All Content from Business Insider 10月07日
埃里森收购自由论坛,任命韦斯为CBS新闻主编
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

派拉蒙新任老板大卫·埃里森完成了对芭蕾·韦斯创办的《自由论坛》的收购,并任命韦斯为CBS新闻的总编辑。这一系列举动,包括承诺不采取DEI实践、任命保守派人士担任监察员,以及取消反特朗普节目《科尔伯特深夜秀》,引发了关于埃里森是否出于政治考量,特别是为了迎合特朗普及其盟友的猜测。尽管埃里森本人声称对政治不感兴趣,但《自由论坛》的收购被视为一项文化而非财务投资,旨在调整派拉蒙的媒体立场,但其真实动机仍不明朗。

⭐ 媒体所有权变更与高层任命:派拉蒙公司在新老板大卫·埃里森的领导下,收购了由芭蕾·韦斯创立的《自由论坛》媒体公司,并任命韦斯为CBS新闻的总编辑。这一举措标志着派拉蒙在媒体内容和管理层上的一次重要调整。

🧐 政治立场与监管承诺:埃里森在收购过程中向监管机构承诺,派拉蒙将不推行DEI(多元、公平与包容)实践,并设立一名具有保守派背景的监察员来处理偏见投诉。这些承诺以及取消被视为反特朗普的《科尔伯特深夜秀》节目,引发了对其是否出于政治考量,尤其是迎合特朗普及其盟友的猜测。

💡 文化投资而非财务考量:尽管《自由论坛》是一项小型订阅制初创媒体,派拉蒙为其支付了1.5亿美元,远超其直接财务收益。此举被解读为一项文化投资,旨在调整派拉蒙的媒体内容方向,而非追求短期财务回报。

❓ 动机不明与信号意义:尽管埃里森本人声称对政治不感兴趣,但其一系列操作,包括收购《自由论坛》和取消反特朗普节目,使得外界难以判断其真实动机是出于个人信念,还是为了获得政治上的便利,例如在与监管机构的谈判中获得支持。这种不确定性本身就构成了当前美国商业和媒体领域的一个重要特征。

David Ellison's Paramount has bought Bari Weiss's Free Press — and appointed her editor in chief of CBS News. Now what?

David Ellison keeps saying he's not interested in politics. The new Paramount CEO/owner says it in interviews, to staff, to regulators.

But over the last year, as Ellison maneuvered to buy the company and since he acquired it, Paramount has made a series of moves that sure make it look like he's interested in politics. And those politics look like they're on the right side of the spectrum.

Ellison has promised regulators, for instance, that his company won't engage in any kind of DEI practices — practices that had become standard issue in corporate America before the return of the Trump administration. Ellison also promised to install an ombudsman to monitor complaints about bias — and that ombudsman turned out to be someone with conservative credentials.

A few weeks before Ellison closed his deal to acquire Paramount, the company announced it was canceling "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," one of the most openly anti-Trump shows on late-night TV.

And now Paramount has acquired The Free Press, the media startup founded by Bari Weiss, a former editor and writer at The New York Times. Weiss will now be editor in chief of Paramount's CBS News unit, reporting directly to Ellison.

Weiss' fans — and there are plenty of them, including Mathias Döpfner, who owns the company that owns Business Insider — will often describe her as a centrist who calls out excess on both sides. Weiss likes to describe herself that way, too.

But The Free Press isn't neutral. It was built as a counterweight to what Weiss describes as doctrinaire liberal groupthink in mainstream newsrooms — first at The New York Times, which she left in 2020, and now across establishment media more broadly. In 2022, shortly after Elon Musk acquired Twitter, Musk invited Weiss to root around the company's internal files so she could produce stories critical of the previous management's woke regime.

This doesn't mean Ellison has turned Paramount, whose reps didn't respond to comment for this story, into Fox News.

Before Ellison finalized his Paramount acquisition, he signed off on a $1.5 billion deal to lock down "South Park" — a franchise that has gleefully mocked Trump, and went out of its way to do so after the recent payday.

And while lots of observers, including Stephen Colbert, believe Colbert's show was canceled to appease Trump, no smoking gun has emerged to prove that claim. There's also no evidence of Ellison's hand shaping the politics of any other Paramount output to date.

Still. Even if the day-to-day programming hasn't shifted, the signals matter. There's been chatter about whether Paramount overpaid by spending $150 million on The Free Press — a small, subscription-based startup — especially as it's cutting staff elsewhere. But that debate misses the point: This isn't a financial bet, it's a cultural one. Ellison isn't buying revenue; he's buying alignment.

So what's he aligning with? That's the hard part to parse.

Maybe Ellison, who previously supported Democrats — or his father, Larry Ellison, an open Trump supporter — genuinely believes the media is too liberal and needs to be moved rightward. Maybe he's simply appeasing Trump and his allies, like FCC chair Brendan Carr, who had real power to slow or stop his merger. Either explanation fits the facts.

But that's exactly the problem: We can't tell which one is true. And that uncertainty is what defines this moment in American business and media.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

David Ellison Paramount Bari Weiss The Free Press CBS News Media Acquisition Political Influence DEI Practices Donald Trump Cultural Investment Media Alignment
相关文章