Mashable 09月26日 01:16
沉浸式媒体:连接现实,促进共情
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了沉浸式媒体(如AR和VR)的力量,它能够将抽象事实转化为切身体验,从而加深理解和共情。文章以1906年亚特兰大种族屠杀的AR体验为例,说明了沉浸式技术如何超越传统媒体,带来更深刻的情感连接。尽管对技术的担忧普遍存在,但作者认为,审慎使用沉浸式工具可以帮助我们抵御信息碎片化和虚假信息,重拾注意力,并建立人与人之间的联系。通过让用户体验他人的视角,沉浸式媒体能够培养同理心,激发行动,尤其在气候变化和种族主义等议题上。文章呼吁机构、艺术家和社区团体积极参与沉浸式内容的创作,以确保技术朝着积极的方向发展,而非被商业利益主导。

💡 沉浸式媒体的独特价值:通过AR/VR等技术,沉浸式媒体能够将历史事件或抽象概念以生动、逼真的方式呈现,使观众能够“亲历”其中,从而产生比书本或电影更为深刻的情感共鸣和理解。例如,在亚特兰大种族屠杀的AR体验中,观众能直观感受到当时的暴力和恐惧,将历史的“冷事实”转化为“热感受”。

⚖️ 沉浸式媒体的双刃剑效应与审慎使用:文章承认技术可能带来的风险,如算法推送的极端内容、技术成瘾和隐私问题。然而,作者强调,不应因噎废食,而应关注其积极潜力。通过有意识的设计和应用,沉浸式媒体可以帮助人们“慢下来”,重新连接真实,抵御虚假信息,并促进跨群体间的理解和妥协,例如通过模拟不同视角来减少刻板印象。

🚀 沉浸式媒体的未来与机构的责任:随着空间计算的临近,Meta和Apple等科技巨头正积极布局。文章呼吁非营利组织、艺术家和社区团体积极拥抱这些新兴技术,参与到沉浸式内容的创作中,以确保其发展方向能够服务于公共利益,而非仅仅被商业驱动。通过支持旨在培养同理心和连接的平台和项目,可以引导沉浸式媒体成为构建更美好现实的工具。

🤝 培养共情与行动的催化剂:沉浸式体验能够将抽象议题个人化,例如通过让用户体验患有多动症的儿童、喜马拉雅的农民或菌丝网络中的孢子等视角。在信息爆炸的时代,这种短暂的“他者”体验能够播下同理心的种子,并可能转化为实际行动,尤其是在应对气候变化和种族主义等复杂挑战时。它提供了一种“慢下来”去倾听和感受的邀请。

This week marks 120 years since the 1906  Atlanta Race Massacre, when white mobs laid waste to Black‑owned businesses and lives. At SXSW this spring, I experienced that history through a phone‑based augmented‑reality installation. Standing on a downtown sidewalk, I watched a true-to-life hologram of an actor portraying Black journalist Jesse Max Barber describe the violence as it occurred. The smoke and fear felt immediate, in a way no book or film could convey. It reminded me that immersive media, used with care, can turn cold facts into felt experience.

We’re rightfully wary of technology. Algorithms feed us outrage; screens swallow our evenings. Critics warn that headsets will lure us into isolation. (WALL‑E, anyone?) That risk is real. 

But by focusing only on the dangers, are we missing the other side of the story? Immersive tools can also cut through the noise, slow us down, and connect us to truths we cannot grasp on a flat screen.

Evidence for that power is growing. Researchers found that participants who navigated a 360‑degree video simulating violent intergroup conflict became less likely to demonize the opposing side and more open to compromise. The Messy Truth, a virtual-reality series that places viewers in scenarios like racial profiling, was shown at the Conservative Political Action Conference; police officers who experienced being a Black teenager pulled over by a cop said they saw the world differently. 

These projects hint at how immersive media might help us reclaim attention and rebuild connection in an age of lies and fragmentation. When you inhabit someone else’s perspective, or even something’s perspective — a kid with ADHD, a farmer in the Himalayas, or a spore in a mycelial network — abstract issues become personal. At a time when climate change is reduced to statistics and racism to slogans, the chance to feel another life for a few minutes can seed empathy and action. I’ve been surprised at how often these experiences slow me down. They’re not adrenaline rides. They’re invitations to linger and listen.

For immersive media to meet its promise, we need more than experiments. We need institutions, artists, and community groups to build with these tools — and to do so thoughtfully. That’s why I cofounded Agog, a philanthropic institute dedicated to using emerging media to cultivate empathy and connection, and inspire action. Projects like Kinfolk Tech, which uses AR to surface hidden Black and Brown histories in public spaces and prompts 91 percent of users to share what they learn, and Electric South’s New Dimensions Lab, which supports African creators making nonfiction XR, show what’s possible. Yet most nonprofits still view XR as costly or difficult to wield. Meanwhile, tech giants are racing ahead. Meta’s Ray‑Ban Display glasses — smart frames with an AI‑powered screen that debut next week — signal that mainstream spatial computing is near. Apple’s new “Liquid Glass” design language, which uses translucent layers and parallax on phones and tablets, trains us for interfaces that live in three dimensions. If the mission-based world doesn’t join this conversation, the commercial players will set the terms.

I get the skepticism. Immersive media could be used to manipulate, to addict, to surveil. It could lull us into passivity or feed unhealthy impulses. The antidote is intention. We must ask: Does this experience reconnect us to reality or replace it? Does it foster empathy, or does it sensationalize suffering? Does it create new ways in, or push people to the margins? For example, new features in smart glasses, like real-time captions for people who are deaf or hard of hearing, or instant text-to-speech for those with visual impairments, can expand participation. That’s momentum we can build on.

As the National Center for Civil and Human Rights Museum reopens in Atlanta, and features the 1906 Race Massacre AR experience this weekend, we have a choice. We can treat immersive tech as another entertainment toy, or we can harness it to reclaim attention, relay truth, slow us down, and build connections across divides. I remain agog at the possibilities. With curiosity and care, we can ensure that immersive media doesn’t usher in a dystopia, but helps us imagine and build a better reality.

Chip Giller, along with Wendy Schmidt, is co-founder of Agog: The Immersive Media Institute, a philanthropic organization that helps people use emerging media like virtual and augmented reality tocreate human connection, cultivate empathy, and inspire action toward a brighter future for all.

This column reflects the opinions of the writer.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

沉浸式媒体 AR VR 共情 同理心 技术伦理 信息传播 Immersive Media Augmented Reality Virtual Reality Empathy Technology Ethics Information Dissemination
相关文章