钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知 09月03日
特朗普就全球关税裁决诉诸最高法院
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

美国总统特朗普因其使用紧急权力实施全球关税的裁决,正计划向最高法院提起上诉,并寻求“加速裁决”。他认为此举事关国家经济安全,若关税被取消,可能导致美国沦为“第三世界国家”。此前,美国联邦上诉法院裁定特朗普总统权力使用不当,认为《国际紧急经济权力法》并未授权其征收此类关税。尽管法院的裁决对特朗普的贸易政策构成打击,但关税目前仍有效,直到法律程序结束。特朗普在社交媒体上表示,他相信美国最终会在最高法院获胜,并强调关税对国家经济的重要性。同时,美国财政部长也表示,正在制定备选方案以应对可能的不利裁决。

🇺🇸 特朗普总统就其使用紧急权力实施全球关税的合法性,计划向美国最高法院提起上诉,并寻求加速裁决。他认为此举是应对“经济紧急状态”的必要措施,并警告若关税被取消,可能对美国经济造成严重负面影响,甚至将其降级为“第三世界国家”。

⚖️ 美国联邦上诉法院此前裁定,特朗普总统通过行政命令实施的全球关税违反了《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA),该法律并未赋予总统如此广泛的征税权力。法院维持了下级法院的裁决,认为总统无权仅凭“监管”进口的权力来征收此类关税。

📈 尽管上诉法院的裁决对特朗普的贸易政策核心构成重大打击,但裁决的生效日期被推迟到10月14日,为特朗普政府争取了向最高法院上诉的时间。在此期间,已实施的关税仍然有效。特朗普在社交媒体上对此回应,强调关税依然有效,并对最终获胜表示乐观。

🛡️ 面对可能的法律挑战,美国政府高官正在制定“B计划”。美国财政部长表示,虽然对最高法院支持总统使用IEEPA 征收关税的权力有信心,但也在考虑其他法律依据,例如《1930年斯姆特-霍利关税法》第338条,以备不时之需。

TMTPOST -- U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday highlighted his determination to overturn an appeals court’s ruling that his use of emergency powers to impose worldwide tariffs is unlawful.


Credit:U.S. Supreme Court

Trump said his administration would appeal to the Supreme Court on Wednesday and seek for an “expedited ruling”. "It's an economic emergency," he said on a CNN radio show. "If we don’t win that decision, you’ll see a reverberation like maybe you’ve never seen before," he added. 

“We’re going to be going to the Supreme Court, we think tomorrow, because we need an early decision,” Trump said in the Oval Office, arguing that the “financial fabric of our country” is at stake.  “If you take away tariffs, we could end up being a third-world country,” Trump later Tuesday threatened

Trump claimed the U.S. stock market “needs the tariffs, they want the tariffs”, as the market indices dropped on Tuesday due to a federal appeals court’s ruling announced Friday.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. found Trump overstepped his presidential powers with his global tariffs. The court said in a filling that it agreed that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA)’s grant of presidential authority to “regulate” imports does not authorize the tariffs imposed by his five executive orders.

The Trump administration had argued that a president can unilaterally impose wide-ranging, global tariffs by invoking IEEPA to protect the U.S. from international threats. Enacted in 1977, IEEPA authorizes the president to “regulate” international commerce after declaring a national emergency. But the Federal Circuit on Friday upheld a lower-court ruling against Trump’s tariff.

The ruling shot down most of tariffs that the Trump administration has implemented so far this year, including reciprocal tariffs on all the trading partners and trafficking tariffs hitting Canada, Mexico and China. “We dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the Court of International Trade (CIT)’s summary judgment that the reciprocal and trafficking tariffs are unlawful,” the appeals court in its opinion released on Friday concluded.

While the latest decision of the appeals court stroke a big blow to the core of Trump’s trade policy, the tariffs remain in place as the case continues to be adjudicated in the CIT. The appeals court said its ruling would not come into effect until October 14, effectively giving the Trump administration a chance and time to file an appeal with the Supreme Court. 

Trump on Friday responded the ruling on his social media Truth Social: “ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT!”  “Today a Highly Partisan Appeals Court incorrectly said that our Tariffs should be removed, but they know the United States of America will win in the end,” he posted. “If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the Country. It would make us financially weak, and we have to be strong.”

Trump suggested his administration would make the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. “For many years, Tariffs were allowed to be used against us by our uncaring and unwise Politicians. Now, with the help of the United States Supreme Court, we will use them to the benefit of our Nation,” he wrote.

However, the senior U.S. government officials are making backup plans. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Monday that he felt confident the Supreme Court will back Trump's use of the IEEPA to impose broad tariffs, but said the administration is working on a Plan B in case it does not.

"I'm confident the Supreme Court will uphold it - will uphold the president's authority to use IEEPA. And there are lots of other authorities that can be used - not as efficient, not as powerful," Bessent said. One of those authorities could be Section 338 of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, he added.

更多精彩内容,关注钛媒体微信号(ID:taimeiti),或者下载钛媒体App

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

特朗普 关税 最高法院 美国贸易政策 Trump Tariffs Supreme Court US Trade Policy
相关文章