New Yorker 09月26日 06:05
纽约电影节:经典修复与当代视角
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

纽约电影节作为年度影坛盛事,虽因热门影片商业发行提前而带有预映性质,但其魅力不减。节日期间,林肯中心汇聚了浓厚的电影氛围,观众的热情参与营造了如同朝圣般的观影体验。今年的亮点包括修复版经典影片,如埃里希·冯·施特劳斯的《皇后凯莉》,以及聚焦当代生活议题的纪录片和剧情片。影片类型涵盖了对旧世界文化压迫的深入探讨,如《卡罗尔与乔伊》中的母女关系,以及《你认为大自然怎么样》中对青年浪漫的家庭审视。此外,还有关于个人压力与内心挣扎的心理剧《如果我有腿,我会踢翻它》,以及在历史背景下展现个体命运的《秘密特工》。

🎥 **经典修复影片重现光辉**:今年的纽约电影节特别展映了修复版的经典影片,其中埃里希·冯·施特劳斯的《皇后凯莉》(1929)尤为引人注目。这部影片不仅因其大胆的性与权力主题而充满张力,更因其充满争议的制作历史而成为焦点。修复后的版本保留了其华丽的视觉风格和令人不安的叙事,展现了其作为一部大师级作品的生命力,同时也反映了其导演生涯的终结。

🎭 **当代视角下的家庭与文化**:电影节也呈现了多部聚焦当代社会议题的作品。例如,纪录片《卡罗尔与乔伊》通过演员卡罗尔·凯恩与其年迈母亲的互动,展现了个人经历中的文化规范与自由精神的冲突。而洪尚秀的《你认为大自然怎么样》则以细腻的笔触,刻画了年轻情侣在面对父母盘问时,关于经济前景和艺术抱负的紧张对话,揭示了家庭压力下的复杂情感。

💡 **心理困境与历史叙事**:在心理层面,《如果我有腿,我会踢翻它》通过一位身兼多职的治疗师的故事,展现了她在应对孩子重病、丈夫长期不在家以及自身职业困境等多重压力下的崩溃边缘。而在更宏大的历史背景下,巴西导演克莱伯·门东萨·菲略的《秘密特工》则在1977年军事独裁统治时期,描绘了一位科学家为逃避政府追捕而采取极端手段,影片通过跳跃的时间线和多线叙事,深刻探讨了身份认同与历史 legacy。

🎬 **节日氛围与观众参与**:尽管许多影片的商业发行提前,但纽约电影节依然成功营造了浓厚的电影文化氛围。林肯中心成为了影迷聚集的热点,观众的热情参与不仅为节日增添了活力,也构成了一种“同道中人”的社群感,使得观影体验更具仪式感和共享性。

The New York Film Festival, the centerpiece of the city’s year in cinephilia, is a victim of its own success. Many of its most noteworthy films are already scheduled for commercial release soon—which is cause for celebration, insofar as they’ll be seen more widely and more affordably and will even make their way to streaming platforms far from where art-houses bloom. But, as a result, the festival screenings do take on the tone of an early-access preview rather than a chance to be seized. Nonetheless, the event’s atmosphere reliably turns Lincoln Center into a hive of cinematic energy, and the impatient desire that draws audiences through the doors provides a sense of like-minded communicants at the movie altar.

My colleague Anthony Lane’s recent piece about the art and science of film restoration is a welcome reminder to pay attention to the N.Y.F.F.’s vigorous Revivals section, which is filled with notable new restorations, including one—Erich von Stroheim’s “Queen Kelly,” from 1929—that’s laced with bitterness both in its subject matter and in its production history. Stroheim’s bilious vision, set amid the pomp and decadence of a fictitious Middle European kingdom, tracks cruel convergences of sex and power among the royal and the downtrodden alike. The movie’s star, Gloria Swanson, plays an orphaned nun-novitiate who, during a convent outing, catches the eye of a suavely flirtatious prince (Walter Byron) who happens to be the kept man and groom-to-be of the kingdom’s madly jealous queen (Seena Owen). The outcome turns violent and leads to exile and degradation in the kingdom’s African colony. Stroheim’s demanding and fulsomely realistic methods provoked the movie’s producer, the potentate and paterfamilias Joseph Kennedy, to pull the plug on the project, thus effectively ending Stroheim’s career as a director. The surviving version, augmented with additional footage, proves the film to be a spectacular, fanatically ornamental, yet harrowing masterwork of erotic ecstasies and horrors.

