Mashable 09月06日
《The Traitors》:欺骗与悬疑的现实电视魅力
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

《The Traitors》是一档以苏格兰城堡为背景的竞争性真人秀节目,围绕欺骗和猜疑展开。节目将参赛者分为“忠诚者”和“背叛者”,背叛者暗中“谋杀”忠诚者,而忠诚者则试图找出并驱逐背叛者。节目因其对操纵和欺骗的描绘,以及由此产生的戏剧性冲突,吸引了众多观众,尤其是那些欣赏其“反派”角色的观众。节目中,虚伪与真实界限模糊,参赛者利用表演和伪装来赢得比赛,这与作者成长经历中对“酷儿”身份的体验产生了共鸣,也反映了当代真人秀节目中真实与表演的界限日益模糊的趋势。新一季将回归素人选手,有望增加节目的不可预测性和真实感。

🎭 **《The Traitors》的独特魅力在于其对欺骗与悬疑的极致展现。** 节目将一群精心挑选的参赛者置于一个古老的苏格兰城堡中,并秘密分配“忠诚者”和“背叛者”两个身份。背叛者们必须暗中进行“谋杀”,而忠诚者则需要通过观察、推理和投票来找出隐藏在他们中间的背叛者。这种高强度的心理博弈和策略对抗,使得每一集都充满了紧张感和不可预测性,让观众仿佛置身于一场大型的真人版“狼人杀”游戏之中。

🏳️‍🌈 **节目中的“酷儿”共鸣与身份认同的探索。** 作者认为,《The Traitors》所营造的秘密、伪装和“开关”(code-switching)的氛围,与许多酷儿观众的成长经历不谋而合。在成长过程中,为了隐藏真实自我而扮演不同角色的经历,使得这类节目中的策略性欺骗和身份扮演变得格外有吸引力。这种“扮演反派”的幻想,提供了一个安全空间,让观众可以探索和释放那些在现实生活中可能被压抑的欲望和特质。

🌟 **真人秀节目中“真实”与“表演”界限的模糊化。** 随着真人秀节目的发展,尤其是明星真人秀的普及,节目的“真实性”逐渐被表演和商品化所取代。参赛者不再仅仅是“做自己”,而是更倾向于扮演一个能够吸引观众、制造话题的角色,以迎合节目对“看点”的需求。然而,节目回归素人选手,被视为一种对更深层次“真实感”的追求,有望带来更具不可预测性和个人魅力的竞争。

✨ **素人选手回归的可能性与节目未来的发展。** NBC宣布将在美国版《The Traitors》中重新引入素人选手,这被认为将为节目注入新的活力和不可预测性。与有固定人设的明星选手不同,素人选手更可能带来意想不到的策略和真实反应,让观众有机会看到普通人在高压环境下如何运用智慧和伪装来争取胜利。这不仅增加了节目的吸引力,也可能重新定义观众对真人秀“真实”的认知。

I remember being glued to the first, game-changing season of Survivor in 2000. Since then, I’ve fallen for everything from the raw talent on So You Think You Can Dance to the glitzy drama of The Real Housewives of New York City (my East Coast roots showing). But now? Watching cloaked figures lie and manipulate each other for $250,000 in a Scottish castle is the kind of reality TV chaos that really speaks to me. 

Nothing has grabbed my attention lately like the U.S. version of The Traitors, a competition show centered entirely around deception and suspicion. In my view, The Traitors is ultimately a result of reality TV evolving into a genre where villains aren’t just tolerated — they’re often rewarded and celebrated for their dishonesty.

Each episode also permeates with a distinctly queer sensibility, and it’s not because of its players or its fabulous host, Alan Cumming (we’ll get to him later). It’s the secrecy and code-switching set against a glamorous backdrop that resonates with many queer viewers — me especially. 

As a queer person growing up, I felt the need to be two steps ahead of others' suspicions, a skill I believe would serve well as a Traitor. My history of pretending to be straight and drawing inspiration from manipulative TV characters has prepared me to anticipate every scenario, from roundtable banishments to breakfast revelations, to keep me two steps ahead of the Faithfuls. 

The Traitors gives me space to embrace the villain, to imagine slipping into that black cloak and playing the game as someone no one sees coming. 

That fantasy is harder to buy into when everyone on screen already has a brand. Which is why NBC’s recent announcement that civilians will be making a comeback for the U.S. edition instantly makes the game less predictable and a lot more interesting. Especially for those of us still waiting to see ourselves at that roundtable.

If Agatha Christie wrote a drag version of Clue, it would be The Traitors 

For the uninitiated, the premise of the Peacock show is this: Put two dozen competitors in a Scottish castle, assign them one of two roles (Faithful or Traitor), and watch what happens. I see it as an epically scaled version of the game Mafia, where players attempt to root out saboteurs while competing in challenges along the way, before voting to banish who they think is a Traitor.

