All Content from Business Insider 09月30日 02:56
Javice因欺诈被判刑七年,曾夸大用户数量骗取1.75亿美元
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

Charlie Javice因欺诈罪被判处七年监禁,此前她曾虚报其金融科技初创公司Frank的用户数量,骗取摩根大通1.75亿美元收购。Javice在2021年将Frank出售给摩根大通时,声称其平台拥有400万年轻用户,但实际用户数从未超过30万。法官认为Javice的行为“需要极大的欺骗性”,但同时也肯定了她过去的一些善举。检方曾寻求12年监禁和3亿美元的赔偿,最终判决包括七年监禁和三年监督释放。

⚖️ 法院判处Charlie Javice七年监禁,并处以三年监督释放。此判决源于她被判犯有的欺诈罪,即在2021年将她的学生金融援助初创公司Frank出售给摩根大通时,故意夸大了其用户数量。Javice声称Frank拥有400万用户,但实际用户数远低于此,从未超过30万,这构成了欺骗行为。

💰 欺诈行为使Javice骗取了摩根大通1.75亿美元的收购款。她被判犯有串谋、电汇和银行欺诈罪。检方曾要求判处12年监禁并处以3亿美元的赔偿,以弥补“巨大的受害者损失”。Javice本人据称从中获利2900万美元。

😔 Javice在庭审中表达了悔意,称自己“不应该走上这条路”,并为自己的错误行为向摩根大通、Frank的员工和投资者道歉。她表示“没有一天不重温我的错误,寻找意义”,并“没有一天不感到深深的悔恨”。

💡 法官Alvin Hellerstein在量刑时承认Javice“做了善事”,但强调“需要警示他人”。法官驳斥了Javice律师提出的摩根大通在收购中也犯有错误,以及Javice值得减刑的论点,认为她的悔意并未完全承认犯罪行为。

Charlie Javice arriving at a lower Manhattan federal courthouse for her sentencing hearing. Javice was found guilty of fraud for artificially inflating her customer numbers while selling her company to JP Morgan Chase for $175 million.

A Manhattan federal judge has sentenced Charlie Javice to 7 years in prison for using wildly exaggerated user data to trick the country's biggest bank, JPMorgan Chase, into paying $175 million for her student financial aid startup, Frank.

Javice's prison sentence will be followed by 3 years of supervised release, resulting in a total 10-year sentence.

The former fintech wunderkind — an alum of Forbes' 30 Under 30 list, she scored a one-on-one meeting with JPMC's powerful CEO, Jamie Dimon, during the 2021 sale negotiations — may also pay restitution.

US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein said Javice's crimes "required a great deal of duplicity," but that she was "a good person who has done good deeds."

"I don't think you will be committing any crimes, and I think you will be devoting your life to service," Hellerstein told Javice. "But others need to be deterred."

Javice was convicted in March of conspiracy, wire, and bank fraud for using bogus user-base data to claim Frank — a platform that streamlined the federal financial aid application process, along with offering career and financial advice — had stockpiled the contact information for 4 million users. In fact, Frank never had more than 300,000 users.

Fighting back tears at Monday's sentencing hearing, Javice, who is 32, said she wishes she could tell her younger self to take a different path.

"At 28, I did something that runs against the grain of my upbringing and every lesson I once claimed to have learned," she said.

She implored forgiveness from JP Morgan investors whom she defrauded and from Frank employees and investors "whose name, career, or future was in some way stained by proximity to me."

"Not a day goes by that I do not replay my mistakes, searching for meaning," Javice said. "Not a day passes that I do not feel profound remorse."

Prosecutors in the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York had sought a 12-year prison sentence and $300 million in restitution.

The hefty sum would compensate for the "enormous victim loss," prosecutors argued.

Prosecutors said Javice pocketed $29 million of the $175 million Frank sale herself, while her defense lawyers put the figure closer to $21 million.

JPMorgan Chase had seen great marketing potential in Frank's massive database of 4 million users, according to trial testimony. The bank wanted to use the contact information to pitch checking accounts, credit cards, and other banking products to college-age users at the start of their lifelong financial journeys.

"Based on the defendant's lies, JPMC projected it could generate more than $500 million in revenue from selling banking products to Frank's customers," prosecutors argued.

"Had JPMC known the truth — that Frank had only a few hundred thousand users — the bank would not have acquired Frank," they wrote.

Javice had hoped to get a break in both prison time and restitution by admitting wrongdoing and trying to convince the judge that the JPMorgan Chase-Frank merger was not a complete loss for the bank.

"Regardless of the number of users, Frank had real value," her lawyers argued pre-sentencing.

Hellerstein had little patience with an argument from Javice's lawyers that he should take into account JPMorgan's mistake in buying Frank. According to Javice's attorney, Ronald Sullivan Jr., JPMorgan made a mistake by rushing to purchase the startup before any competitors could buy it.

"A fraud remains a fraud whether you outsmart someone who is smart or someone who is a fool," Hellerstein said.

Hellerstein also rebutted Javice's claim that she deserved a sentencing break for admitting she did something wrong.

"She said she made a mistake," the judge said of her letter to him. "She doesn't admit she committed a crime. I don't think it's an acceptance of responsibility."

In Monday's sentencing hearing, Sullivan praised Javice's good deeds that "were not in the newspapers" and implored the judge to take them into consideration.

According to Sullivan — citing a sheaf of letters from family, friends, and acquaintances who wrote to support Javice — the Frank founder assisted seriously ill family members, quietly paid grocery bills for people who were struggling, and gave opportunities to people who are traditionally excluded from certain career paths. He asked for 18 months of prison time.

"We think that that is more in line with what is fair for a woman who has done good for most of her life," Sullivan said.

This is a developing story; please check back for updates.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Charlie Javice Frank JPMorgan Chase 欺诈 金融科技 判刑 Fraud Fintech Sentencing
相关文章