少点错误 08月28日
信仰与永生:在神是否存在的前提下,如何选择人生道路
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨了在不同世界观下,人类对信仰、生死以及永恒生命的理解和选择。作者首先引入了理性和宗教信仰的对比,假设了一个神迹显现的场景,强调了在确凿证据面前,人们对宗教真理的接受程度。随后,文章深入分析了两种不同的神学观点:一种是死亡即是意识的终结,另一种则是死后存在永恒的奖惩。在前者下,人们或许会更珍惜当下;而在后者下,为了避免永恒的惩罚,人们可能被迫放弃自我,遵从宗教教义,甚至“出卖灵魂”。文章通过对比,引发读者思考在面对截然不同的宇宙观时,个人选择的动机与后果。

🌟 **世界观的奠基作用:** 文章指出,个体是否相信存在一个干预宇宙的神,是理解世界和人生选择的关键。如果神真实存在并要求遵从特定教义,那么对永生的追求将极大地影响人们的行为和价值观。反之,若死亡意味着意识的终结,那么人生的意义和价值将更多地聚焦于此生此世。

🕊️ **神迹显现与认知转变:** 作者设想了一个所有人都亲眼目睹神迹(如天使降临)的场景,并最终被科学和大众共识确认为宗教(如基督教)是真实存在的。这种情况下,即使是曾经的无神论者,也可能在确凿证据面前改变对现实的认知,并开始权衡如何以符合神意的方式生活以获得永生。

⚖️ **永生诱惑下的个人抉择:** 文章核心探讨了在确信死后有永恒奖惩的情况下,个体可能面临的道德困境。为了获得永生,人们可能需要放弃某些被视为“罪”的欲望或身份认同(如性取向、性别认同),这引发了关于“牺牲自我”以求生存的深刻哲学拷问。作者将此比喻为“卖灵魂”,强调了信仰与真实自我之间的潜在冲突。

🤔 **无神论者的视角与失落感:** 对于原本不信神的人而言,如果被告知世界观是正确的(死亡即终结),他们可能不会面临额外的惩罚,但也会对那些为求永生而改变自己的人感到复杂。这种情况下,他们可能会为失去可能存在的“来世”而感到失落,或在目睹他人因信仰而放弃世俗快乐时,感到一种“贫富差距”般的认知隔阂。

Published on August 27, 2025 11:05 AM GMT

   By and large, I expect that we as a community are somewhere south of a 3 on the Dawkins scale. 

I myself am a 6, I used to be a 2 though. 

     So considering that from our point of view, we inhabit a godless universe, It's very hard for us to see things the same way as an Evangelical Christian ( If any Evangelical Christians are reading this, no hate to you).  Consider how the world would look like for you if you believed that:

    A god who both created, presides over and interferes with the universe exists.This same god has a preferred way of being worshipped and demands obedience with tenants he set forth. All other methods aren't agreeable to him. 

    He will grant eternal life to you should you obey him. If you do not obey him, he will either: (a) Punish you forever, (b) Simply let your consciousness cease to be once you die.   

      I think that for all intents and purposes, the answer to the question in the title changes dramatically depending on whether we live in world (a) or (b).  Let's imagine the following scenario: 

      One day, you sit at home idly scrolling through Lesswrong ( or Reddit ) and you hear the most beautiful choir ever. After ensuring that you weren't hallucinating you head outside and see a cohort of beings that could only be described as angels descending from the sky. The cohort is headed by a swarthy bearded man with long hair clad in a white robe and a crown of thorns. He speaks for days on end, his inital words are lost to time but soon the news vans roll in and he's recorded as the world watches with bated breath...  no one understands him, because very few people actually understand Aramaic. But the experts are summoned and the experts convene and the experts agree that the Evangelical Christians were right. Unprecedented levels of debate, both academic and popular follow. You and hordes of people from around the world watch close and listen intently. You hear every argument and counter argument until you've decided with p(99%), that Christianity is and always has been true. It is now as clear to you as the fact that 2+2=4. It's not just you either, the fact that Christianity is the most accurate way to explain reality becomes apparent to everyone else as well. 

     Of course, you know that you could be persuaded otherwise (that perhaps the creatures you saw were aliens or constructs created by a superintelligent time travelling AI), though for now at least, it seems reasonable to suppose with a high probability that the Evangelical Christians were right. Now what?

    For the wages of sin is death

       Let us consider that there will be no sinner-filled lake of fire awaiting you once you die. Your death will simply be the cessation of your conscious experience. If you were an atheist before the second coming, then your beliefs in this area have not really shifted much. This life will still be the only one you experience. Yet, what if there was a way you could truly attain immortality? And not through cryonics or gene therapy or by losing your mouth and gaining a deep desire to scream but merely by accepting that the swarthy man in white from earlier allowed himself to be tortured and killed to pay the price for your sins which his father ( who is also him) could have simply chosen to forgive. Sounds simple doesn't it? 

      Not so. For you see, he may disagree with you on what should be considered a sin. You may agree with him that it is deeply wrong to kill people or unjustly deceive others but you may not agree that fornication with a consenting partner is a sin. Or that being gay or trans is an affront to god. If you're gay and/or enjoy fornication, you must renounce these desires to be eligible for eternal life. If you're a fulfilled trans woman you must accept that you have been on a doomed path this whole time if you wish to outlive the earth. 

       But would atheists despair at this knowledge... or rejoice? During their transitional period into atheism (assuming they previously believed in an afterlife), many people begin to lament the loss of an afterlife, or rather their belief in one. I myself began to wish that I'd either never been born or been born into an atheist household where I'd have grown up not believing in an afterlife. I'd compare this to being born into an old money family, expecting to inherit incalculable wealth and-oh no, 2nd cousin Wilhemina just squandered the family fortune. Now you're in the poor-house. Contrast this to having been born in the poor house, knowing damn well that you will have to swim upstream, dodging bears of debt. 

      So, if you were told that while you would miss out on a reward, you wouldn't be slapped with any additional penalty... how would you feel? Would you go happily to your end, now knowing that the only consequences for imbibing in copious amounts of worldly pleasures are worldly? Or will this knowledge be bittersweet, for you will doubtlessly see friends giving everything that made them themselves up just because they don't want their worlds to end? Will you be among them? Would you do such things? 

        Would you sell your soul to save it? 

    For the wages of sin is hell

      And what if we consider that there will be a great penalty imposed upon you when you die? That you will burn forever in a great pit of fire that even Dante was far too charitable in his depictions of? That you will rub shoulders with both Hitler and the scores of children who did not believe in the divinity of the white-clad man. Let us assume this was made apparent when the angelic choir descended, and you believe with p(>80%) that eternal torture will await you should you die unrepentant.  What would happen to the world? will we see mass conversion camps and endless cults? What would you do? Would you live harder? knowing that your rebellion will end in failure? Or would you give up everything you are to survive? Will you willingly live an eternity in denial simply because you (understandbly) do not wish to live in fire?

         Would you sell your soul to save it? 

     

     



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

信仰 永生 世界观 哲学 宗教 存在主义 Faith Immortality Worldview Philosophy Religion Existentialism
相关文章