taiyangnews 10月16日 20:35
太阳能加储能成本低于新建火电厂
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

印度能源与资源研究所(TERI)最新分析显示,太阳能与储能系统结合的发电成本已低于新建火电厂,可提供全天候(RTC)电力。在印度,太阳能加储能的成本约为每千瓦时3.9至4.9卢比(约合0.044至0.056美元),而新建火电厂的成本为每千瓦时5.4至5.8卢比(约合0.061至0.066美元)。即使是太阳能加抽水蓄能方案,成本也高达每千瓦时4.4至4.9卢比。该研究通过分析德里一家电力公司的电力需求,评估了不同季节下的太阳能发电和储能需求,并调整了容量以满足全天电力供应。研究仅考虑了发电和储能成本,未包含输电、开放接入等其他费用。研究强调,成本下降得益于过去十年太阳能电价的显著下跌,并呼吁扩大可负担的储能是实现印度全天候绿色能源未来的下一步。

☀️ 太阳能与储能结合的成本效益显著提升,已成为比新建火电厂更经济的全天候电力解决方案。在印度,太阳能加储能的发电成本约为每千瓦时3.9至4.9卢比,而新建火电厂的成本则在每千瓦时5.4至5.8卢比之间,显示出明显的成本优势。

📊 研究通过对特定电力公司需求的详细分析,评估了不同季节下的太阳能发电能力和储能需求,并优化配置以实现全天候供电。该模型通过调整太阳能和储能容量,精确匹配了用户每小时的用电需求,从而量化了太阳能加储能方案的经济性。

📉 太阳能电价在过去十年中大幅下降了90%以上,是太阳能加储能方案成本竞争力增强的主要驱动因素。这一价格趋势使得太阳能成为一种更加可持续和经济的能源选择,为印度实现全天候绿色能源目标奠定了基础。

🔋 扩大可负担的储能技术是实现印度全天候绿色能源未来的关键下一步。研究指出,随着太阳能成本的下降,储能的部署变得尤为重要,能够确保电力的稳定供应,尤其是在最新的太阳能加储能招标中,最低中标价已达到每千瓦时2.86卢比,进一步印证了其经济可行性。

A new analysis by The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) shows that solar power, combined with storage systems, is now more cost-effective than new thermal power plants for round-the-clock (RTC) electricity. In India, solar-plus-storage costs range from INR 3.9 to INR 4.9 ($0.044 to $0.056)/ kWh, compared to INR 5.4 to INR 5.8 ($0.061 to $0.066)/kWh for new thermal generation. 

Even for a solar-plus-pumped storage plant (PSP), the cost is higher at INR 4.4 to INR 4.9 ($0.050 to $0.056)/kWh.  

Analysts arrived at this cost difference during a study of the per-unit energy cost of the complete power supply for Delhi utility BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (BRPL). Researchers analyzed BRPL’s 2022–23 electricity demand by selecting 4 representative days across seasons. Using PVWatts, they modeled hourly solar generation for each day and compared it with demand to determine direct solar usage and storage needs. Solar and storage capacities were then iteratively adjusted to meet full daily demand. 

Based on prevalent tariff benchmarks, the team assumed INR 2.5 ($0.028)/kWh as the solar generation cost, while it was INR 3.81 ($0.043)/kWh for PSP and INR 2.8 ($0.032)/kWh for 2-hour BESS systems. TERI used a 2-hour battery storage system as a cost reference. It believes multiple such systems can be installed to meet daily electricity demand. 

According to its methodology, the team only studied the generation and storage costs for this study. Its assessment does not include additional costs such as transmission charges and losses, open access charges, wheeling charges, cross-subsidy charges, and financing costs.  

Solar-plus-storage configurations are already competitive with new thermal generation, according to the study. These are more viable and cleaner 24/7 supply options, thanks primarily to an over 90% decline in solar tariffs in the past decade. Expanding affordable storage should be the next step towards India’s 24/7 green future, stress the researchers. 

In the latest Solar Energy Corporation Limited (SECI) tender for the 2 GW ISTS-connected tranche-XX solar PV project with 1 GW/4,000 MWh energy storage systems (ESS), winning bids breached the INR 3.00/kWh mark for a solar-plus-4-hour energy storage system (ESS) with the lowest tariff of INR 2.86 ($0.033)/kWh.  

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

太阳能 储能 火电 成本效益 印度 可再生能源 绿色能源 Solar Power Energy Storage Thermal Power Cost-Effectiveness India Renewable Energy Green Energy
相关文章