New Yorker 10月13日 20:11
联邦机构调查大学系统,资金暂停引发广泛影响
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

近期,包括美国农业部和国家海洋和大气管理局在内的联邦机构对缅因大学系统展开调查,并暂停了多项关键资金。农业部审查了大学在Title IX合规性方面的表现,而NOAA则取消了对支持沿海社区的缅因海产赠款项目的资助。这些举措引发了大学领导层和研究人员的担忧,因为许多项目,包括支持农村女孩STEM教育的项目,以及重要的海洋研究和农业创新,都依赖于这些联邦资金。尽管部分资金后来得到恢复,但调查和暂停事件已对大学的运营和声誉造成了显著影响,并凸显了政治因素对科研项目可能造成的干扰。

🔬 **联邦机构介入与资金审查**:包括美国农业部(USDA)在内的多个联邦机构已对缅因大学系统展开调查。USDA特别审查了大学在Title IX(禁止联邦资助学校的性别歧视)方面的合规性,这可能影响到妇女参与体育运动的公平性。同时,国家海洋和大气管理局(NOAA)也通知大学暂停了对缅因海产赠款项目的资助,该项目对支持沿海社区至关重要,引发了大学校长和参议员的关注,并最终导致资金的逐步恢复。

🌊 **海产赠款项目的重要性与影响**:缅因海产赠款项目通过支持如牡蛎养殖等海洋生态系统和相关产业,对当地经济和社区发挥着关键作用。项目支持了包括缅因牡蛎小径在内的旅游项目,并为当地居民提供了就业培训。该项目的资金暂停,直接威胁到依赖其支持的渔业、旅游业和科研工作,并引发了如项目所有者 Brendan Parsons 等人的强烈质疑,他们认为该项目并非浪费,而是对当地发展至关重要。

🌱 **大学的广泛科研使命与政治干扰**:作为一所赠地大学,缅因大学肩负着支持农业和林业发展的使命。其研究项目涵盖了从开发抗病土豆到利用森林生产航空燃料等多个领域,这些研究对于地方经济发展具有重要意义,但可能不被常春藤盟校等机构所关注。然而,近期政治因素对科研的干扰愈发明显,例如,一个关于海上风力涡轮机的项目因被卷入关于“阻止男性进入女性体育”的政治辩论而被暂停,即使其最初的暂停指令源自另一项行政命令,显示了不同政治议题的混乱交织。

Federal agencies started investigations across the state, including into the entire University of Maine system. The Department of Agriculture, which provides significant grant money to the university, announced that it would be reviewing the system’s compliance with Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination at federally funded schools and protects women’s access to sports. Soon afterward, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration informed the university that funding for its Maine Sea Grant program, which supports coastal communities, had been discontinued. Joan Ferrini-Mundy, the university’s president, was at a dogsled race near the Canadian border when she got the news. She rushed to a hot-cocoa stand and called Senator Susan Collins.

Maine can feel like a small town. It has about one and a half million people, with true “Mainer” status reserved for families who have lived there for generations. UMaine embodies this ethos. It’s the state’s only flagship public school and its only top-tier research university. Maine’s politics are purple: Democrats hold the governor’s mansion and the legislature, but Trump carried one of the state’s four electoral votes in 2024, and Collins, a Republican whose family has deep UMaine ties, has held her Senate seat for nearly three decades. When Collins heard about the Sea Grant cuts, she had just returned from the Maine Fishermen’s Forum, a gathering for the state’s fishing industry. The potential consequences of the cuts couldn’t have been clearer.

On a recent morning, Gayle Zydlewski, the director of the Maine Sea Grant program, took me out on the Damariscotta River, near the coast. The water was dotted with signs of a nearly invisible ecosystem: clamdiggers on the shore, kelp lines in the current, rows of what looked like small floating oil drums, which turned out to be an underwater oyster farm. Sea Grant helps keep this ecosystem functioning.

We stopped at a wooden platform in the middle of the river and hopped up. Beneath our feet were trapdoors, which opened to reveal trays of about two hundred oysters. Workers hauled them up, sorted them by size, hosed them off, and bagged them so that they’d be ready to sell. Brendan Parsons, who owned the oyster farm, explained how Sea Grant had supported his business: the Maine Oyster Trail, a statewide tourism program developed by Sea Grant staff, funnels visitors to his farm and restaurant. About half his workers had taken a Sea Grant training course. UMaine’s researchers are also developing cheaper methods of growing oysters. “This isn’t some willy-nilly program,” Parsons said. “It’s just astonishing that people would think that there’s waste there.”

UMaine is a land-grant university, with a mission to support agriculture and forestry. Researchers joke that Sea Grant is the university’s “salty extension.” “A lot of people in the country, when they think of research institutions, they tend to think of the Ivy League colleges,” Collins told me. But much more of higher education looks like UMaine. The school’s scientists are developing blight-resistant potatoes and testing ways to make jet fuel out of the wood in Maine’s forests. “This is not research that is likely to be picked up by a Harvard or a Yale,” Collins said.

The senator recalled having at least five conversations with Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce—which oversees NOAA—about Sea Grant. Within days of receiving the termination letter, UMaine was told that the funding would eventually be restored. But the narrative around the university had been set, and the crackdown was just beginning. As Andy Harris, a Republican congressman, wrote in a statement about UMaine a week later, “Women and Girls’ sports must be protected from woke identity politics.”

When the U.S.D.A. opened its Title IX review of UMaine, in February, the school’s leaders responded but never heard back. Two weeks later, Griffin Dill, who runs UMaine’s Tick Lab, forwarded them an e-mail he had received, stating that the U.S.D.A. had been directed to pause all funding to Columbia and the University of Maine system. Dill’s lab, which dissects ticks to check for Lyme and other diseases, seemed far removed from campus culture wars. “No one likes ticks,” he said.

As the spring went on, the confusion deepened. Grant administrators logged in to federal dashboards to draw down funds that had been awarded, only to find money missing. One vanished U.S.D.A. grant was for a STEM program for rural high-school girls, including “students from minority, immigrant, refugee, and asylum-seeking families.” When the university wrote to the U.S.D.A., program officers explained that the funds had been paused “during the transition of government” but wouldn’t elaborate; when UMaine officials tried to call, no one answered. A program officer for a different grant, related to soil health, wrote that his department had been told to pause any Biden-era funding. “I am very sorry and know this is causing much turmoil on your side,” he added.

Ferrini-Mundy told researchers that whenever they discovered that money was missing, received a notice letter, or even heard a rumor about a funding change, they were to report it. At town halls, professors worried aloud about their labs, staff, and graduate students, whom they employed with federal money. It wasn’t even clear which grants were being frozen as part of a Maine-specific Title IX crackdown, which ones were part of the broader DOGE dragnet, or what other mysterious government machinations might be to blame.

In April, UMaine learned that a Department of Energy grant for a floating offshore wind-turbine project was suspended—on the same day that a three-hundred-and-seventy-five-ton platform had been hauled to a dock in Searsport. The university couldn’t fund the project’s launch, but it couldn’t leave the platform in port, either, forcing school officials to find emergency funds to move forward. Trump, who has called wind turbines “ugly,” had issued an executive order pausing leasing and permitting for offshore wind projects. Yet when UMaine contacted the Department of Energy, a program officer explained that the suspensions were tied to another executive order: “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports.” Different political priorities had gotten tangled together. Offshore wind had become part of a debate about transgender athletes, rather than a debate about offshore wind.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

缅因大学系统 联邦调查 Title IX 海产赠款 科研资金 政治干扰 University of Maine System Federal Investigations Title IX Sea Grant Research Funding Political Interference
相关文章