New Yorker 09月19日
罗伯特·雷德福:银幕上的近乎完美与幕后的真实自我
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章回顾了已故演员罗伯特·雷德福的职业生涯,特别是他以“近乎完美”的形象深入人心。从早期与保罗·纽曼的搭档,到《赤足在公园里》中对“完美”的探讨,再到《战火》中短暂的恐惧展现,文章指出雷德福更擅长演绎沉着自持的角色。七十年代的辉煌时期,他凭借《骗中骗》、《了不起的盖茨比》等片横跨多种类型,成功塑造了“全美偶像”的形象,并被大众奉为典范。然而,影片《天生好手》的过度神化处理,以及后期作品中对雷德福的“金光闪闪”的描绘,引人思考他本人对此类溢美之词的态度。文章最后通过对比伯特·兰卡斯特和亨利·方达的职业选择,探讨了雷德福职业生涯中可能存在的“未选择之路”。

🌟 **“近乎完美”的银幕形象与内心挣扎**:文章开篇即点出罗伯特·雷德福以其英俊、得体、近乎完美的形象深入人心,尤其是在与保罗·纽曼搭档的作品中。然而,影片《赤足在公园里》中,他扮演的角色因被指责“太完美”而失控,暗示了这种完美形象背后可能存在的压力。早期在《战火》中短暂展现的恐惧,也说明了他不适合扮演情感过于外露的角色,更适合展现沉着自持的魅力。

🏆 **七十年代的辉煌与全美偶像的塑造**:在20世纪70年代,雷德福主演了多部成功的跨类型影片,如《骗中骗》、《了不起的盖茨比》等,成功地将自己塑造成了公众心目中“全美男人”的典范。他的形象被广泛模仿和赞扬,甚至成为衡量男性魅力的标准。这种巨大的公众喜爱度使得影评人难以对其进行负面评价,进一步巩固了他作为偶像的地位。

✨ **《天生好手》的神化与对溢美之词的反思**:影片《天生好手》中,雷德福饰演的棒球手罗伊·霍布斯被赋予了近乎神话般的色彩,即使受伤也依旧能创造奇迹。文章指出,这种“偶像崇拜”式的处理方式,在随后的《走出非洲》等影片中也延续,对雷德福的描绘常常带有“金光闪闪”的滤镜。这引发了对雷德福本人如何看待这些过度赞美的好奇,以及他对这种“被神化”过程的态度。

🤔 **职业选择的对比与“未选择之路”的思考**:文章通过对比伯特·兰卡斯特在《 leopard》中的粗犷魅力和亨利·方达在《西部往事》中颠覆形象的演绎,提出了对雷德福职业生涯中“未选择之路”的思考。文章猜测,拥有同样蓝宝石般眼睛的雷德福,是否会像亨利·方达那样,为了角色需要而改变自己标志性的外貌,从而探索更多元的表演可能性。

Gentleman, preferred, blond: such was the job description of Robert Redford, who died on Tuesday, at the age of eighty-nine. Onscreen, he and his buddy Paul Newman were partners in crime, in “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid” (1969) and “The Sting” (1973), though the crimes were no more wicked than practical jokes. Offscreen, the two men were good sports—friendly, athletic, devoted to decent causes, and, like most major stars, a little hard to know, keeping something back in a bid to leave us hungering for more. Both were a byword, too, for male beauty, fully alive to the almost laughable impact of their handsomeness, yet ill at ease, now and then, with their perches on the pedestal. “You’re always dressed right, you always look right, you always say the right thing. You’re very nearly perfect.” So says Jane Fonda to Redford in “Barefoot in the Park” (1967), in which they play newlyweds. “That’s a rotten thing to say,” he replies.

