AI News 08月26日
AI发展双重性:创新与泡沫并存
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

人工智能(AI)正以前所未有的速度重塑世界,但其发展伴随着炒作和潜在的泡沫。Day Trading报告指出,AI领域的投资热潮与2000年初的互联网泡沫有相似之处,部分AI公司的估值已远超其实际价值。尽管存在过度乐观和“AI洗稿”现象,但AI的实际应用和基础设施建设也在同步进行。报告强调,AI是一项真实的、具有变革潜力的技术,但投资决策应基于理性分析而非盲目跟风,警惕因市场情绪脱离实际业务而产生的风险。

📈 **AI的真实价值与市场泡沫并存**:报告指出,AI是一项真实的、具有巨大潜力的技术,但当前市场对其存在过度炒作和投机现象,部分公司的估值已脱离实际收益,类似于互联网泡沫时期。这表明AI领域既有实质性的创新,也存在局部的投机性泡沫。

💰 **估值过高与投资风险**:许多AI公司的股票价格远高于其盈利能力,尤其是初创公司,其估值建立在对未来巨额利润的预期之上。然而,截至目前,AI领域的巨额投资(如5600亿美元)与带来的实际增量收入(350亿美元)之间存在巨大差距,这增加了投资风险。

💡 **“AI洗稿”与信息不对称**:部分公司夸大其AI能力以提升市场价值,即“AI洗稿”。这种行为加剧了市场对AI潜力的错误认知,使得投资者难以准确评估公司的真实价值,并可能导致投资决策失误。

📉 **非理性投资与市场脆弱性**: inexperienced investors and FOMO (fear of missing out) are driving up AI valuations, mirroring past speculative bubbles. The lack of skeptical perspectives in the market sentiment makes it vulnerable to sudden corrections if investor confidence wavers. While the S&P 500 has shown surface-level stability, this could be masking underlying fragility.

🌐 **AI作为新工业时代的基础设施**:尽管存在泡沫风险,AI的实际应用和基础设施投资正在大规模进行,尤其在金融、物流和媒体等行业已带来显著的生产力提升。前谷歌CEO埃里克·施密特将AI视为“新工业时代的基础设施”,预示其长期价值将持续显现。

AI’s growing dominance in the world, whether it be reshaping industries’ workflows or influencing investor portfolios, is redefining how society and economies evolve. Of course, the hype and buzz around AI has been and is hard to ignore, but the question is, does this hype often overshadow the real challenges and limitations of AI?

According to a new Day Trading report, the excitement around the AI bubble points to signs of overvaluation reminiscent of the dot-com era. While some areas of AI are genuinely transformative, it’s not all boom or bust, but somewhere in the middle.

Dan Buckley, Chief Analyst at DayTrading.com, believes AI is a genuine technological boom, but it comes with pockets of overhype and speculation along the way. “We’re seeing record capital inflows, sky-high valuations, one-sided sentiment, and investing driven by FOMO before common sense. Yet we’re also seeing real-world use cases for AI and infrastructure investment at an industrial scale,” he said.

“The best framing is generally that AI is a real boom containing localised bubbles, not a mania in the board.”

The question remains – is AI a bubble? A bubble refers to when the price of an asset, like a stock or share, and sometimes, even a whole industry, grows in financial value much higher than its actual worth. This typically happens due to overexcitement and investors “following the crowd,” rather than basing decisions on true factors like demand and profits.

Stocks are overpriced

Currently, a number of AI company prices, including Microsoft and Nvidia, are substantially higher than their actual earnings or sales. Normally, high stock prices are justified by high profits, but the valuations of newer AI companies are, at present, over-inflated as they assume large future profits that may never materialise. This is demonstrated by a significant $560 billion investment into AI by companies over the last two years, but the estimated incremental revenue from such companies is only £35 billion – a considerable $525 billion gap.

AI hype ahead of results

Society as a whole assumes AI will revolutionise just about everything, but Day Trading’s report discovered many companies are not generating enough earnings to warrant such excitement. Investors are pricing vast returns on young technologies in early adoption phases in a “hope” that returns will match their investments. Moreover, many companies are “AI washing,” a tactic to exaggerate their AI capabilities to market themselves as more valuable than perhaps traditional assessment.

Financial risks

Some established global players like Nvidia and Amazon finance their growth through robust cash flows, but many newer AI startups are relying heavily on venture capital or debt funding, thus making them highly vulnerable if funding conditions change. Current enthusiasm around AI can attract emergency funding in some cases, but this reliance on high-risk financing highlights the fragility present in some segments of the AI market.

One-sided optimism

Investor sentiment towards AI is very positive, but also bullish. Sceptical perspectives are rarely acknowledged, which may leave the AI market vulnerable to sudden corrections if confidence is lost. Historically, bubbles tend to coincide with rising volatility, but the S&P 500 has remained relatively calm so far, suggesting surface-level stability. However, this may reflect confidence among investors convinced of AI’s promise.

Inexperienced investors fuelling AI hype?

According to Day Trading, a surge in inexperienced investors jumping on the AI hype bandwagon may be inflating valuations and heightening the risk of sudden corrections. Much like behaviour seen in the dot-com bubble, new buyers are following extant narratives, at present based on social media buzz and news headlines, instead of focusing on current earnings or real value.

Liquidity is keeping the AI infrastructure rolling

Although interest rates are higher compared to pre-pandemic levels, major tech firms have enough liquidity to continue investing heavily in AI without taking too much risk. The ratio of fresh equity or uncertain borrowing remains relatively low.

Speculative stockpiling

Some AI companies, like CoreWeave and Open AI, are aggressively hoarding resources, including AI chips and engineering talent, in anticipation of demand. This creates further financial risk if growth in sales were to slow. With no clear ROI or business models in place, capital is at the mercy of AI growth, or lack of it.

The bubble isn’t burst

Day Trading’s report highlights a range of concerns, similar to the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s and early 2000s. For instance, AI is already being used at scale, delivering productivity gains, particularly in sectors like finance, logistics, and media, something that was not evident in the dot-com era.

Although AI companies claim to be creating real value right now, compared to infrastructure investments being made, only a few are enjoying profitable margins, like Microsoft and Nvidia.

Substantial investments have been made for long term growth, not short term fast return. Therefore, the true returns may yet materialise as AI’s full potential unfolds over time. Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google described, “AI as infrastructure for a new industrial era, not just a passing tech fad.”

Dan Buckley does not think AI is just hype, but excessive optimism can be dangerous. “AI is real and valuable,” Buckley said. “But it’s when market sentiment outpaces real business results that I begin to worry about the gap becoming dangerous for investors.”

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.

Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.

The post AI’s dual nature: Genuine innovation amid localised bubbles appeared first on AI News.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI 人工智能 投资 泡沫 科技 AI hype AI bubble tech investment speculation
相关文章