a16z 10月10日 01:04
AI创业新机遇:构筑数据壁垒,打造竞争优势
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

随着生成式AI的普及,领先的AI公司正从单纯的基础设施提供商向应用层拓展,这给初创企业带来了挑战。文章指出,初创企业在AI领域的突围之道在于构建“数据围墙花园”,即拥有专有、受限且极具价值的数据集。通过VLex(法律)和OpenEvidence(医疗)的案例,文章阐释了如何通过系统性地收集、整合和管理特定领域的数据,形成难以复制的竞争壁垒。此外,文章还列举了供应链、地方政府记录、前沿科学、文化档案、利基行业和气候数据等多个潜在的数据围墙花园领域,为AI初创企业提供了构建长期竞争优势的战略方向。

🔑 **AI基础设施提供商的战略转变与初创企业的应对之道**:文章指出,OpenAI和Anthropic等公司正从提供基础模型API转向构建面向终端用户的产品,这挤压了初创企业的生存空间。文章的核心观点是,初创企业不应与大型AI公司在模型能力或算力上直接竞争,而应通过构建“数据围墙花园”来建立独特的竞争优势。这种策略强调的是对特定领域内专有、受限且高价值数据的独占性控制,从而形成一道难以逾越的护城河。

🛡️ **“数据围墙花园”的定义与价值**:文章将“数据围墙花园”定义为信息获取受限、专有且极具价值的领域,其独特性本身构成了竞争壁垒。这些数据集通常具备专有性(非公开网络可获取)、受监管或敏感性(需合规、许可或资质)、以及动态且经过 curated(持续更新和验证)的特点。文章通过VLex在法律领域和OpenEvidence在医疗领域的成功实践,证明了拥有独特、难以获取的数据集是构建AI原生工具的坚实基础,因为这些数据能够支持更精准、更权威的AI推理,远胜于通用模型。

🌱 **发掘和培育潜在“数据围墙花园”的新兴领域**:除了法律和医疗,文章还列举了多个极具潜力的“数据围墙花园”领域,为初创企业提供了广阔的创新空间。这些领域包括:供应链与物流(全球贸易数据)、地方及市政政府记录(许可、规划数据)、前沿科学领域(实验结果、预印本)、文化与创意档案(博物馆、历史资料)、利基行业工作流程(专有但非结构化数据)以及气候与环境数据(排放、气候风险数据)。文章强调,这些领域的数据目前高度碎片化,但通过系统性的收集、整理和标准化,可以构建起新的AI应用生态,实现差异化竞争。

When Infrastructure Climbs the Stack

When generative AI first broke into the mainstream, companies like OpenAI and Anthropic were understood primarily as infrastructure providers. Developers were encouraged to build on top of them, with the promise that AI models would be the foundation layer of a vast new ecosystem of applications. But today, these same companies are climbing further up the stack.

Take OpenAI’s recent release of Sora2, a consumer-facing app for video generation. What was once just a raw capability (text-to-video) is now packaged into an end-user experience, competing head-on with startups that thought they’d have room to build applications. Similarly, Anthropic has launched Claude Teams, not just offering API access to Claude models but delivering a ready-made productivity suite for enterprises.

Think of the model companies as farms. They used to sell ingredients to restaurants — the startups — who turned them into meals. Now the farms are running restaurants too. To stand out, you can either cook better with the same ingredients or source ones no one else can.

This raises a key strategic question: how can startups build defensible businesses when their infrastructure providers are also their fiercest competitors?

Our answer: by planting seeds in walled gardens of data. In this case, walled gardens of data are domains where access to information is restricted, proprietary, and highly valuable — and where exclusivity itself creates a moat. These datasets are typically:

    Proprietary: not freely available on the open webRegulated or sensitive: requiring compliance, licensing, or credentials to gain accessDynamic and curated: constantly updated and validated

With that definition in mind, let’s review two examples: VLex in law and OpenEvidence in medicine.

VLex and OpenEvidence: Case Studies in Data Moats

VLex, a legal software company in Spain, began in 2000 as an ambitious effort to “revolutionize legal information access” by building a comprehensive legal content platform and applying new technologies to legal research. Spanish court decisions, statutes, and regulations were historically scattered across fragmented regional jurisdictions and often not available in machine-readable formats. Over the years, VLex systematically acquired, licensed, and digitized this content — effectively creating one of the most comprehensive legal databases in Europe. The result is something akin to LexisNexis + Westlaw + Bloomberg Law, specifically for Spanish legal history.

By the time generative AI models became viable, VLex had already amassed a proprietary corpus of legal data spanning decades of judgments and commentary. This gave it a defensible wedge to build AI-native legal research tools: unlike general-purpose models, VLex’s system can actually reason over authoritative, complete, and current legal texts. Its moat isn’t the model — it’s the painstakingly assembled dataset that no one else has.

