UX Planet - Medium 09月12日
Cred 界面改版:从美学到实用性的转变
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文深入分析了支付应用 CRED 近期的界面改版。作者以一位三年老用户的视角,分享了初次体验改版后白色主题界面的困惑与观察。文章探讨了 CRED 借鉴 Gpay、Phonepe 等主流 UPI 应用设计模式的原因,包括提升用户日常操作效率、降低认知负荷以及优化用户体验。通过对比 Phonepe 改版后的数据增长,以及引用雅各布定律(用户偏好熟悉的操作模式),文章阐释了 CRED 此次改版旨在扩大用户群体,从信用卡支付转向更广泛的金融服务,并强调了数据驱动迭代和品牌定位的战略转变,从“高端”转向“实用高效”。

💡 新界面借鉴主流 UPI 应用,旨在提升操作效率和用户熟悉度。CRED 此次改版采用了白色主题,并将交易记录、联系客服、推荐好友等常用功能直接置于首页,同时在底部导航栏新增“Rewards”和“More”标签,以简化用户日常操作流程,降低认知负荷,提升使用效率,满足用户对快速便捷支付的需求。

📈 改版背后的市场考量:为扩大用户群体,CRED正从专注于信用卡支付转向更广泛的金融服务,如账单支付、EMI、甚至保险等,朝着“超级应用”发展。面对 Gpay、Phonepe 等竞争对手的市场份额优势,以及用户对简单易用工具的偏好,CRED 需通过熟悉的操作模式吸引更广泛用户。

📊 数据驱动与品牌定位转变:此次改版很可能是基于大量用户数据分析的结果,旨在优化关键绩效指标(KPIs)。从品牌定位上看,CRED 正从过去的“装饰性高端”转向“运营卓越”,强调清晰、简洁、高效的体验,以赢得用户信任,尤其是在二三线城市用户中,他们更看重实用性和熟悉度。

📐 遵循“渐进式披露”原则,保持首页简洁。CRED 采用“不要让首页拥挤,通过分层来成长”的策略,将核心功能(如扫码、支付、账单、充值)放在首页,而将不常用或高级功能隐藏在菜单中,确保应用在功能扩展的同时,主界面依然保持稳定和易于使用,满足不同层级用户的需求。

Didn’t see this coming: CRED leans on familiar UPI patterns and progressive disclosure. The result is clearer paths and faster first actions.

Three days back I went to a local grocery store and added few things into the cart and then I opened my mobile to do the UPI payment through cred. Then bam! I saw a white theme homepage as Cred’s home. This is the first time I’m seeing it in 3 years of cred user(believe me I’m loyal to Cred! Hehe). I was confused when did it update? How did they end up with white theme and where did my scan QR code option go, etc. And the biggest shock was why did they do the homepage content similar to Gpay, Phonepe and other UPI apps.

Well I’m writing this article to explain the redesign based on my experience and assumptions with market research. The article is gonna be long! but it’s gonna be interesting…

What are the changes Cred do?

What’s new:

Navigation Updates:

Why this helps:

What can be the reason’s to Redesign?

Let’s understand the market!

To see the growth we often compare any startup with it’s competitors and here Cred’s competition is with Gpay, Phonepe, Paytm majorly. In the starting cred used to fill for complete different segment that was for Credit card users mostly from 18–40 age tech savvy people. But after taking some interest in UPI, they started acquiring new customers.

What happened in the last few months?

This likely isn’t the only reason for CRED’s update, but daily users increasingly prefer simple, fast tools. We use GPay/PhonePe because they’re easy, animations are nice, but repeating the same action 10 times a day makes long animations tiring. In late April, PhonePe launched PhonePe 3.0, which improved the app by clearly separating features. People praised the design and, yes, the ROI angle often gets ignored — but the result is strong.

Estimated ROI of Phonepe Redesign:

*This data is not official from Phonepe, it is estimated data through various sources.

It can be FOMO!

People tend to move toward what’s easy to use. Animations are nice, but not every day. If something loads faster, let me scan and pay — then yes, I’ll use that app.

CRED’s design has been strongly user‑centric, focused mainly on the 18–35 age group, and it shows in how it’s used today. The goal now is wider adoption. It’s not only about credit card payments anymore. New services cover money management and EMIs, plus some vehicle‑insurance tasks. It’s edging toward a super‑app: recharges, spotting where extra money went via hidden charges, and more. CRED’s market share is low compared to other apps — see the image for reference.

Here comes the Jacob Law into the action, it says that “Users spend most of their time on other sites. This means that users prefer your site to work the same way as all the other sites they already know.

It becomes easier to attract users when the app feels similar to other UPI apps and doesn’t intimidate people from using it quickly.

The simple formula: if CRED wants more users, keep it usable and familiar. Other apps are growing fast, so CRED may be feeling the FOMO — trying to compete in the same lane while still looking cool.

What are the other reasons/assumptions for Cred home redesign?

Data-driven Iteration

CRED may have analyzed a large volume of usage data and seen better results while testing the new design. In the end, it’s about how easily and quickly a user can complete a task. If usability improves and users are understood better, retention rises. To measure these KPIs, teams can use frameworks like task success rate, time on task, user error rate, bounce rate, and many others. If you want a deeper list, search for “KPIs to evaluate design success”.

Shifting the Brand Position

This reads as a move from ornamental “premium” to operational excellence. In India’s payments market — especially Tier‑2/3 — users arrive with strong intent and mental models formed by dominant UPI apps. Mirroring familiar flows (Scan & Pay, Send Money, Recharges, Bills) respects learned behavior, lowers cognitive load, and shortens time‑to‑action. A utility‑first home increases first‑click success, reduces funnel confusion, and scales cleanly as the surface grows (credit tools, card management, wallet). It also travels better on mid‑tier hardware and spotty networks, improving perceived performance, trust, and accessibility — factors tied to activation, repeat use, and lower support.

Strategically, simplification protects equity and anchors it to reliability and speed. Premium is no longer dense visuals or heavy editorial; it’s clarity, restrained motion, and tight feedback that help people finish money tasks with confidence. Standardized IA and components raise delivery velocity and shrink UX debt, so differentiation goes where it matters: smarter reminders, sharper rewards curation, deeper credit insights, and quiet automation. Net effect: a simpler‑looking home that does more — turning occasional visits into daily utility by matching how people already pay and by making core jobs obvious the moment the app opens.

Cred is following “Don’t cram the home — grow with layers” — which is pretty good decision

The app already has a lot of features and will add more, so the screen can’t turn into a billboard. Keep the home as a clear hub with just the key actions up front (Scan, Pay/Send, Bills, Recharge). Show advanced options only when requested — classic progressive disclosure. Reveal what’s needed now, let people drill down step by step.

This scales well: the main screen stays stable and easy even as the product expands. New or occasional users get speed and clarity. Power users get depth through menus, detail pages, and expandable sections. Net result: less overwhelm, faster actions, and a design that keeps growing without turning into home‑page sprawl.

What do you think about this Redesign?

Let’s exchange the opinions in the comments 😁

🎉Kudos to you for sticking around till the very end!

Connect with me on LinkedIn and let’s keep the design conversation going. Can’t get enough? Neither can I! Stay tuned for more design hacks and quirks. Happy designing, and remember: life’s too short for boring interfaces!


CRED’s Bold Redesign: From Aesthetic to Action was originally published in UX Planet on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

CRED 界面设计 用户体验 UPI 金融科技 产品改版 UI/UX App Redesign Fintech User Experience Payment Apps
相关文章