,为动物福利事业树立了新的典范。

When Wright first reached out to Hall, Hall was nervous about working with the shelter. “A place that was managing eight hundred dogs with twelve kennels and one employee?” she said. “I was afraid that I was going to be super fucking sad.” Hall lives off the grid on a dirt road in Terlingua, at the edge of Big Bend National Park, around two hundred miles south of Pecos—a place so remote that she sometimes calls it “the worst place in the world to run a dog rescue.” At the time, she was working for a public-defense association and saving dogs in her spare time. “I used to, like, throw twenty-five dogs in my car and drive them to Colorado,” she said. In 2019, Hall began working with a shelter in Presidio, Texas, which is just across the border from Mexico. Hall sent dogs to two rescues she’d come to know over the years, One Tail at a Time PDX and One Tail at a Time Chicago. They shared a commitment to keeping animals in foster homes instead of in kennels; there they’d be socialized and happier, and therefore more adoptable. Previously, the Presidio shelter had euthanized around eighty per cent of dogs that came in; that year, it didn’t euthanize a single healthy pet.

Hall has an understated manner that belies her ability to catch people up in the gravitational pull of her mission. Last year, she left her job in public defense, started a West Texas branch of One Tail at a Time with seed funding from the other locations, and devoted herself to dog rescue full time. Last year, thanks, in part, to funding from Best Friends, OTAT - West Texas formalized partnerships with six shelters spread across an area the size of South Carolina. Many were even worse off than the one in Pecos. In Van Horn, ninety miles southwest of Pecos, the shelter consisted of four outdoor cages bolted to a concrete pad. In most municipalities, the shelter was run by the police department; Van Horn was too small for a police department, so the public-works department was in charge.

Rescue organizations sometimes position themselves as the good guys, swooping in to save animals from certain doom in shelters. But the moral accounting is not quite so clear, according to Cathy Bissell, the founder of the Bissell Pet Foundation, a nonprofit that supports shelters and rescues. For one, as municipal services, shelters have some level of public accountability, while rescues do not. “Just because it says it’s a rescue doesn’t mean it’s going to save that animal’s life, or that animal is going to be better off, because I can tell you what I’ve seen and it’s not great,” Bissell said. “We have moved so many dogs out of failed rescue operations that, for a while, I was, like, That’s all we do. People start with good intentions, they want to save lives, and then they get overwhelmed.”

Some rescues focus on finding homes for a shelter’s most adoptable dogs—“young dogs, cute dogs, small-breed dogs, different-looking dogs,” according to Hall. “But, when you go into a shelter and you pull out all their Chihuahuas and poodles and you leave them all their pit bulls and German shepherds, you’re actually hurting the shelter.” As Hall saw it, her job was to build capacity in the regional-shelter system, not just to save individual animals. OTAT - West Texas provided shelters with staff, medications, veterinary supplies, microchips, and animal-tracking software. It taught them how to list animals on the OTAT adoption portal and facilitated transportations. Within a year, all six shelters qualified as no-kill. “If you throw resources and effort at it, you can change everything quickly. You don’t have to plod along for a generation like public defense—man, I did that for twenty-five years, and I don’t even know if we ended up in a better place than we were when we started, to be honest. But to be able to go into these shelters and just change things . . .” Hall said. “I think we all want to live in communities where we don’t have to see a lot of suffering.”

In Pecos, a shelter employee named Luis gave me a tour while Wright was waylaid by a man in a black pickup truck who wanted to surrender four pit bulls. The facility was basic but clean, and dogs pressed themselves against the metal grates at the front of the kennels, eager for attention. The former euthanasia room is now a space for medical treatment; a small fridge full of vaccines sits in the corner. Feral cats used to be immediately euthanized, because the shelter had no space for them; now there’s a dedicated cat room, where Wright joined us. “We flew eleven cats last week,” she said.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

动物收容所 动物救援 无安乐死 西部德州 One Tail at a Time Animal Shelters Animal Rescue No-Kill West Texas OTAT
相关文章