Fortune | FORTUNE 10月02日
Friend.com:用AI重塑友谊,还是带来风险?
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

Friend.com正以其大胆的广告攻势和创新的AI可穿戴设备Friend Pendant,引发关于人工智能与人际关系界限的热烈讨论。该设备通过麦克风和AI技术,旨在成为用户的“最亲密知己”,但其高昂的营销成本、模糊的盈利模式以及隐藏在服务条款中的数据隐私问题,引发了广泛的担忧和批评。尽管创始人Avi Schiffmann视广告被涂鸦为“艺术上的肯定”,并将其视为文化时刻的催化剂,但批评者将其与历史上的危险产品类比,质疑其安全性和长远影响。

💡 **Friend.com的AI友谊概念与市场策略:** Friend.com推出的AI可穿戴设备Friend Pendant,通过集成麦克风和Google Gemini AI,旨在成为用户“最亲密的知己”。其创始人Avi Schiffmann不惜投入巨资进行市场推广,包括在纽约地铁和洛杉矶公交站投放大量广告,甚至将广告被涂鸦视为一种“艺术上的肯定”,认为这是受众参与和完成作品的表现,以此来制造文化话题,引发人们对人工智能时代友谊定义的思考。

💰 **高昂成本与模糊的商业模式:** 尽管Friend Pendant的销量和收入与其高昂的制造成本和营销支出相比显得微薄,创始人Avi Schiffmann似乎并不将盈利放在首位。他坦承产品的使用成本极高,并将公司的未来发展寄希望于引发一场关于数字时代人际关系的广泛讨论,而非短期内的财务回报。目前的商业模式尚在探索中,潜在的收入来源包括配件、保险和订阅服务。

🔒 **隐私与法律风险的担忧:** Friend Pendant的服务条款中包含“生物识别数据同意”等敏感条款,允许公司被动收集音频、视频以及面部和语音数据,并用于训练AI。此外,条款还要求用户放弃陪审团审判、集体诉讼等权利,将争议提交仲裁。创始人对此的解释是产品本身的独特性和规避法律风险的策略,但他承认未来可能面临法律诉讼。关于数据存储,他强调数据与设备的强绑定性,设备损坏将导致数据永久丢失。

🤔 **社会与学术界的质疑:** 尽管Friend.com试图通过其产品和服务创造一种新型的“数字友谊”,但社会各界对其安全性和伦理问题提出了严峻的质疑。有评论将其与20世纪初含放射性物质的“健康饰品”类比,担忧在缺乏充分证据证明其安全性和益处的情况下,将“亲密机器”仓促推向市场。这种担忧也反映了对AI硬件产品(如Humane AI Pin和Rabbit R1)市场表现不佳的普遍怀疑。

If you take the subway in New York City, or drive a car in Los Angeles, you’ve seen the ads for friend.com.

“I’ll binge the entire series with you.”
“I’ll never leave dirty dishes in the sink.”
“I’ll never bail on dinner plans.”

The slogans are simple, intimate, needy and impossible to avoid. Friend.com is the biggest campaign in the New York City subway this year, according to OUTFRONT, an MTA billboard marketing agency. 

The AI wearable has 11,000 “always on” advertisements in the MTA, some covering a whole train station. Avi Schiffmann, the 22-year-old founder and creator of Friend, told Fortune that it cost him $1 million —an enormous outlay for a startup with barely $7 million in venture capital.

The product itself is simple: a microphone, a Bluetooth chip, and an always-listening mode that pings Google’s Gemini AI to generate responses and store “memories” in a visual graph. The pendant is manufactured in Toronto and marketed as “your closest confidant.” About 3,000 units have been sold, with 1,000 shipped so far, generating roughly $348,000 in revenue—much of which, Schiffman said, was burned on manufacturing and marketing. “I don’t have that much money left,” he admitted.

But Schiffmann doesn’t care about the skeptics, or even about profitability. “Profitability is ideal,” he says, “but right now it costs me an unfathomable amount of money if you actually use the product.” 

Schiffmann said he sees Friend as “an expression of my early 20s” — down to the materials. He obsessed over the fidget-friendly circular shape, pushed his industrial designers to copy the paper stock of one of his favorite CDs for the user manual, and insisted the packaging be printed only in English and French—because he’s French.

“You can ask about any aspect of it, and I can tell you a specific detail,” he said. “It’s just what I like and what I don’t like … an amalgamation of my tastes at this point in time.”

Victoria Mottesheard, a vice president of marketing at Outfront, the billboard marketing agency Schiffmann worked with for the advertisements, told Fortune the campaign was “taking over”  the Gotham underworld, as well as over 500 bus shelters in Los Angeles.

“Everyone’s talking about it,” Mottesheard said.

And they are – but not necessarily in a positive light. Within days, the posters became a magnet for graffiti. Some doodles were harmless, but plenty look like protest art: “AI doesn’t care if you live or die.” “Surveillance capitalism.” “AI will promote suicide if prompted.” Posts about the ads, and the graffiti, are everywhere on social media.

