本期节目深入探讨了查理·柯克（Charlie Kirk）去世后引发的社会讨论，以及由此产生的言论浪潮。节目中，主持人对被遗忘的晚餐邀请表示疑惑，并反思是否是之前的言论所致。随后，节目详细分析了柯克之死引发的争议性言论，包括埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）和汤米·罗宾逊（Tommy Robinson）的虚伪暴力呼吁，以及迈克尔·谢尔默（Michael Shermer）作为党派人士的立场。此外，节目还触及了埃里克·韦恩斯坦（Eric Weinstein）、乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）关于疫苗的辩论，以及其他“非正统”派别的内部人际戏剧。

🧐 **“被遗忘的晚餐”与言论困境**：主持人以一种幽默而略带困惑的口吻，表达了对未被邀请参加某些聚会的疑问，并将其与查理·柯克之死后出现的“言论浪潮”联系起来，暗示了当前社会环境下，观点表达的复杂性和潜在的社交隔阂。

⚔️ **对暴力呼吁的批判性审视**：节目重点分析了埃隆·马斯克和汤米·罗宾逊在查理·柯克事件后发表的言论，指出其言辞中的虚伪之处，并强调了在讨论暴力问题时应有的审慎态度。这部分内容旨在揭示公众人物在敏感事件中的言论影响。

🤔 **“非正统”派别的观点与争议**：节目深入剖析了“非正统”群体（heterodox）中一些知名人物的言论和行为，包括迈克尔·谢尔默的党派倾向、埃里克·韦恩斯坦对事件的迅速反应、乔·罗根关于疫苗的讨论，以及布雷特·韦恩斯坦和戴夫·鲁宾等人的相关动态。这部分内容旨在呈现不同观点的碰撞与分析。

⚖️ **专家身份与批评的本质**：节目探讨了专家身份的界定以及如何进行有建设性的批评，并以“Decoding the Gurus”的方法论为例，强调了研究和分析“大师”言论的重要性，区分了简单的揭穿与更深层次的理解。这部分内容触及了知识传播和批判性思维的核心议题。

🎮 **游戏与怀旧内容**：在节目结尾，主持人还分享了与游戏相关的讨论，包括“Decoding the Gamers”环节对《Qud Caves》和《Two Point Museum》的介绍，以及对早期复古游戏的怀念，如《Drug Wars》、《Beachhead》和《Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?》。这部分内容为节目增添了轻松的色彩，并展现了主持人广泛的兴趣领域。

Why are we never invited to these dinners? We wonder if it was something we said or if our invitation just got lost in the mail, as we endure the inevitable discourse wave that followed in the wake of Charlie Kirk's murder.

The full episode is available to Patreon subscribers (2 hours, 21 minutes).

Join us at: https://www.patreon.com/DecodingTheGurus

Supplementary Material 37

00:00 Introduction

01:10 Cooking Gurus?

05:39 Sensemaking Overindulgence

07:19 Feedback on The Elephant Graveyard Segment

14:07 Gary is awarded an Honorary Doctorate by SOAS

19:15 On the Murder of Charlie Kirk

24:49 Murder is Bad & Charlie Kirk was a Polemicist

38:07 Hypocritical Calls for Violence: Elon Musk and Tommy Robinson

41:32 The Superficial Celebrations of Luigi Mangione

44:52 Michael Shermer is an entirely non-skeptical partisan

47:16 Eric Weinstein and the rush to post

49:48 Joe Rogan argues with his friend on vaccines

58:11 Predictable Pivot

01:05:30 Blocked and Reported discuss the Interpersonal Psychodramas of the Heterodox

01:07:07 The Thick Skin of Michael Shellenberger

01:11:41 Being Bret Weinstein's +1

01:13:39 Dave Rubin does not appreciate public criticism

01:16:29 A Heterodox DM encounter

01:21:01 Money and Macro's Video on Gary's Economics

01:27:56 The DTG approach vs Debunking

01:29:43 The Nature of Expertise and Criticism

01:31:17 Researching Guru Claims

01:36:37 Destiny invokes the Prisoner's Dilemma and Tit for Tat strategies

01:40:59 Generous Tit for Tat

01:46:28 Konstantin Kisin's warning about alternative media

01:54:26 Konstantin's "Consistency"

02:01:44 Next Gurus and Fake Outro

02:03:44 Decoding the Gamers: Caves of Qud and Two Point Museum

02:08:11 Retro School Games: Drug Wars, Beachhead and Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?

02:11:53 Real Outro

Sources

SOAS honorary awardees for 2025What did Elon Musk say at far-right UK rally and did his remarks break the law?“We Either Fight Back or Die” – Elon Musk's Fierce Speech at London 'Unite The Kingdom' Rally | APTShermer's tweet after Charlie Kirk's murderJoe Rogan and Bryan Callen on vaccinesHe Had One Product, $80K in Funding, and One Influencer - And Unilever Just Acquired His Company for 9 FiguresMichael Shellenberger Mixed Up Two Guys With Sorta Similar Names And Falsely Told His Readers — And Congress — One Of Them Might Be A Spy As A ResultBlocked and Reported Premium: Taylor Lorenz And The Perils Of Journafluencing (Part 1)Money & Macro: Economist fact-checks Gary’s EconomicsCareful What You Click On - Konstantin KisinDestiny – The Prisoner's Dilemma Explains Destiny's TweetsRand, D. G., Ohtsuki, H., & Nowak, M. A. (2009). Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: Generous tit-for-tat prevails. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 256(1), 45–57.