The murder-mystery theme of the show will pique the interest of any fan of the genre, particularly someone like me who is a fanatic of the movie Clue and was raised by a mother who worshipped at the altar of Agatha Christie. I was immediately drawn to The Traitors in early 2023 when the first season dropped with a cast featuring a mix of civilians and reality TV stars. It was fascinating to see the dynamic play out between everyday people (Andie Vanacore, we say your name) competing alongside reality TV stars, including celebrated alums from Survivor (hi, Cirie!) and Real Housewives franchises (Brandi Glanville).

As Mashable's Shannon Connellan has outlined before, Cumming as the show's chic but cryptic host is reason enough to binge-watch the available seasons as we wait for the show to return. He’s a pitch-perfect facilitator, delivering delicious one-liners with the right amount of sass, styled in scene-stealing outfits.

However, that’s not entirely why this cutthroat competition has me hooked.

Come for the camp, stay for the sabotage 

Having watched three seasons of the US version and two of the UK version, I’ve concluded that the show is designed for Traitors. With no real clues to find early in the mystery game, there’s no reason to suspect anyone. All a player has to do is voice some doubts, and from there, we get to watch how quickly people become influenced and how herd mentality sets in. 

Watching them sneak around in their hooded cloaks in the castle’s turret every night is fun, but what hooks me is how easily I find myself rooting for the manipulators and how comfortably I imagine tapping into my inner Traitor. 

There’s an inherent thrill to being a villain; just look at how many contestants arrive ready to dig into their murderous roles. There’s something intoxicating about practicing the art of deception, without a care for who you backstab in order to be a winner. It’s kind of alluring.

Soapy queens and scheming dreams

My urge to star as a villain on The Traitors stems from watching one too many primetime soap reruns in my youth and being enthralled by the secretive and conniving vixens I admired on those shows. Knots Landing’s scheming Abby Cunningham (Donna Mills) could intimidate a lion with her wicked smile, while on Melrose Place, Marcia Cross’s Kimberly Shaw plotted against her enemies with relish

Then again, maybe I was attracted to the campiness with which these women executed their devious plans. As a gay man, I tend to respond favorably to camp, a style known for its ostentatious and theatrical qualities. Performative deception comes with the queer territory for me. Hiding my true self for years forced me to play a certain role and trick others into believing I was someone I wasn’t. And developing a sense for camp (knowing when to be “on” or “off”) may have trained me in keeping others further off my scent.

Buying the lie over and over again

The Traitors also resonates with me because it reiterates a lie reality TV has gradually fed me for years: Authenticity is everything. The American show clearly favors panache and polish over anything resembling realness. It relies less on people “being themselves” and more on established names and personalities to deliver a good episode.

Seventeen years ago, when I first entered the Real Housewives universe, I bought into those women living in luxurious leisure. But the more popular these shows became, the more famous these women became — and the more they seemed to become lucrative commodities. And because they were commodities, the more they – and perhaps the franchise – had to flaunt their wealth via shopping sprees, extravagant vacations, or catered events celebrating a pet’s birthday. That’s when I realized the authenticity felt performative. To me, it screamed, “Aspire to have this lifestyle!”

We’re living in an era in which the reality TV genre has evolved to the point where the line between performance and reality is at its blurriest. This has birthed a new type of “real people” who know how to work the camera, and the camera seems to keep focusing on them.

Now that NBC plans to bring civilian players back into the mix, I think it would make the game feel more grounded. I enjoy seeing regular people compete to win, not perform. There’s more of an authenticity factor at play with them, and I find that kind of endearing. Veteran reality TV players built their reputations on screen; viewers who know them are biased, expecting these personalities to clash with each other.

During her exit interviews, Big Brother’s Britney Haynes, who was the last Traitor standing in Season 3, reflected on how much players, especially reality TV vets, are always thinking about what makes for good TV. I have to ask then: Will future civilian players in the American production have the same know-how? What will casting directors be looking for this time? If we’ve become a nation of viewers that favors performative reality over watching actual, real people, could that dictate their selections?

Hiding in plain realness

As for the upcoming Season 4, it still leans heavily on familiar faces, but I can see how adding actor-comedians like Ron Funches and Michael Rapaport could inject some unpredictability into the mix of contestants. Even casting Monét X Change as the show’s next resident drag queen – following in the footsteps of past contestants Bob the Drag Queen and Peppermint – could ensure some complementary camp next to Cumming. 

As Ira Madison III, former co-host of the podcast Keep It, shared earlier this year, “when you cast good people who aren’t seasoned reality TV people, they will deliver a good season.” I agree. I’m sure there are plenty of everyday Americans who have perfected the art of hiding their identity and could use The Traitors as a playground to demonstrate those skills, tapping into their inner villains by strategizing and deceiving their way to $250,000.

That's who I’d root for. 

The Traitors and all of its foreign counterparts are currently streaming on Peacock.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

The Traitors 真人秀 欺骗 悬疑 现实电视 身份认同 酷儿 The Traitors Reality TV Deception Suspense Queer Identity
相关文章