Astral Codex Ten 09月12日
论“天选之人”与政治人物的特质
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨了美国政治中一种独特的现象:候选人似乎并非因其积极品质而胜出,而是通过某种“神圣拣选”的叙事脱颖而出。作者以唐纳德·特朗普为例,指出他能在各种丑闻中幸存,并获得跨越党派和意识形态的支持,这被比作圣经中上帝拣选不称职但被赋予权力的君王。文章认为,公众对政治人物的印象与他们的胜选几率可能呈负相关,并以此引申出加州州长加文·纽森也具备这种“天选”的特质,尽管作者对其执政表现持保留态度。最终,文章提出在当前政治环境下,理解这种非理性但有效的吸引力,并顺应趋势,而非试图推崇理性化的选择,或许是更务实的策略。

🌟 **“神圣拣选”叙事的影响力**:文章核心观点认为,政治人物的成功并非总是基于其正面素质,而是常常依赖一种“被上帝拣选”的叙事。这种叙事赋予候选人一种不可战胜的形象,使其能够超越常规的政治逻辑,获得看似不可能的支持群体,例如特朗普能够同时获得福音派和拥枪者的支持,这被作者解读为一种“神圣拣选”的体现,类似于圣经中上帝拣选的君王。

💪 **外在特质与“王者之相”**:文章强调,在现代政治中,候选人的外在形象和“王者之相”至关重要。作者引用了“Mencius Moldbug”和“Richard Hanania”的观点,认为高大、有魄力的外表(如特朗普的身高、发型、标志性表情)以及表现出的“主权权威”能够本能地吸引选民。这种“生物力学”上的优势,甚至比候选人的政策主张或智力更能影响选民的投票倾向。

⚖️ **对现有政治选择的审视**:作者对传统意义上理性选择政治人物的方式提出了质疑,认为像支持安德鲁·杨或约翰·卡西奇这类具有积极品质的候选人,其投票倾向反而与胜选几率呈负相关。因此,作者建议与其推崇“布蒂吉格/罗姆尼2028”,不如去寻找那些具备“神圣拣选”特质的候选人,并认为加文·纽森具备这种特质,尽管作者对其执政能力持保留态度,但认为他能适应国家舞台。

🚀 **预测与策略调整**:文章基于对“神圣拣选”理论的理解,预测加文·纽森将在2028年击败JD·万斯。作者认为,JD·万斯身上体现了“希腊悲剧”的叙事,即一个有潜力但最终失败的人物,而纽森则是一个“生来就被注定”要获胜的形象,因为他缺乏可以被背叛的“积极品质”。这种预测也暗示了一种策略上的转变:顺应现有政治潮流,而非试图改变它。

The case for Gavin Newsom is simple. The Republicans nominated someone with no positive qualities, and they won bigly. Now it is our turn to nominate someone with no positive qualities.

Positive qualities, the case goes, are overrated. They can get you a billion dollars, or a Nobel, or some other consolation prize. To become President, you must be chosen by God.

Donald Trump was chosen by God. You can tell because he's invincible. He can wriggle out of scandals that would sink Tricky Dick Nixon ten times over. He can run on a platform of punishing illegal immigrants, and the illegal immigrants themselves will rally to his banner. He can support Israel harder than anyone has ever supported it before, and Arab-Americans will break fifty years of Voting Blue No Matter Who to march behind him. He can get 100% evangelical backing while oozing contempt for Christianity, 100% libertarian support while trampling the Constitution, and 100% allegiance from Wall Street while dismantling global trade. KKK wizards and celebrity rappers compete to compliment him loudest; Nazis and the ADL jostle past each other to sing his praises. Shooting him in the head only makes him stronger.

To posit Trump's divine election is not to imply he has any positive qualities. When the Israelites stopped obeying the commandments, God punished them by raising an incompetent idolator named Jeroboam to the throne. Jeroboam started a disastrous war that killed 500,000 of his own men, after which his dynasty collapsed and his entire family was slain. Jeroboam was chosen by God to crush and humiliate Israel. But he was chosen by God. Has America been obeying the commandments lately?

The Bible describes the specific way that divine election works. In 1 Samuel 8, the Israelites noticed that all the cool countries had kings, and asked the prophet Samuel to choose a king for them too. Samuel picked:

…Saul, a handsome young man. There was not a man among the people of Israel more handsome than he. From his shoulders upward he was taller than any of the people.

This is how the prophets of our own time chose Trump too. In 2011, Mencius Moldbug mooted Donald Trump as a potential King of America, saying:

What do you think Americans respond to in “The Donald” and Gov. Christie? To the obvious kinginess of these figures. Supreme personal authority, generally male, is a normal human function and one we recognize instinctively. The job of King does not exist, at least not in the public sector, but the Trumps and Christies come as close to it as possible and are clearly biologically suited for the position.

