New Yorker 10月11日 11:38
特朗普政府军事化部署引发争议
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨了特朗普政府在国内城市部署联邦军事人员的做法,并指出此举在公众中普遍不受欢迎。尽管面临法律挑战和民意反对,但文章也分析了为何许多有权势的个人和机构仍选择顺应总统的要求。文章认为,根深蒂固的政治分歧、对总统支持的潜在叙事效应,以及企业和政界人士出于自身利益考量,是造成这种现象的原因。此外,文章还提及了特朗普总统对民意调查数据的看法及其在推特上的回应。

⚖️ 法院裁决限制总统权力:文章开头以联邦法官驳回特朗普政府在伊利诺伊州部署国民警卫队的案例,强调了法律对总统权力的制约,并引用了州长的话“唐纳德·特朗普不是国王——他的政府也不在法律之上”,突显了对总统越权行为的质疑。

📉 民意调查显示部署不受欢迎:引用CNN和Quinnipiac大学、CBS News/YouGov的民意调查数据,指出大多数美国民众反对在城市部署国民警卫队,显示出特朗普政府的这一国内政策并未获得广泛支持。

🤔 权力顺从的深层原因:文章分析了为何G.O.P.领导层、企业界等看似有权势的群体会屈从于特朗普总统的要求。原因包括:根深蒂固的政治分歧使得任何一点支持都可能被放大;顺从总统的成本可能并非普遍的公众反对;以及企业和政界人士出于规避风险、寻求便利或利用当下机会等现实考量。

📈 特朗普对民意的解读与策略:文章提及特朗普总统对民意调查结果的质疑,以及他声称自己拥有更高支持率的说法,并指出他即便在民调数据不佳的情况下,依然采取强硬姿态,这反映了他独特的政治策略和对自身支持度的认知。

The indictment of Letitia James is the next step on Donald Trump’s revenge tour. But, first, his most controversial domestic policies, including military deployments to American cities, are unpopular with the public—as is the President himself. Does it matter? Plus:

Federal officers in Portland, Oregon.Photograph by Stephen Lam / San Francisco Chronicle / Getty

Jon Allsop 
A contributing writer who covers politics.

Yesterday, April M. Perry, a federal judge, barred the Trump Administration from deploying the National Guard in Illinois, for at least the next fourteen days. “I have seen no credible evidence that there is danger of rebellion in the state,” Perry noted from the bench. J. B. Pritzker, the governor of Illinois, who had been resisting the deployments to Chicago (and who Trump said this week “should be in jail”), celebrated the ruling on social media, writing, “Donald Trump is not a king—and his administration is not above the law.”

President Trump’s dispatching of military personnel to American cities—including Portland, Oregon, where litigation is also pending—could be described in many such authoritarian-esque terms. Certainly, “popular” does not appear to be one of them. Earlier this week, CNN’s Aaron Blake pointed out that clear majorities among the public seem to be against the practice: a recent poll from Quinnipiac University found that fifty-five per cent of respondents disapproved of the deployment of the National Guard, compared with forty-two per cent who approved; on Sunday, CBS News/YouGov reported an even higher rate of disapproval, and the same rate of support—forty-two per cent.

The late science-fiction author Douglas Adams once posited that the number forty-two was the answer to the ultimate question of “life, the universe and everything.” It might, at least, be the answer to the question, How popular is Donald Trump? The aforementioned CBS News/YouGov poll also pegged Trump’s over-all approval rating at forty-two per cent, and several polling averages put him either at that figure, or a point or so to either side. This past Monday night, Jimmy Kimmel, a recent subject of Trump’s ire, crowed that, per another poll, he is more popular than the President. “At this point, finding a toenail in your salad has a seven-point lead over Donald Trump,” Kimmel said.

Trump obviously isn’t buying these figures. On Sunday, he accused Fox News of refusing “to put up Polls that correctly show me at 65% in Popularity, a Republican RECORD.” Whatever he actually thinks, he is behaving as if it’s correct, which is no surprise. What might be surprising is that so many ostensibly powerful people—G.O.P. leadership in Congress, heads of major corporations—seem so eager to accede to the imperial demands of a President who is not racking up imperial numbers.

I have a few theories about why they are bowing to Trump. First, America’s political divides appear so entrenched that when support for a single person or policy manages to break through, it creates a narrative boost that is disproportionate to actual support. Trump could still be bathing in the glow of his election win last year, even though he did not quite get fifty per cent of the popular vote and his approval rating since taking office has steadily declined.

At the same time, if you’re a corporation or university or media outlet considering bowing to one of Trump’s demands, it’s a safe-ish bet that the cost will not be universal public disapprobation. Plus, Trump is the President now, wielding that office in expansively transactional ways: G.O.P. lawmakers clearly do not want to get on his bad side; corporations—especially those with pending regulatory business before the Administration—have reason to be on his good side. Some corporations, in particular, may be taking advantage of this moment to pursue changes they wanted to make anyway—curbing costly diversity initiatives, for example, or disowning thorny content-moderation responsibilities. (Both this and the regulatory angle are potential explanations for CBS News putting Bari Weiss in charge, which I wrote about earlier this week.)

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

特朗普政府 军事部署 国内政策 民意调查 法律挑战 政治分析 Trump Administration Military Deployment Domestic Policy Public Opinion Polls Legal Challenges Political Analysis
相关文章