Why AI systems might never be secure. The Economist have a new piece out about LLM security, with this headline and subtitle:

Why AI systems might never be secure

A “lethal trifecta” of conditions opens them to abuse

I talked with their AI Writer Alex Hern for this piece.

The gullibility of LLMs had been spotted before ChatGPT was even made public. In the summer of 2022, Mr Willison and others independently coined the term “prompt injection” to describe the behaviour, and real-world examples soon followed. In January 2024, for example, DPD, a logistics firm, chose to turn off its AI customer-service bot after customers realised it would follow their commands to reply with foul language.

That abuse was annoying rather than costly. But Mr Willison reckons it is only a matter of time before something expensive happens. As he puts it, “we’ve not yet had millions of dollars stolen because of this”. It may not be until such a heist occurs, he worries, that people start taking the risk seriously. The industry does not, however, seem to have got the message. Rather than locking down their systems in response to such examples, it is doing the opposite, by rolling out powerful new tools with the lethal trifecta built in from the start.

This is the clearest explanation yet I've seen of these problems in a mainstream publication. Fingers crossed relevant people with decision-making authority finally start taking this seriously!