The Verge - Artificial Intelligences 09月15日
媒体公司起诉谷歌AI摘要
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

美国媒体公司Penske Media Corporation成为首个起诉谷歌AI摘要的公司,指控其AI Overviews摘要损害了用户点击源网站的意愿,非法获利。此前Chegg和欧洲独立出版商也已起诉。谷歌称AI摘要提升了搜索帮助,但Penske等公司指出流量和收入显著下降,其今年联盟链接收入下降超过1/3。Penske面临两难:阻止谷歌索引内容将摧毁业务,继续提供训练材料则助长威胁其业务的AI。

📌 Penske Media Corporation成为首个起诉谷歌AI Overviews摘要的美国媒体公司,指控其损害用户点击源网站的意愿,非法获利。

🔍 谷歌称AI摘要提升了搜索帮助,但Penske等公司指出流量和收入显著下降,其今年联盟链接收入下降超过1/3。

🤔 Penske面临两难选择:阻止谷歌索引内容将摧毁其业务,继续提供训练材料则助长威胁其业务的AI。

📉 其他公司如Chegg、欧洲独立出版商、Encyclopedia Britannica、Merriam-Webster、News Corp、微软和OpenAI也因类似问题与AI公司对簿公堂。

🌐 谷歌可能因承认“开放网络已快速衰落”并面临多项反垄断投诉,在辩护中面临更严峻的挑战。

Disclosure: Penske Media Corporation is an investor in Vox Media, The Verge’s parent company.

Penske Media Corporation, the publisher of Rolling Stone and The Hollywood Reporter, has become the first major American media company to sue Google over its AI summaries. The company claims that the AI Overviews that often appear at the top of search results leave users with little reason to click through to the source, hurting traffic and illegally benefitting from the work of its reporters. 

While Penske Media is the biggest name to take on Google over its AI Overviews, it’s not the first. Online education company Chegg sued Google in February, as did a group of independent publishers in Europe. The News / Media Alliance has also spoken out about the feature, calling it the “definition of theft” and seeking action from the DOJ. 

Google spokesperson José Castañeda defended the summaries to the Wall Street Journal saying, “with AI Overviews, people find search more helpful and use it more.” But Penske and other publishers say there is little reason to follow the links provided in search results and, as a result, they have seen significant drops in traffic and revenue. Penske claims in the suit that revenue from affiliate links is down by over 1/3 this year, and it attributes that directly to a drop in traffic from Google.

The company also claims it’s in a tough situation. It can either block Google from indexing its content, essentially removing itself from all search results, which would further devastate its business. Or, it can continue to provide training material to Google for its AI, “adding fuel to a fire that threatens PMC’s [Penske Media Corporation] entire publishing business,” the complaint states, according to the Wall Street Journal.

This is, of course, just the latest battle between AI companies and the creators of the content they harvest. Encyclopedia Britannica and Merriam-Webster recently sued Perplexity, as did News Corp last year. Meanwhile Microsoft and OpenAI have found themselves in the crosshairs of the New York Times, the New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and others. Google might also have a tougher time defending itself now that it’s been forced to admit that “the open web is already in rapid decline,” as it faces multiple antitrust complaints.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

媒体公司 谷歌 AI摘要 法律诉讼 网络流量 反垄断
相关文章