Fortune | FORTUNE 10月04日
增长能否化解债务?警惕债务周期的危险信号
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨了美国总统特朗普关于经济增长能够解决债务问题的观点,并援引了雷·达利奥关于债务周期的警告。达利奥认为,在债务周期的后期,领导者容易将暂时的繁荣误认为是债务免疫的标志。尽管特朗普政府推行了减税和关税政策,期望以此刺激经济增长并增加财政收入,但数据显示,联邦债务仍处于高位,且关税收入远不足以偿还债务。达利奥的债务周期理论指出,当借贷和债务偿还成本增长速度超过偿还所需收入时,危机便会发生。他强调,过度刺激可能导致通货膨胀,而过度紧缩则可能引发衰退,指出特朗普提出的政策难以实现财政与货币政策的平衡。文章最后警示,在债务周期的顶峰,资产价格和收入的虚假繁荣容易掩盖潜在风险,一旦这种“幻觉”破灭,后果将是严重的。

📈 **警惕“增长化解债务”的误区:** 文章引用了雷·达利奥的观点,指出在债务周期的后期,领导者可能将暂时的经济繁荣误解为债务增长的免疫力。特朗普政府提出的“大而美丽的法案”旨在通过减税和关税刺激经济,并声称能够通过经济增长来降低相对债务水平。然而,文章通过数据指出,尽管有经济增长,美国的联邦债务总量依然庞大,债务占GDP的比率也居高不下,显示出增长并不必然能直接“消化”债务。

📉 **债务周期的内在风险与达利奥的警告:** 雷·达利奥根据对多个债务周期的研究,强调了债务增长速度超过收入增长速度是导致债务危机的根本原因。他指出,在繁荣时期,信贷扩张会暂时推高增长,但这种增长并不可持续,最终收入会低于贷款成本。过度刺激可能导致通货膨胀和货币贬值,而过度的紧缩则可能引发经济衰退。特朗普政府提出的永久性减税和关税驱动的刺激措施,被认为难以在财政和货币政策之间找到可持续的平衡点。

📊 **资产泡沫与心理误导:** 文章深入分析了债务危机中的心理因素。达利奥指出,资产价格上涨和收入增加会使人们产生财富错觉,从而增加支出、借贷和冒险行为,形成泡沫。当债务相对于收入增长达到极限时,这种增长过程会逆转,导致自我强化的收缩。文章提到,当前美国资产价格接近历史高点,失业率较低,这些信号可能掩盖了债务增长快于经济增长的现实,而这种乐观情绪一旦破灭,将可能导致严重的经济后果。

President Donald Trump’s assertion that U.S. growth can tame debt echoes what Ray Dalio has called the most dangerous phase of a debt cycle: when leaders mistake prosperity for immunity.

In an interview with One America News on Thursday, Trump pointed to his “Big, Beautiful Bill” that locks in and expands tax cuts from his first term while adding new deductions on tips, overtime pay, and Social Security income for seniors. Combined with his latest round of tariffs, Trump argued, the package will deliver both “record growth” and an unprecedented fiscal windfall.

“We are becoming a country that is so rich, so powerful,” he said. “With the kind of growth we have now, the debt is very low relatively speaking. You grow yourself out of that debt.”

Real GDP rose at a solid 3.8% annualized pace in Q2 2025, but the debt picture isn’t “very low.” Gross federal debt still sits around $37.4 trillion, and the debt-to-GDP ratio is about 100% for 2025, according to Treasury and CBO-linked dashboards

Tariff receipts are up sharply this year, but estimates show roughly $165 billion by August and about $300 billion on an annualized basis, far short of the trillion needed for paying down the debt.

On top of that, Trump also suggested the government could use tariff revenue to send Americans “distributions” of up to $2,000, which would go into consumers’ pockets instead of helping to offset budget deficits.