Most founders would cringe at that kind of backlash, but Schiffmann called it “artistically validating.” The white space in the ads was intentional, he claimed—the vandalism was part of the plan. “The audience completes the work,” he said, beaming. “Capitalism is the greatest artistic medium.”

To Schiffmann, the vandalized billboards aren’t defacement: they’re proof that his subway takeover is working exactly as intended. The goal, he says, isn’t just to sell a $129 AI pendant. It’s to provoke a cultural moment about what counts as friendship in the age of artificial intelligence.

The fine print

First, though, comes the fine print. The AI version of a friend comes with more than just packaging and a charger — it has paperwork. Friend’s terms require waiving the right to jury trials, class actions, and court proceedings, funneling disputes into arbitration in San Francisco. Buried within are clauses on “biometric data consent,” which grant the company permission to passively record audio and video, collect facial and voice data, and use these to train AI.

Schiffmann’s answer to the legal fine print is that Friend is a weird, first-of-its-kind product, so the terms are intentionally heavy. He told me the TOS is “a bit extreme” by design—“so I don’t have to keep editing it”—and that with a three-person team and pricey lawyers he’s avoiding extra legal exposure. (He said he’s not selling in Europe to duck the regulatory headache.)

He expects a fight eventually: “I think one day we’ll probably be sued, and we’ll figure it out. It’ll be really cool to see.”

He frames the “always listening” bits as speaker attribution, not surveillance.

“Technically, it’s not recording stuff — it’s really for an AI, not for a human,” he said. The pendant has a mic and, he claims, only listens when you feel the haptics; if the phone disconnects, “it’s not recording,” and they aren’t caching audio for later upload. He also said they’re not training models on user data right now: “Google’s not doing that for the API, and we’re not doing that… We’re saying it [in the TOS] so we’re covered, but we’re not doing it yet.”

On storage and access, he leans hard on the device as the gate. He described Friend as “a living YubiKey,” with the encryption key baked into the pendant itself; without it, “your data is completely inaccessible.”

Hence his blunt line: “If I smash your Friend with a hammer, your data is gone forever.” (He even told me a journalist’s husband actually smashed her pendant — which, by his design, nuked the memories.)

That swagger is part of the appeal for investors. Friend has raised money from Pace Capital, Caffeinated Capital, and Solana’s Yakovenko and Gokal, among others. The business model is still in flux—Schiffmann has floated accessories, AppleCare-style insurance, maybe subscriptions—but for now it’s all about attention. 

“I purchased the zeitgeist,” he said of the subway buy. He compares his subway tunnels to an “international destination” for AI culture, insisting the graffiti proves he’s succeeded.

Critics see something different. Suresh Venkatasubramanian, director for technology responsibility at Brown University, said that Friend is clearly an example of a frothy AI company, but he said it also bore a “pernicious” resemblance to a mostly forgotten early-20th-century fad: “radium necklaces.”

When Marie Curie’s glowing discovery of a new element first hit the market, jewelers embedded radium in pendants and bracelets and sold them as chic wellness accessories — until decades later, when people started dying of cancer.

“I look at Friend and I think, are we making the same mistake?” Venkatasubramanian told Fortune. “We’re rushing these intimacy-machines into people’s lives with no evidence they’re safe, or even helpful.”

The critique echoes larger skepticism in Silicon Valley, where hardware plays like Humane’s AI Pin and Rabbit’s R1 have already flopped. 

Avi Schiffmann, wunderkind

​​Schiffmann, since he was a teenager, has always had a knack for drawing spectacle. At just 17, he made the COVID-19 tracking website that tens of millions used each day, winning a Webby Award handed to him by Anthony Fauci. He dropped out of Harvard after one semester to build a refugee-housing site during the Ukraine war, claiming to connect 100,000 Ukrainians with homes. He’s spun up similar projects for earthquake victims in Turkey and for Black Lives Matter protests. Those quick, high-profile moves have given him a kind of bulletproof confidence. 

“You can just do things,” he told Fortune last year. “I don’t think I’m any smarter than anyone else, I just don’t have as much fear.”

Schiffmann claims the median user sends 238 messages a day to their pendant — more messages than you’d send to someone you’re dating, he noted. He frames this not as a productivity tool but as the dawn of “post-AGI companies,” building emotional products instead of utilitarian ones.

“My plans are measured in centuries,” he said with a smirk.

For now, though, Friend’s reality is glitchier. When a Fortune reporter tried it, it had lag, forgetfulness, random disconnections. Wired mocked its “annoying personality,”  which was modeled after Schiffmann, and he conceded he “lobotomized” the AI after complaints.

“Not everyone wants to be my friend,” he said.

“You’re not going to change the world that much if you make it slightly easier to order a pizza,” he said. “The future is digital relationships.”

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Friend.com AI 人工智能 可穿戴设备 隐私 友谊 科技伦理 Wearable Tech AI Ethics Friendship
相关文章