Fortune | FORTUNE 10月13日 23:51
三位经济学家因创新增长理论获诺贝尔奖
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

三位经济学家Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion和Peter Howitt因其对经济增长和人类福祉的贡献,荣获诺贝尔纪念奖。他们的研究深入阐释了创新如何推动经济发展,并解释了“创造性破坏”这一核心经济学概念,即新产品和技术如何取代旧有模式,从而促进进步。他们的工作有助于理解创新过程的机制,强调了持续创新对于避免经济停滞的重要性,并为如何培育和利用创新提供了重要见解。

💡 **创新是经济增长和人类福祉的关键驱动力**:三位获奖者的研究核心在于阐明了创新如何直接促进经济增长和提升人类福祉。他们强调,新产品和新技术的出现并非偶然,而是能够深刻改变经济格局,带来长远的积极影响。

💥 **“创造性破坏”的深入阐释**:该研究对经济学中的“创造性破坏”概念进行了详细解释和量化。这一概念描述了新颖的创新如何取代并淘汰旧有的技术和商业模式,例如电子商务取代传统零售,这被认为是资本主义的本质特征之一,并且是经济持续发展的必要过程。

🔬 **创新过程的科学性与机制**:研究指出,创新并非仅仅是“知道某物有效”,更需要有科学的解释来理解其为何有效,并且需要有机制来支持其持续的自我生成过程。这强调了科学研究和理论支撑在创新成功中的重要性。

📈 **创新对经济增长的持续性影响**:获奖者的工作表明,经济增长并非理所当然,而是需要维护和促进“创造性破坏”的机制,以避免经济陷入停滞。他们通过复杂的数学模型来分析创新如何驱动可持续增长,并为政策制定者提供了宝贵的参考。

🌍 **创新在不同经济体中的挑战与机遇**:研究也触及了当前欧洲在数字技术领域面临的生产力差距问题,并强调了培育研究和风险投资的重要性,以将创新理念转化为成功的企业。这提示了不同地区在应对创新挑战时,需要采取有针对性的策略。

Three researchers who probed the process of business innovation won the Nobel memorial prize in economics Monday for explaining how new products and inventions promote economic growth and human welfare, even as they leave older companies in the dust.

Their work was credited with helping economists better understand how ideas and technology succeed by disrupting established ways — a process as old as steam locomotives replacing horse-drawn wagons and as contemporary as e-commerce shuttering shopping malls.

Dutch-born Joel Mokyr, 79, is at Northwestern University; Philippe Aghion, 69, works at the Collège de France and the London School of Economics; and Canadian-born Peter Howitt, 79, is at Brown University.

A clearer understanding of ‘creative destruction’

The winners were credited with better explaining and quantifying “creative destruction,” a key concept in economics that refers to the process in which beneficial new innovations replace — and thus destroy — older technologies and businesses.

The concept is usually associated with economist Joseph Schumpeter, who outlined it in his 1942 book “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.” Schumpeter called the concept “the essential fact about capitalism.”

The Nobel committee said Mokyr “demonstrated that if innovations are to succeed one another in a self-generating process, we not only need to know that something works, but we also need to have scientific explanations for why.”

Aghion and Howitt studied the mechanisms behind sustained growth, including in a 1992 article that offered a complex mathematical model for creative destruction that added new aspects not included in earlier models.

Examples of creative destruction include e-commerce disrupting retail, streaming services replacing videocassette and DVD rentals and internet advertising undermining newspaper advertising.

Process is key to economic growth and human welfare

“The laureates’ work shows that economic growth cannot be taken for granted. We must uphold the mechanisms that underlie creative destruction, so that we do not fall back into stagnation,” said John Hassler, chair of the committee for the prize in economic sciences.

Mokyr has long been known as an optimist about recent technological innovation. About a decade ago, many economists took a more pessimistic view, arguing that inventions such as smartphones or even the internet had less of an economic impact than previous developments such as the airplane or the car.

Mokyr responded that because many new services were either cheap or free, their impact wasn’t evident in economic data, but they still provided enormous benefits.

In an interview with The Associated Press in 2015, he cited the music streaming service Spotify as an example of an “absolutely astonishing” innovation that economists had difficulty measuring. Mokyr noted he once owned more than 1,000 CDs and, before that, “I spent a large amount of my graduate student budget on vinyl records.” But now he could access a huge music library for a small monthly fee.

Mokyr acknowledged that the disruption from new inventions often caused at least short-term job loss or reduced earnings for workers, but like many economists, he argued that the innovations also created new, unexpected jobs that offered fresh opportunities.

Workers in the “newly industrializing part of the economy had legitimate concerns with regard to wages, standards of living, and inequality,” he wrote in a 2015 paper. Yet the new factories and machines created new jobs, at least for their descendants: “The children of the displaced handloom weavers not only had the option to work in machine-intensive cotton mills; they could also become trained engineers and telegraph operators,” he wrote.

The Nobel committee noted that for much of human history, economic stagnation, rather than growth, was the norm. Starting with the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century, however, European and later other economies began to grow steadily.

Mokyr acknowledged that the relationship between knowledge, technology and growth seemed “so self-evident” but noted that economists “actually rarely have dealt with it explicitly.”

Innovation — and how to foster it — is an urgent question in Europe, where a report by former European Central Bank head Mario Draghi argued that Europe faces a rising productivity gap with the U.S. in digital technology. Aghion said the challenge was for Europe not to fall behind the U.S. and China in innovation but to promote research and the venture capital financing to turn ideas into businesses.

“We have fantastic basic research … but we need to harness the full power of innovation,” he said.

An early morning surprise

Mokyr was still trying to get his morning coffee when he was reached by an AP reporter. He said he was shocked to win the prize.

“People always say this, but in this case I am being truthful — I had no clue that anything like this was going to happen,” he said.

His students had asked him about the possibility he would win the Nobel, he said. “I told them that I was more likely to be elected pope than to win the Nobel prize in economics — and I am Jewish, by the way.”

Mokyr will turn 80 next summer but said he has no plans to retire. “This is the type of job that I dreamed about my entire life,” he said.

He then hung up to go walk his dog.

What exactly did the three economists win?

One half of the 11 million Swedish kronor (nearly $1.2 million) prize goes to Mokyr, and the other half is shared by Aghion and Howitt. Winners also receive an 18-carat gold medal and a diploma.

The economics prize is formally known as the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. The central bank established it in 1968 as a memorial to Nobel, the 19th-century Swedish businessman and chemist who invented dynamite and established the five Nobel Prizes.

Since then, it has been awarded 57 times to a total of 99 laureates. Only three of the winners have been women.

Nobel purists stress that the economics prize is technically not a Nobel Prize, but it is always presented together with the others on Dec. 10, the anniversary of Nobel’s death in 1896.

Nobel honors were announced last week in medicinephysicschemistryliterature and peace.

___

McHugh reported from Frankfurt, Germany, and Rugaber from Washington and Corder from The Hague, Netherlands.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

经济增长 创新 创造性破坏 诺贝尔经济学奖 科技进步 Economic Growth Innovation Creative Destruction Nobel Prize in Economics Technological Advancement
相关文章