But Dalio, who has studied dozens of major debt cycles, wrote in his 2018 book Principles for Navigating Big Debt Crises that during booms, “lending supports spending and investment, which in turn supports incomes and asset prices,” temporarily pushing growth “above the consistent productivity growth of the economy.” But that can’t last, he warned — “eventually income will fall below the cost of the loans.”

Elsewhere, he added that debt burdens only ease when “nominal income growth is higher than nominal interest rates.,” but too much stimulus risks “unacceptable inflation and currency declines.”

The billionaire founder of Bridgewater Associates has cautioned against leaders celebrating prosperity as proof that leverage no longer matters, even as debt quietly outpaces income. To Dalio, that rhetoric is the hallmark of a late-stage debt cycle, before reality intrudes. 

Dalio’s debt-cycle warning

Dalio has spent decades studying how countries borrow, boom, and then buckle under the weight of their obligations. Looking across nearly 50 major debt cycles—from the Roaring Twenties to the 2008 crisis—he sees the same pattern of debt fueling growth in the early stages, but eventually the debt itself grows faster than the income needed to service it.

“Typically debt crises occur because debt and debt service costs rise faster than the incomes that are needed to service them,” Dalio wrote. Policymakers can stretch the party by cutting rates, but “when that happens, the deleveraging begins.”

The real danger, in Dalio’s telling, isn’t just in the debt itself but the psychology. Bubbles form because rising asset prices and higher incomes convince people they’re richer than they really are. They spend more, borrow more, and take on greater risks.

“In the first stage of the bubble, debts rise faster than incomes…borrowers feel rich, so they spend more than they earn and buy assets at high prices with leverage.”

In the U.S., debt held by the public is also projected to climb from about 100% of the GDP in 2025 to 118% by 2035, according to CBO forecasts, meaning debt is growing faster than the underlying economy.  Meanwhile, CBO says the government’s net interest costs also will continue to grow as a share of GDP.

This is the scenario Dalio warns of, namely if interest costs exceed growth rates, growth can no longer carry the debt burden in the way that Trump assumes, because growth is vulnerable to shifts in rates, inflation, or the economic cycle.

The math problem

To be sure, Dalio’s framework stresses that not all debt is created equal. Borrowing for investments that generate income can be self-sustaining. But borrowing to fund consumption or to juice headline growth is not.

In the best case—a “beautiful deleveraging,” as Dalio calls it—governments balance fiscal and monetary policies so that growth outpaces interest costs, but without tipping into runaway inflation.

That’s a narrow path. Too much stimulus, and you spark inflation or currency weakness. Too much austerity, and you trigger a recession. The kind of permanent tax cuts and tariff-driven stimulus Trump is promising doesn’t fit easily into that balance.

Dalio also warned that the most misleading signals come near the top, where easy credit boosts spending, asset prices climb, unemployment falls.

Today, asset prices are at or near record highs (major indexes hit new all-time highs this week) and unemployment remains low at 4.3% as of August. 

 “When the limits of debt growth relative to income growth are reached,” Dalio wrote, “the process works in reverse…a vicious, self-reinforcing contraction.”

Trump insists that trillions in new investment are flowing in, the trade deficit is shrinking, and the nation is flush enough to consider mailing out checks. 

“Nobody thought it was possible to do so quickly—except me,” he said.

But Dalio’s work suggests that’s exactly the mindset that gets countries into trouble. Believing that debt doesn’t matter because growth will take care of it is the last stage of the cycle, when optimism runs ahead of reality. And when the illusion breaks, the “beautiful” part of deleveraging rarely lasts.

As Dalio put it: “When promises to deliver money (i.e., debt) can’t rise any more relative to the money and credit coming in, the process works in reverse and deleveraging begins.”

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

特朗普 雷·达利奥 债务周期 经济增长 财政政策 货币政策 通货膨胀 经济衰退 资产泡沫 Trump Ray Dalio Debt Cycle Economic Growth Fiscal Policy Monetary Policy Inflation Recession Asset Bubble
相关文章