少点错误 09月10日
口罩要求与舞会出席率关系再分析
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

对BIDA舞会口罩要求与出席率关系的数据进行了再分析。结果显示,其他因素解释了大部分出席率变化,口罩要求仅贡献了5%的变异,相关系数为0.21,未达到统计学显著水平。尽管表面趋势显示口罩要求有影响,但样本量(44场舞会)不足以证明这种影响。若要确认口罩要求的影响,可能需要超过80场舞会的样本量。

📊 数据分析表明,舞会出席率的大部分变异由其他因素解释,口罩要求仅贡献了5%的变异,相关系数为0.21,未达到统计学显著水平。

🤔 尽管表面趋势显示口罩要求对出席率有影响,但样本量(44场舞会)不足以证明这种影响,可能需要超过80场舞会的样本量才能确认这种影响。

🔍 分析采用了置换检验方法,通过模拟随机排列数据标签来评估口罩要求的影响,结果显示19.3%的模拟通过了测试,p值为0.193。

📈 虽然舞会出席率在口罩可选的舞会上可能更高,但其他来源的变异足够大,导致在23场舞会的情况下,这种表面差异仍有可能是偶然发生的。

Published on September 10, 2025 2:40 AM GMT

Entropic Thoughts recently reanalyzedthe data I'd shared on the relationshipbetween mask requirements and dance attendance we've seen atBIDA. They conclude:

Other sources account for most of the variation in dance attendance,and masking only plays a small part. The amount of the total variationcontributed by masking requirements is 5 %. This number is called thecoefficient of determination, and its square root is the correlation:0.21. This correlation is low enough that we cannot conclude thatmasking has a significant effect on attendance.
...
"But it still looks like masking has an effect!!" It does. It's justthat if the effect is there, it is small enough that we cannotstatistically prove an effect with just 44 dances. Assuming thecoefficient of determination really is 5 %, and we are aiming for atraditional significance level of 0.05, the sample size curves tell uswe would need over 80 dances to be sure of the effect of masking.

The approach they took in their post involves some statistics thatmake assumptions about the distribution of the data. While theseassumptions may well be right, now that we have fast computers we canoften use simulations to avoid this. I decided to have a go atanalyzing this data with a permutationtest.

In this approach, you permute (shuffle) the labels and thencheck what fraction of permutations led to an outcome at least asextreme as observed. In this case the attendance numbers were:

I decided to operationalize "at least this extreme" as the ratio ofthe average attendance at mask required to mask optional dances andwrote some code to simulate. With 10Msimulations, which coded in very lazy python run for 27s on my Mac, Ifound that 19.3% of simulations passed that test, which can beexpressed as p=0.193.

The bottom line is the same, however: while the pattern we saw is morelikely in worlds where mask-optional dances are more popular, there'senough variation from other sources that with 23 dances there's stilla decent chance that this apparent difference isn't real.

Comment via: facebook, mastodon, bluesky



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

口罩要求 舞会出席率 数据分析 统计学 置换检验 BIDA
相关文章