Senators Josh Hawley and Richard Blumenthal are once again stepping into the AI spotlight, this time with a bill that aims to create a federal program to evaluate the risks of advanced artificial intelligence systems.
According to Axios, the Artificial Intelligence Risk Evaluation Act would set up a program at the Department of Energy to gather data on potential AI disasters—think rogue systems, security breaches, or weaponization by adversaries.
It sounds almost like science fiction, but the concerns are all too real.
And here’s the kicker: developers would be required to submit their models for review before deployment.
That’s a sharp contrast to the usual “move fast and break things” Silicon Valley mantra. It reminds me of how, just a few months back, California passed a landmark AI law focusing on consumer safety and transparency.
Both efforts point to a broader movement—government finally tightening the reins on a tech that’s been sprinting ahead of regulation.
What really struck me, though, is how bipartisan this push has become. You’d think Hawley and Blumenthal would agree on little, yet here they are singing the same tune about the risks of AI.
And it’s not their first rodeo; earlier this year, they teamed up on a proposal to shield content creators from AI-generated replicas of their work.
Clearly, they see AI as a double-edged sword—capable of creativity and chaos in equal measure.
But here’s where it gets messy. The White House has signaled that over-regulation might dampen innovation and put the U.S. behind in its AI race with China.
That tug-of-war—safety versus speed—echoes what I heard at the recent Snapdragon Summit, where chipmakers flaunted AI-driven laptops and hyped “agentic AI” like it was the next industrial revolution.
The tech world is charging ahead, and policymakers are scrambling to catch up.
Here’s my two cents: it’s refreshing to see lawmakers at least trying to wrestle with these questions before catastrophe strikes.
Sure, bills like this won’t fix everything, and they might even slow down a few flashy rollouts.
But can we really afford another “social media moment” where we realize the risks only after the damage is done?
I’d argue that common-sense oversight, like this proposal suggests, is less about stifling progress and more about ensuring that progress doesn’t come back to bite us.
So, what’s next? If this bill gains traction, we could see the Department of Energy become the unexpected gatekeeper of AI safety.
And if it fizzles, well, Silicon Valley gets a longer leash. Either way, one thing is clear: AI has officially moved from tech blogs to the Senate floor, and it’s not going back.