And Richard Hanania, who predicted Trump’s second term, said his victory would be due to “the biomechanics”. Quoting and splicing liberally:

Republicans deal in the currency of dominance. Conservative politics has been for decades shaped by larger-than-life alpha male personalities . . . If what Trump does can be learned, and pick-up artists tell you it can, it takes years of concentrated effort. Other important differences, like the fact that Trump is simply taller than DeSantis, aren’t even fixable in theory.

Trump is tall (6 foot 3 inches). He has impressive hair, or an impressive toupee, or whatever it is that he has. His favorite facial expression is this one, but he can also do this one when appropriate, and even this one. He has never apologized for anything in his life (or, if he has, he will lie about it to your face and sue you if you mention it, which works out the same way). He is obviously fighty, not in a frantic try-hard Ron DeSantis way, but in a weird Daoist sense where he is an immovable mountain that occasionally emits avalanches that bury everyone else.

You and I are not impressed by any of this. But you and I supported Andrew Yang, or John Kasich, or Martin O’Malley, or some other person who never made it past the primaries. Your and my impression of a presidential candidate is actively anti-correlated with their chances of winning. So if you and I were smart, we would stop pushing Buttigieg / Romney ‘28 and start trying to find a person who is chosen by God, ie very tall.

Gavin Newsom is - oh, that’s interesting - 6 foot 3 inches. His favorite facial expressions are this one and this one, but he also managed to pull off this one without losing all support and having his campaign instantly collapse. He has the most dignified salt-and-pepper hair, and the whitest teeth, of all 40 million people in America’s most populous state. His family photos look like this:

And his magazine profiles look like . . . oh, that’s also interesting:

His Twitter account looks like this:

. . . and demonstrates exactly the same level of comedic genius as the man who coined classics like “Sleepy Joe Biden”. This is truly someone who can meet the American public at their own level.

I take no pleasure in reporting that Gavin Newsom was chosen by God. I think he has been a mediocre California governor. There are highlights: he’s been excellent on YIMBY issues, hasn’t interfered with the positive changes happening in San Francisco, and (always a good sign when you have to mention this one) most of the state’s problems pre-date his term. On the other hand, he has done little to solve most of them beyond stunts highlighting how progressive he is, and he’s been comically corrupt (which I think is better than being non-comically corrupt; Trump survives his many scandals because on the whole they’re pretty funny).

Still, when someone is chosen by God, what can you do? Surely it’s a waste of time to hand out Buttigieg / Romney ‘28 yard signs in such a situation; far better to get with the program. Trump is hardly an intellectual, but various people with strong beliefs - Peter Navarro, RFK Jr, Stephen Miller, Curtis Yarvin - hitched themselves to his star and got a chance to change the world. Gavin Newsom, who interviewed Ezra Klein on his podcast and whose one really outstanding issue in California has been YIMBYism, presents a similar opportunity for abundance Democrats. My main priority for 2028 is to avoid giving the GOP a chance to consolidate what they’re trying to do to the country. As for my second priority - not returning to the crazier forms of leftism - I can only trust that the same venality that made Newsom hyper-progressive in hyper-progressive California will make him somewhat more moderate on the somewhat-more-moderate national stage.

I believe Gavin Newsom will beat JD Vance. JD Vance is 6 foot 2 inches. His favorite facial expression, I am told, is this one, but this one and this one also need to be taken into consideration. His family photos are perhaps not a perfect match for the direction of the modern conservative movement. His hair is merely average. He has a normal number of teeth.

But even more than that, I have a sort of pre-intellectual, maybe even pre-verbal intuition that the genre conventions don’t permit a Vance victory. JD Vance seems to have, at some point, had positive qualities. He was intelligent. He rose from humble birth. He had a certain level of sympathy for others who started in the same place, and a certain level of curiosity about their problems. He has since betrayed all of those good qualities faster than anyone has ever betrayed anything before, backstabbed them then murdered them then pissed on their bodies then placed the urine-stained corpses in the stocks as an object of general ridicule. Every night he prays to Satan that he has humiliated himself and his values enough for their contract to still be on. But it will not be enough. JD Vance's genre is Greek tragedy - the potentially superior man who gives up everything for victory, then, at the end, has victory yanked away. He has to lose. Gavin Newsom, a man who never had any positive qualities to begin with, has been destined from birth to beat him.

The rest of us are bit players in this drama. The best we can do is try to make the best of it: raise high the Bear Flag and jockey for praetorships and quaestorships in the great Californian Empire that is to come. I am no longer Ridin’ With Biden. Now I’m Gruesome For Newsom.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

美国政治 唐纳德·特朗普 加文·纽森 政治叙事 选举 神圣拣选 政治心理学 US Politics Donald Trump Gavin Newsom Political Narrative Elections Divine Election Political Psychology
相关文章