Second Brain: Crafted, Curated, Connected, Compounded on 10月02日
AI写作时代,手动写作更显重要
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

在AI写作日益普及的今天,手动写作的重要性愈发凸显。许多人认为,AI生成的文本往往缺乏灵魂和个性,无法传达人类独特的思想和情感。相比之下,手动写作更能体现作者的个性和创造力,使作品更具感染力和价值。虽然AI写作在某些方面可以提供便利,但对于需要深度思考和情感投入的创作来说,手动写作仍然是不可或缺的。在AI写作时代,坚持手动写作不仅是对个人能力的提升,也是对创作精神的坚守。

📝 手动写作更能体现作者的个性和创造力,使作品更具感染力和价值。AI生成的文本往往缺乏灵魂和个性,无法传达人类独特的思想和情感。

🚗 AI写作就像自动挡汽车,虽然方便快捷,但缺乏手动挡的个性和掌控感。手动写作则更像手动挡,需要作者亲自掌控创作过程,才能更好地表达思想和情感。

🤔 AI写作可以提供便利,但对于需要深度思考和情感投入的创作来说,手动写作仍然是不可或缺的。AI写作无法替代人类的思想和情感,这是其无法逾越的局限。

🌟 在AI写作时代,坚持手动写作不仅是对个人能力的提升,也是对创作精神的坚守。手动写作能够帮助作者更好地思考、表达和创造,从而提升作品的质量和价值。

🔍 人类写作的精髓在于分享个人经验和体验,而AI写作则缺乏这种灵魂。手动写作能够更好地传达作者的思想和情感,使作品更具感染力和价值。

In times of AI Writing, writing manually is more important than ever. As with many AI Generated texts, I’d rather see the prompts, it would have more soul and character than the output.

I couldn’t agree more with the sentiment of

I’d rather read the prompt by Clayton Ramsey

Writing yourself, writing manually is much nicer, to hear your unfiltered thoughts, than condensing them through an LLM, and get average-sounding sentences with no soul. To me, LLM writing is soulless. I even started to turn to Grammarly and Copilot, as these were a mere distraction to the actual task at hand: writing. Instead of writing, I was constantly grammar fixing, and ultimately, nothing got done. Bsky

My experience is in writing, every time I use it for a bigger task (re-structure, or telling me the missing chapters), it does a very average and most importantly, distracting task for me. Instead of following my headspace, I am now adding some averaged chapters that can be found everywhere.

Also from Clayton’s article above:

I would rather see than the original prompt. The resulting output has less substance than the prompt and lacks any human vision in its creation. The whole point of making creative work is to share one’s own experience - if there’s no experience to share, why bother?

If it’s not worth writing, it’s not worth reading.

A great analogy found on Hackernews “Using an LLM to do schoolwork is like taking a forklift to the gym”.

If all we were interested in was moving the weights around, you’d be right to use a tool to help you. But we’re doing this work for the effect it will have on you. The reason a teacher asks you a question is not because they don’t know the answer." HN

More on Will AI replace Humans.

# Like Driving A Car

Is writing manual like driving a car manually, instead of automatic? At first, I thought yes. But on the contrary, shifting automatic is a convenience that benefits only those who drive the car. The similarities are that both are faster, easier, and do an average job. However, the quality of automatic shifting is much superior to average AI-generated content. AI models are probabilities and are not made for writing. Yes they can write, but, they all sound the same, see How to detect AI Writing.

And with AI writing, we don’t do it for ourselves; we do it to share or impress others. If we only do it for ourselves, why wouldn’t we write it ourselves?

It’s not yes or no, but it’s a bit a nuanced difference. In shifting gears, you don’t need to have character or soul. If you are a race driver, you might shift to be much more efficient and better for each situation. If you go up, shift faster; if you go down, keep a low gear to make the motor break instead of breaking. So there’s some nuance, but it’s more simplicity whereas writing is Art, a way of communication. And much more than just shifting a gear. #thoughtoftoday


Origin: ChangeLog Podcast newsletter by Jerod Santo.
References: AI Writing
Created 2025-05-06

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI写作 手动写作 创作精神 个性表达 思想情感
相关文章