Latest Business News on Fox Business 09月18日
空难家属起诉飞机制造商,指控燃油开关故障致260人遇难
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

印度航空一架波音787客机今年6月在起飞后不久发生双引擎熄火事故,导致260人遇难。事故初步报告显示,两个发动机燃油切断开关意外从“运行”切换到“关闭”状态。遇难者家属已在美国提起诉讼,指控飞机制造商波音公司和燃油开关生产商霍尼韦尔公司对此事故负责。家属援引了美国联邦航空管理局2018年的一项建议,该建议要求检查燃油开关的锁定机制,以防止意外移动。尽管该建议并非强制性,但家属认为其疏忽导致了悲剧的发生。然而,航空安全专家对此表示,开关的设计和位置不应使其容易被意外拨动。

✈️ 事故原因指控:空难遇难者家属在美国提起诉讼,将矛头指向飞机制造商波音公司和燃油开关供应商霍尼韦尔公司,指控他们对导致260人死亡的印度航空航班事故负有责任。诉讼的核心在于对飞机燃油开关故障的指控。

🔒 燃油开关故障疑云:据事故初步报告,涉事航班起飞后不久,两个发动机的燃油切断开关意外地从“运行”模式切换到了“关闭”模式,导致了双引擎熄火。家属援引了美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)在2018年发布的一份建议性航空安全信息通告,该通告曾建议检查包括波音787在内的多款机型的燃油开关锁定机制,以确保其不会被意外触动。

⚠️ 安全建议与执行:虽然FAA的2018年建议并非强制性指令,但家属认为,未能充分执行相关检查可能导致了此次悲剧。初步报告也指出,印度航空并未进行建议中的检查,并且在事故飞机上,包括燃油开关在内的油门控制模块曾于2019年和2023年被更换过。尽管如此,报告也提及所有适用的适航指令和警报服务通告均已在飞机和发动机上得到遵守。

🤔 专家观点与争议:尽管家属和初步报告指出了燃油开关可能存在的问题,但一些航空安全专家向路透社表示,根据开关的设计和所处位置,它们不应能够被意外拨动。这为事故原因的最终判定增添了不确定性。

The families of four victims who died in an Air India crash earlier this year are blaming faulty fuel switches for the incident that killed 260 people. 

In the first lawsuit filed in the U.S. over the crash, the families are accusing plane maker Boeing and Honeywell, which made the switches, of being responsible.

Air India Flight 171 took off on June 12 for London from the Indian city of Ahmedabad in a Boeing 787. Just seconds later, both engine fuel cutoff switches moved from run to cutoff, causing dual-engine flameout, according to the crash's preliminary report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). 

The plaintiffs, in a complaint filed Tuesday in Delaware Superior Court, point to a 2018 Federal Aviation Aadministration advisory that recommended, but did not mandate, operators of several Boeing models, including the 787, inspect the fuel cutoff switches' locking mechanism to ensure it could not be accidentally moved.

DOOMED AIR INDIA FLIGHT LOST ENGINE FUEL MID-FLIGHT, COCKPIT CHAOS REVEALED IN REPORT

"The FAA issued Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) No. NM-18-33 on December 17, 2018, regarding the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature," the preliminary report states. 

AAIB's preliminary report stated that Air India had not conducted the suggested inspections, and that maintenance records showed that the throttle control module, which includes the fuel switches, was replaced in 2019 and 2023 on the plane involved in the crash.

ONLY SURVIVOR OF DEADLY AIR INDIA PLANE CRASH SAYS SURVIVAL WAS A 'MIRACLE'

The report noted that "all applicable airworthiness directives and alert service bulletins were complied with on the aircraft as well as engines."

The lawsuit maintains that the switches are in a place in the cockpit where they were more likely to be inadvertently pushed, which "effectively guaranteed that normal cockpit activity could result in inadvertent fuel cutoff."

However, aviation safety experts told Reuters that they could not be accidentally flipped based on their location and design.

The AAIB's report mentioned a cockpit voice recording where one pilot asked the other why he cut off the fuel and "the other pilot responded that he did not do so."

Boeing referred FOX Business to the report, but did not provide any additional comment. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Honeywell did not immediately respond to a FOX Business inquiry. 

Reuters contributed to this report. 

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Air India 空难 波音 霍尼韦尔 燃油开关 法律诉讼 航空安全 Air India crash Boeing Honeywell fuel switches lawsuit aviation safety
相关文章