Said differently: a lawyer crafting the best possible brief or argument needs access to every legitimate matter of precedent. A general-purpose model — even one as powerful as OpenAI’s — might produce a sophisticated-sounding legal argument, but missing even a few critical historical cases could be the difference between winning and losing.

If the stakes are high in law, they’re even higher in medicine. OpenEvidence pursued a parallel strategy to VLex, but in healthcare. While health information is plentiful online, most of it is unvetted or consumer-grade (think WebMD articles or forum posts). Clinicians, by contrast, rely on peer-reviewed literature, systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines — much of which sits behind paywalls like Elsevier or is restricted to medical institutions.

OpenEvidence spent years building partnerships, licensing agreements, and ingestion pipelines to create a structured database of vetted medical research. With that foundation, its AI can answer complex clinical questions with evidence-backed precision, rather than hallucinating or relying on incomplete public data. In medicine, where trust and accuracy are existential, this walled garden is not only a moat but also provides a far superior user experience to that offered by general-purpose models. If you’re researching a personal ailment, you’d much rather get scientifically grounded advice than spiral into WebMD doom-scrolling.

These stories show the power of owning unique, hard-to-access data. But the opportunity doesn’t stop at law or medicine. Across industries, fragmented datasets remain unclaimed — waiting to be cultivated into walled gardens that could anchor the next wave of AI-native companies. Let’s examine a few.

Potential “De Novo” Walled Gardens

1. Supply Chain & Logistics

    Today: Shipping manifests, port records, customs filings, and trucking/rail logistics are fragmented and poorly digitized.Opportunity: A startup that aggregates and cleans proprietary global trade data could build an AI layer for predictive supply chain management, trade finance, or geopolitical risk modeling.Why it’s open: Maersk, Flexport, and others each see a slice — no one owns the full global corpus.

2. Local & Municipal Government Records

    Today: Permits, zoning applications, environmental impact studies, inspection records — scattered across thousands of local jurisdictions.Opportunity: A startup could systematically crawl, digitize, and normalize this data into a walled garden for real estate, infrastructure, and energy developers.Why it’s open: LexisNexis and Westlaw own case law, but no one has consolidated local regulatory data at scale.

3. Frontier Science Domains

    Today: Fields like synthetic biology, quantum materials, or advanced chemistry publish research in disparate journals and lab repositories.Opportunity: Aggregate experimental results and preprints into structured datasets to train AI that accelerates R&D.Why it’s open: Unlike medicine (where Elsevier and PubMed dominate), frontier sciences are less centralized and still up for grabs.

4. Cultural & Creative Archives

    Today: Museums, historical societies, and cultural archives have vast but fragmented collections (images, manuscripts, recordings). Much of it isn’t digitized or is locked in individual silos.Opportunity: A company could license and structure these datasets to power AI models for cultural preservation, education, or entertainment (e.g. historically accurate immersive experiences).Why it’s open: Most of this remains under-monetized, sitting in primarily offline institutions without AI ambitions.

5. Niche Industry Workflows

    Today: Many industries generate proprietary but unstructured datasets (e.g. veterinary records, construction blueprints, niche manufacturing specs).Opportunity: Startups can target verticals too small for incumbents but where data exclusivity creates defensibility.Why it’s open: Incumbents may not view these niches as large enough to pursue walled gardens — but AI could make them valuable.

6. Climate & Environmental Data

    Today: Fragmented across government agencies, NGOs, and scientific institutions, often in PDFs or inaccessible formats.Opportunity: A company could license and unify emissions data, supply-chain carbon intensity, or local climate risk data into a proprietary corpus. Structured properly, this data could power AI products for compliance (e.g. SEC climate disclosures), risk underwriting, or clean-energy development.Why it’s open: No Bloomberg-equivalent exists yet for climate.

Why This Matters: The Path to Defensibility

The model companies will always command bigger models, more compute, and more distribution–those are hard games for startups to win. But there’s an opening in ecosystems where high-quality data has historically been fragmented, sensitive, or difficult to access — places where sovereignty and trust matter more than raw capability.

Building new walled gardens isn’t easy: it requires significant upfront investment and often painstaking groundwork, striking deals across companies, governments, and institutions. Yet when it works, the result is nearly impossible to replicate, offering one of the rare durable edges in an increasingly competitive AI landscape.

Are you building a new walled garden? We’d love to hear from you.

                                            </div>

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Generative AI Startups Competitive Advantage Data Moats Walled Gardens AI Strategy VLex OpenEvidence Healthcare AI Legal Tech Emerging Technologies 生成式AI 初创企业 竞争优势 数据壁垒 数据围墙花园 AI战略 法律科技 医疗AI 新兴技术
相关文章