Physics World 10月03日 00:08
科学界呼吁保障科研评审公正性
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

近60个美国科学学会联名致信美国政府,呼吁在拨款过程中“维护同行评审的公正性”。此举是对特朗普政府一项行政命令的回应,该命令将审查和授予政府新拨款的责任置于各机构负责人手中。该行政命令指出,部分过往拨款未与政府当前政策一致,并称2024年美国国家科学基金会(NSF)超过四分之一的新拨款被用于“多元化、公平和包容”以及“其他极端左翼倡议”。科学界担忧此举可能导致联邦资助研究的政治化,增加研究者和机构的行政负担,从而减缓甚至阻碍关键科学研究的进展。

🔬 **保障评审公正性**:近60个美国科学学会联名致信政府,核心诉求是维护科研拨款过程中同行评审的公正性,反对潜在的政治干预,确保评审过程的客观与独立。

🏛️ **行政命令引发担忧**:特朗普政府的行政命令将拨款审查权交给机构负责人,并指出部分过往拨款涉及“多元化、公平和包容”及“极端左翼倡议”,引发科学界对研究方向被政治化、意识形态化的广泛担忧。

📈 **增加行政负担与阻碍创新**:科学团体认为,新的审查机制将显著增加研究人员和机构的行政负担,可能导致关键科学研究的进程被延缓甚至停止,不利于国家科技创新和发展。

🤝 **寻求合作与对话**:尽管存在分歧,科学界表示“热切希望”与国会及政府合作,共同探讨如何加强科学体系,确保联邦资助的研究符合国家利益,同时又不牺牲科学研究的自由和严谨性。

Almost 60 US scientific societies have signed a letter calling on the US government to “safeguard the integrity” of the peer-review process when distributing grants. The move is in to response to an executive order issued by the Trump administration in August that places accountability for reviewing and awarding new government grants in the hands of agency heads.

The executive order – Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking – calls on each agency head to “designate a senior appointee” to review new funding announcements and to “review discretionary grants to ensure that they are consistent with agency priorities and the national interest.”

The order outlines several previous grants that it says have not aligned with the Trump administration’s current policies, claiming that in 2024 more than a quarter of new National Science Foundation (NSF) grants went to diversity, equity, and inclusion and what it calls “other far-left initiatives”.

“These NSF grants included those to educators that promoted Marxism, class warfare propaganda, and other anti-American ideologies in the classroom, masked as rigorous and thoughtful investigation,” the order states. “There is a strong need to strengthen oversight and coordination of, and to streamline, agency grantmaking to address these problems, prevent them from recurring, and ensure greater accountability for use of public funds more broadly.”

Increasing burdens

In response, the 58 agencies – including the American Physical Society, the American Astronomical Society, the Biophysical Society, the American Geophysical Union and SPIE – have written to the majority and minority leaders of the US Senate and House of Representatives, to voice their concerns that the order “raises the possibility of politicization” in federally funded research.

“Our nation’s federal grantmaking ecosystem serves as the gold standard for supporting cutting-edge research and driving technological innovation worldwide,” the letters states. “Without the oversight traditionally applied by appropriators and committees of jurisdiction, this [order] will significantly increase administrative burdens on both researchers and agencies, slowing, and sometimes stopping altogether, vital scientific research that our country needs.”

The letter says more review and oversight is required by the US Congress before the order should go into effect, adding that the scientific community “is eager” to work with congress and the Trump administration “to strengthen our scientific enterprise”.

The post US scientific societies blast Trump administration’s plan to politicize grants appeared first on Physics World.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

科研拨款 同行评审 科学政策 行政命令 政治化 US scientific societies grant funding peer review science policy executive order politicization
相关文章