Physics World 09月17日
人工智能在数学领域的崛起与人类数学家的担忧
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

微软发布的一项研究列出了40个最可能受生成式人工智能(gen AI)影响的职业,其中“数学家”的出现令人意外。海德堡科学论坛(HLF)的与会者指出,计算机已开始承担许多以往由人类数学家完成的任务,这引发了复杂的感受。数学物理学家杨-辉·何对AI在数学上的高效表现表示惊叹,但也担忧人类的定位。理论计算机科学家 Sanjeev Arora 强调了AI不知疲倦和通过强化学习不断改进的优势,并认为AI“证明助手”将取代人类校对者。尽管AI在生成和验证数学问题及解决方案方面展现出巨大潜力,但也引发了关于变革速度和人类在这一过程中的作用的讨论。

🤖 **AI在数学领域的应用日益广泛**:研究表明,生成式人工智能(gen AI)正逐渐渗透到数学领域,承担起以往由人类数学家完成的许多任务,例如生成和验证数学问题及解决方案。这引发了数学界对AI能力和未来角色的深度思考。

🤔 **人类数学家的复杂情感**:面对AI在数学上的高效表现,人类数学家情绪复杂。一方面,他们对AI能够“在不理解数学的情况下进行数学运算”感到惊叹,另一方面,也对自身在AI时代的角色和价值感到忧虑,例如杨-辉·何提出的“我们的位置在哪里?”的疑问。

💡 **AI在数学研究中的优势**:AI在数学领域的优势体现在其不知疲倦的工作能力以及通过强化学习不断优化自身表现的能力。Sanjeev Arora 认为,AI的“证明助手”功能将能有效取代人类校对者,极大地提高数学研究的效率,甚至能快速生成人类需要数月才能完成的研究成果。

⚠️ **对变革速度和人类角色的审慎考量**:尽管AI在数学领域带来了巨大进步,但也引发了对变革速度过快以及人类是否需要或想要这些改变的担忧。Maia Fraser 强调,即使无法阻止AI的发展,人类依然有权决定自己想要何种未来,呼吁在AI发展过程中保留人类的主导权和决策权。

When researchers at Microsoft released a list of the 40 jobs most likely to be affected by generative artificial intelligence (gen AI), few outsiders would have expected to see “mathematician” among them. Yet according to speakers at this year’s Heidelberg Laureate Forum (HLF), which connects early-career researchers with distinguished figures in mathematics and computer science, computers are already taking over many tasks formerly performed by human mathematicians – and the humans have mixed feelings about it.

One of those expressing disquiet is Yang-Hui He, a mathematical physicist at the London Institute for Mathematical Sciences. In general, He is extremely keen on AI. He’s written a textbook about the use of AI in mathematics, and he told the audience at an HLF panel discussion that he’s been peddling machine-learning techniques to his mathematical physics colleagues since 2017.

More recently, though, He has developed concerns about gen AI specifically. “It is doing mathematics so well without any understanding of mathematics,” he said, a note of wonder creeping into his voice. Then, more plaintively, he added, “Where is our place?”

AI advantages

Some of the things that make today’s gen AI so good at mathematics are the same as the ones that made Google’s DeepMind so good at the game of Go. As the theoretical computer scientist Sanjeev Arora pointed out in his HLF talk, “The reason it’s better than humans is that it’s basically tireless.” Put another way, if the 20th-century mathematician Alfréd Rényi once described his colleagues as “machines for turning coffee into theorems”, one advantage of 21st-century AI is that it does away with the coffee.

Arora, however, sees even greater benefits. In his view, AI’s ability to use feedback to improve its own performance – a technique known as reinforcement learning – is particularly well-suited to mathematics.

In the standard version of reinforcement learning, Arora explains, the AI model is given a large bank of questions, asked to generate many solutions and told to use the most correct ones (as labelled by humans) to refine its model. But because mathematics is so formalized, with answers that are so verifiably true or false, Arora thinks it will soon be possible to replace human correctness checkers with AI “proof assistants”. Indeed, he’s developing one such assistant himself, called Lean, with his colleagues at Princeton University in the US.

Humans in the loop?

But why stop there? Why not use AI to generate mathematical questions as well as producing and checking their solutions? Indeed, why not get it to write a paper, peer review it and publish it for its fellow AI mathematicians – which are, presumably, busy combing the literature for information to help them define new questions?

Arora clearly thinks that’s where things are heading, and many of his colleagues seem to agree, at least in part. His fellow HLF panellist Javier Gómez-Serrano, a mathematician at Brown University in the US, noted that AI is already generating results in a day or two that would previously have taken a human mathematician months. “Progress has been quite quick,” he said.

The panel’s final member, Maia Fraser of the University of Ottawa, Canada, likewise paid tribute to the “incredible things that are possible with AI now”.  But Fraser, who works on mathematical problems related to neuroscience, also sounded a note of caution. “My concern is the speed of the changes,” she told the HLF audience.

The risk, Fraser continued, is that some of these changes may end up happening by default, without first considering whether humans want or need them. While we can’t un-invent AI, “we do have agency” over what we want, she said.

So, do we want a world in which AI mathematicians take humans “out of the loop” entirely? For He, the benefits may outweigh the disadvantages. “I really want to see a proof of the Riemann hypothesis,” he said,  to ripples of laughter. If that means that human mathematicians “become priests to oracles”, He added, so be it.

The post Are we heading for a future of superintelligent AI mathematicians? appeared first on Physics World.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

人工智能 数学 生成式AI AI伦理 AI与科学 Artificial Intelligence Mathematics Generative AI AI Ethics AI and Science
相关文章