Second Brain: Crafted, Curated, Connected, Compounded on 10月02日
ChatGPT对学习的影响研究
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

一项元分析研究显示,ChatGPT对学生的学习表现、学习感知和高级思维有显著提升作用。研究发现,ChatGPT能显著提高学习表现(g = 0.867),增强学习感知(g = 0.456),并促进高级思维发展(g = 0.457)。然而,研究也指出,长期过度依赖ChatGPT可能导致学生大脑学习/思维肌肉退化,因此需适度使用。

📚研究表明,ChatGPT能显著提高学生的学习表现,包括成绩和知识掌握程度,尤其在STEM相关课程中效果最显著。

🤔ChatGPT在扮演“智能导师”角色时,对促进高级思维(如批判性思维和问题解决能力)发展有显著作用,但需适度使用以避免思维退化。

⏳研究显示,短期使用(8周以内)ChatGPT对学生学习有积极影响,但超过8周后,其对学习表现的提升效果会略有下降,提示需避免长期过度依赖。

🔄长期依赖ChatGPT可能导致学生大脑学习肌肉退化,正如过度依赖手机导致记忆电话号码能力下降一样,因此需平衡AI辅助与自主思考的关系。

🧠研究指出,ChatGPT能有效激发学生对特定领域的深度兴趣,从而促进更深层次的学习,但关键在于如何引导学生在AI辅助下保持主动思考。

ChatGPT and other LLM tend to disallow people to think and learn. My main concern is, if you use LLMs all the time, you run on auto pilot, and you tend to not learn and not think anymore (see more on Will AI replace Humans).

# Study made on Learning

Here’s a study The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis by Jin Wang & Wenxiang Fan which tends to say otherwise:

    A large positive impact on improving learning performance (g = 0.867)A moderately positive impact on enhancing learning perception (g = 0.456)A moderately positive impact on fostering higher-order thinking (g = 0.457)

Rather than reducing thinking, the evidence suggests ChatGPT can actually enhance it when used appropriately.

The analysis shows that ChatGPT’s effectiveness in fostering higher-order thinking varies by:

    Type of course - with the strongest impact in STEM-related coursesRole of ChatGPT - with the most significant impact when it functions as an “intelligent tutor”

This higher order thinking is something I could understand, if you deeply interested in something, you can actually learn more by asking ChatGPT. But if you always do it, I would argue that over a long time, your brain won’t learn to think/learn anymore. As we didn’t learn to remember phone numbers anymore, as we don’t train that anymore.

But the questions is: How long was the study applied too? Because I believe, the effect comes only true if you used LLMs for months and months, as your thining pattern changes, as we don’t train the muscle of learning/thinking anymore; but instead just type into ChatGPT.

The studies were categorized by duration as:

    Less than 1 week: 8 studies1-4 weeks: 12 studies4-8 weeks: 17 studiesMore than 8 weeks: 7 studies

The majority of studies (36 out of 44) were conducted for 8 weeks or less, with only 7 studies examining effects beyond 8 weeks. This is a limitation when considering potential long-term impacts on thinking patterns in my opinion.

when the usage period exceeds eight weeks, the positive effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance slightly declines

This is what I mean, that the prolonged use of ChatGPT can lead students to become overly reliant on the AI tool, and thus they may neglect to reinforce the knowledge they have learned.


Origin: Marcel Salathe on LinkedIn
References: Don’t use AI for everything, you stop thinking-learning AI Use
Created 2025-05-13

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

ChatGPT 人工智能 学习影响 高级思维 元分析
相关文章