The pressure of perfection starts to tell on Redford’s character, Paul, who winds up drunk, in Washington Square Park, in broad daylight, tipping garbage over himself. Do we really believe in that loss of control? There’s something embarrassing in his effort to look wacky and wild; already, in the springtime of Redford’s career, he seems more at home embodying self-command. His minor role in “War Hunt” (1962) had been that of a U.S. private who quits his post during an enemy assault in Korea and huddles in the corner of a trench, his fine features seized by terror. But such emotional nakedness was unbecoming to Redford, and he knew it. When the Sundance Kid—less than a decade after “War Hunt”—confessed that he couldn’t swim, and didn’t want to jump in the river, the audience understood that his cowardice was no more than one note, amusingly off key, in an otherwise pure melody of relaxed heroism. Like the lady said, very nearly perfect.

Redford’s run of hits in the nineteen-seventies, including “Jeremiah Johnson” (1972), “The Sting,” “The Way We Were” (1973), “The Great Gatsby” (1974), “Three Days of the Condor” (1975), and “All the President’s Men” (1976), suggested a canny ability to roam across genres. The first film on the list gave Redford a beard, a rifle, and a cabin in the Rocky Mountains; the last took him to the Library of Congress and the offices of the Washington Post. As Redford instinctively grasped, one way to secure a spot as the all-American guy in the public imagination is to plant yourself in as much of America as you can. He swapped the naval uniform of “The Way We Were,” seraphically white and tailor-made to conquer Barbra Streisand, for the evening garb of Gatsby. Gradually, Redford turned into the star—our collective idea of what a leading man should do and be. People stuck his image up on walls, as if he were a saint, and welcomed him into the language. “Oh, he’s no Robert Redford,” they would say of some ungainly doofus. Movie critics were helpless, and pointless, in the face of such enormous adulation, as they had been since the era of Rudolph Valentino. When an actor charms the pants off us, nothing, especially a writer with a ballpoint pen and bad hair, can persuade us to put them back on.

Was there a turning point in Redford’s stardom, or was it just the motion of the heavens? If there was, it came with “The Natural” (1984), in which Redford played a fictional baseball player named Roy Hobbs—a middle-aged rookie, with mysterious lacunae in his past, who transforms the fortunes of a struggling New York club. Commercially, the film was another success, demonstrating that pretty much anything Redford touched would turn to gold; the trouble was that, by now, the camera couldn’t help turning him to gold, with every touch of light. At the climax, bleeding from an old stomach wound, Hobbs breaks his favorite bat, takes a replacement from an adoring batboy, and hits a home run with his final swing. The ball smashes into the floodlights, and Hobbs sets off on his victory trot, in slow motion, with sparks cascading behind him like fireworks. All of which is, as Roger Ebert pointed out in his review, “idolatry on behalf of Robert Redford.”

The movie works, no question, even at the peak of its absurdity. As a viewer, however, you can feel yourself being worked on, even more shamelessly than you were in “The Sting.” This worshipful attitude to Redford continued in “Out of Africa” (1985) and beyond, into the following decade; by the time of “Up Close & Personal” (1996) and “The Horse Whisperer” (1998), the gilding—literally, the illumination of his famous countenance—was sometimes difficult to watch. Hollywood’s leading performers, venturing into the dark vale of middle age, have often been kindly treated by directors of photography, if not by screenwriters. What one longed to know was what Redford, a smart and reflective soul, made of such honeyed flattery. Did he grin and bear it? Consider it his due? Accept it, with an inward sigh, as part of the deal? Or secretly despise his own connivance?

One wistful way to follow Redford’s career is to trace the paths not taken, and to set them beside the adventurous ones pursued by his contemporaries and forbears. Think of Burt Lancaster, tapped by Luchino Visconti to play the Sicilian prince in “The Leopard” (1963), and radiating, even when dubbed into Italian, a grizzled and effortless grandeur. Think of Henry Fonda—Jane’s father and, like Redford, an upright liberal—agreeing to play a murderous villain for Sergio Leone, in “Once Upon a Time in the West” (1968). Fonda arrived in Rome with his blue eyes darkened by contact lenses, the better to convey malevolence. Leone immediately told him to remove the contacts; he wanted the blueness, by way of contrast. Would Redford, whose eyes were just as sapphirelike as Fonda’s, have acceded to such a plan?

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Robert Redford Actor Film Career Hollywood Icon Legacy 罗伯特·雷德福 演员 电影生涯 好莱坞偶像 职业生涯
相关文章