The modern cinema has altogether different ways of presenting the oppressive rigidity of Old World culture, including intimate documentary filmmaking, as with Nathan Silver’s “Carol & Joy,” which is featured in the festival’s New York Shorts program. The title subjects are the actress Carol Kane and her mother—and Upper West Side roommate—Joy Kane, who’s ninety-eight and full of extraordinary stories. Joy grew up in Cleveland, where her father worked as a psychiatrist. (His parents were, she says, from “the shtetl”; her mother was Austrian.) She was raised, she explains, according to narrow norms that frustrated her free-spiritedly creative temperament and that she tried in vain to resist. Joy recounts a background of chilly order, of threats and insults and betrayals, which took her decades to overcome. Her latter-day accomplishments as a musician are highlighted in the film, along with her trenchant reflections on the spirit of liberation that lies at the heart of the artistic impulse.

Normative family pressures are cultural commonplaces far beyond European borders, and the South Korean director Hong Sangsoo dramatically foregrounds them in “What Does That Nature Say to You,” a tale of young romance subjected to sharp parental scrutiny. The drama begins with a coincidence that rests on a bedrock of design. A thirtysomething poet drives his girlfriend to the house of her parents—whom, despite a three-year relationship, he’s never met—and, in the driveway, he chances to meet her father. The two men hit it off, the poet is invited for dinner, and the inevitable interrogations ensue. Unfortunately, the young man’s father is rich and famous, a topic that the potential in-laws can’t avoid. Amid the alcohol-eased warmth of the gathering, questions regarding financial prospects and artistic ambitions are raised—and raised again and again, ever higher, to a fever pitch. Hong, with pugnacity and consummate art-house refinement, films the dinner from Hell in images of exquisite tightrope-like tension.

Mary Bronstein’s second feature, “If I Had Legs I’d Kick You” (one of the outstanding premières at Sundance earlier this year), like “Carol & Joy,” is also a mother-and-daughter drama—and a psychotherapeutic one. Rose Byrne stars as Linda, a therapist whose young daughter is chronically ill and whose husband, a sea captain, is away for long stretches, leaving her alone to deal alone with their child’s medical and emotional problems. These demands are throwing her work as a psychologist into turmoil, producing conflict with her therapist—and colleague (Conan O’Brien); meanwhile other aspects of her life are falling apart (including her house, literally). Linda endures a cosmic round of stress, matched by the movie’s hectic jangle of moods and its use of closeups of the overburdened protagonist, whose confines grow smaller as her troubles grow bigger and her fury mounts—a recipe for explosion.

In some other outstanding entries in the festival’s first week, psychological portraiture occurs through extrusion—the inner life is forced out in the form of events of historical, and even historic, significance in the wider world. These period pieces include the Brazilian director Kleber Mendonça Filho’s “The Secret Agent,” set mainly in Recife, on Brazil’s Atlantic coast, in 1977, at a time when the country was ruled by a military dictatorship. The main character is a scientist (Wagner Moura) who has run afoul of the regime and seeks out a clandestine network of sympathizers. Learning that he is being targeted by government-connected hitmen, he takes ever more extreme measures of evasion, which play tricks on his very identity. Mendonça, delighting in period artifacts and settings, boldly skips around in chronology and pulls out of the shadows a wide range of characters, most of whom have ruses of their own. The film puts its targeted hero on a teeming public stage, the tumult of the Brazilian Carnival, and also surveys him in the half-light of his own elusive legacy.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

纽约电影节 电影节 电影修复 经典电影 纪录片 剧情片 当代电影 New York Film Festival Film Festival Film Restoration Classic Cinema Documentary Narrative Film Contemporary Cinema
相关文章