Fortune | FORTUNE 10月10日 06:21
詹姆斯面临刑事指控,案件引发政治动机质疑
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

前纽约州总检察长詹姆斯因被控银行欺诈和向金融机构提供虚假陈述而面临刑事起诉。此案的检察官由特朗普政府匆忙任命,引发了对其动机的质疑,尤其是在詹姆斯曾起诉特朗普及其公司并胜诉的背景下。此举被视为特朗普政府利用司法部门追究政治对手的又一例证,尽管詹姆斯的律师坚决否认指控,并称此案是政治报复。案件细节尚未公开,但其非传统的起诉路径和对前检察官的替换,都加剧了外界对案件公正性的担忧。

⚖️ 詹姆斯面临刑事指控:前纽约州总检察长詹姆斯已被大陪审团起诉,罪名涉及银行欺诈和向金融机构提供虚假陈述。这一起诉发生在詹姆斯曾成功起诉特朗普及其公司之后,引发了广泛关注。

🏛️ 政治动机疑虑重重:此次起诉的检察官是在特朗普政府压力下匆忙任命的,且此前曾是特朗普的私人律师。这使得外界普遍质疑此案存在政治报复的动机,而非纯粹的司法公正,尤其是在特朗普本人多次公开表示詹姆斯“罪该万死”的情况下。

🔍 案件细节与程序争议:目前案件细节仍处于保密状态,但起诉过程存在非传统之处,包括更换了此前负责调查但未采取行动的资深检察官,转而任命了一位缺乏联邦检察经验的律师。这种程序上的变动加剧了对案件公正性的担忧。

⚖️ 詹姆斯律师的回应:詹姆斯的律师坚决否认所有指控,并将此次调查描述为“政治复仇”。他们强调詹姆斯并未误导任何人,并指出特朗普政府试图利用司法系统来解决个人恩怨。

🕵️‍♂️ 特朗普政府的行动模式:此案被视为特朗普政府利用司法部门追究政治对手和曾调查过他的公众人物的又一迹象,与此前对前FBI局长科米等人的起诉类似,显示出其打破常规、采取强硬手段的决心。

James, who infuriated President Donald Trump by suing him and his company for fraud in a case that played out as he was running for office, was indicted on charges of bank fraud and false statements to a financial institution following a presentation to a grand jury in Virginia by a prosecutor who was hastily appointed last month amid Trump administration pressure to deliver criminal cases against his adversaries.

James’ office had no immediate comment Thursday. Her lawyers have vigorously denied any allegations and characterized the investigation as an act of political revenge.

The indictment, two weeks after a separate criminal case charging former FBI Director James Comey with lying to Congress, is the latest indication of the Trump administration’s norm-busting determination to use the law enforcement powers of the Justice Department to pursue the president’s political foes and public figures who once investigated him.

The James case remained under seal Thursday, making it impossible to assess what evidence prosecutors have. But as was the case with the Comey charges, the prosecution followed a strikingly unconventional route. The Trump administration, two weeks ago, pushed out Erik Siebert, the veteran prosecutor who had overseen the investigation for months but had resisted pressure to file a case, and replaced him with Lindsey Halligan, a White House aide who was once Trump’s personal lawyer but who has never worked as a federal prosecutor.

Halligan presented the case to the grand jury herself, as she did in the case against Comey, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.

“No one is above the law. The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust,” Halligan said in a statement. “The facts and the law in this case are clear, and we will continue following them to ensure that justice is served.”

Trump has been advocating charging James for months, posting on social media without citing any evidence that she’s “guilty as hell” and telling reporters at the White House, “It looks to me like she’s really guilty of something, but I really don’t know.”

Her lawyer has accused the Justice Department of concocting a bogus criminal case to settle Trump’s personal vendetta against James, who last year won a staggering judgment against Trump and his companies in a lawsuit alleging he lied to banks and others about the value of his assets.

The Justice Department has also been investigating mortgage-related allegations against Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook, using the probe to demand her ouster, and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., whose lawyer called the allegations against him “transparently false, stale, and long debunked.”

But James is a particularly personal target. As attorney general, she sued the Republican president and his administration dozens of times and oversaw a lawsuit accusing him of defrauding banks by dramatically overstating the value of his real estate holdings on financial statements.

An appeals court overturned the fine, which had ballooned to more than $500 million with interest, but upheld a lower court’s finding that Trump had committed fraud.

The Justice Department probe began after Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte sent a letter in April to Attorney General Pam Bondi, asking her to investigate James over her role in the 2023 purchase of a house in Norfolk, Virginia.

In seeking the investigation, Pulte cited a two-page power-of-attorney form that James signed on Aug. 17, 2023, which states, “I intend to occupy this property as my principal residence.” He speculated that claiming the house as her primary residence might have allowed James to avoid higher interest rates that often apply to second homes.

James’ lawyer, Abbe Lowell, said the Democrat never misled anyone. James has said that she made an error while filling out a form related to the home purchase, but quickly rectified it and didn’t deceive the lender.

Fortune Global Forum

returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business.

Apply for an invitation.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

詹姆斯 特朗普 刑事指控 政治动机 司法公正 James Trump Criminal Charges Political Motivation Justice System
相关文章