Deeplinks 09月29日 10:49
社交媒体对堕胎信息内容审查引担忧
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文聚焦于电子前沿基金会(EFF)“停止审查堕胎”活动发现的社交媒体平台对堕胎相关内容进行不当审查的问题。文章以“流产与堕胎热线”(M+A Hotline)为例,该组织在Instagram上分享关于药物流产的教育信息和支持服务时,遭遇了大量内容被删除和账号功能受限。尽管M+A Hotline并未涉及药品买卖,却被Meta平台以违反“非法或管制商品销售”的规定为由进行处罚。文章指出,Meta的社区标准中对堕胎内容的提及甚少,但实际执行中却存在极高的审查力度,且申诉机制效率低下,缺乏透明度。EFF呼吁Meta平台在执行社区标准时更加准确、一致和透明,特别是在涉及生殖健康信息时,确保医疗专业人士的教育性内容不被不当压制,并提供有效的申诉渠道,以应对日益严峻的网络信息审查挑战。

🌐 **社交媒体平台内容审查问题凸显**:电子前沿基金会(EFF)的“停止审查堕胎”活动揭示了社交媒体平台在处理堕胎相关内容时存在不当审查的普遍现象。文章以“流产与堕胎热线”(M+A Hotline)为例,该组织在Instagram上提供关于药物流产的教育和支持信息时,遭遇了大量内容被删除和账号功能受限,这表明即使是提供合法医疗信息的组织也可能面临审查风险。

⚖️ **Meta平台执行标准存疑**:M+A Hotline因被指违反“非法或管制商品销售”的社区标准而受到处罚,尽管该组织仅提供教育信息而非药品交易。Meta官方虽声称不禁止关于药物流产的教育内容,但实际操作却显示出对堕胎相关信息的极高审查力度,其社区标准中对“堕胎”一词的提及极少,但内容审核却异常严格,存在标准执行不一致的问题。

💡 **申诉机制不足与透明度缺失**:文章强调了Meta平台在内容审核错误后的申诉机制存在严重不足。即使M+A Hotline在申诉过程中指出了平台审核的错误,其被移除的内容仍未得到恢复。这暴露了平台在处理用户申诉时缺乏透明度、效率低下以及未能有效纠正错误,给用户带来了不便和困扰,尤其是在信息传播至关重要的生殖健康领域。

📢 **呼吁平台改进与信息保障**:EFF呼吁Meta平台在执行社区标准时必须更加准确、一致和透明,特别是在涉及生殖健康信息时。平台应明确界定并公平执行其标准,确保医疗专业人士提供的教育性内容不被不当压制,并建立有效的申诉渠道以快速纠正审核错误,从而在日益严峻的网络信息审查环境下,保障用户获取重要健康信息的权利。

This is the sixth installment in a blog series documenting EFF's findings from the Stop Censoring Abortion campaign. You can read additional posts here. 

When we started our Stop Censoring Abortion campaign, we heard from activists, advocacy organizations, researchers, and even healthcare providers who had all experienced having abortion-related content removed or suppressed on social media. One of the submissions we received was from an organization called the Miscarriage and Abortion Hotline.

The Miscarriage and Abortion Hotline (M+A Hotline) formed in 2019, is staffed by a team of healthcare providers who wanted to provide free and confidential “expert advice on various aspects of miscarriage and abortion, ensuring individuals receive accurate information and compassionate support throughout their journey.” By 2022, the hotline was receiving between 25 to 45 calls and texts a day. 

Like many reproductive health, rights, and justice groups, the M+A Hotline is active on social media, sharing posts that affirm the voices and experiences of abortion seekers, assert the safety of medication abortion, and spread the word about the expert support that the hotline offers. However, in late March of this year, the M+A Hotline’s Instagram suddenly had numerous posts taken down and was hit with restrictions that prevented the account from starting or joining livestreams or creating ads until June 25, 2025.

Screenshots provided to EFF from M+A Hotline

The reason behind the restrictions and takedowns, according to Meta, was that the M+A Hotline’s Instagram account failed to follow Meta’s guidelines on the sale of illegal or regulated goods. The “guidelines” refer to Meta’s Community Standards which dictate the types of content that are allowed on Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and Threads. But according to Meta, it is not against these Community Standards to provide guidance on how to legally access pharmaceutical drugs, and this is treated differently than an offer to buy, sell, or trade pharmaceuticals (though there are additional compliance requirements for paid ads). 

Under these rules, the M+A Hotline’s content should have been fine: The Hotline does not sell medication abortion and simply educates on the efficacy and safety of medication abortion while providing guidance on how abortion seekers could legally access the pills. Despite this, around 10 posts from the account were removed by Instagram, none of which were ads.

For how little the topic is mentioned in these Standards, content about abortion seems to face extremely high scrutiny from Meta.

In a letter to Amnesty International in February 2024, Meta publicly clarified that organic content on its platforms that educates users about medication abortion is not in violation of the Community Standards. The company claims that the policies are “based on feedback from people and the advice of experts in fields like technology, public safety and human rights.” The Community Standards are thorough and there are sections covering everything from bullying and harassment to account integrity to restricted goods and services. Notably, within the several webpages that make up the Community Standards, there are very few mentions of the words “abortion” and “reproductive health.” For how little the topic is mentioned in these Standards, content about abortion seems to face extremely high scrutiny from Meta.

Screenshots provided to EFF from M+A Hotline

Not only were posts removed, but even after further review, many were not restored. The M+A Hotline was once again told that their content violates the Community Standards on drugs. While it’s understandable that moderation systems may make mistakes, it’s unacceptable for those mistakes to be repeated consistently with little transparency or direct communication with the users whose speech is being restricted and erased. This problem is only made worse by lack of helpful recourse. As seen here, even when users request review and identify these moderation errors, Meta may still refuse to restore posts that are permitted under the Community Standards.

The removal of the M+A Hotline’s educational content demonstrates that Meta must be more accurate, consistent, and transparent in the enforcement of their Community Standards, especially in regard to reproductive health information. Informing users that medical professionals are available to support those navigating a miscarriage or abortion is plainly not an attempt to buy or sell pharmaceutical drugs. Meta must clearly defineand then fairly enforce–what is and isn’t permitted under its Standards. This includes ensuring there is a meaningful way to quickly rectify any moderation errors through the review process. 

At a time when attacks on online access to information—and particularly abortion information—are intensifying, Meta must not exacerbate the problem by silencing healthcare providers and suppressing vital health information. We must all continue to fight back against online censorship.

 This is the sixth post in our blog series documenting the findings from our Stop Censoring Abortion campaign. Read more in the series: https://www.eff.org/pages/stop-censoring-abortion

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

社交媒体审查 堕胎信息 内容审核 电子前沿基金会 Meta 生殖健康 平台政策 Social Media Censorship Abortion Information Content Moderation EFF Meta Reproductive Health Platform Policy
相关文章