Drones, Design, and Jobs To Be Done. What is the problem being solved?
Dontcha love design stakeholders? I read about the furore over plans to introduce drone delivery for fast food, café orders, and non-essentials (I couldn’t make it work for prescription medicines) to homes in South County Dublin (B2C, or D2C, if you prefer). The Irish company involved is called Manna (good luck with the international expansion into the Middle East). What could possibly go wrong? Everything, it seems.
Regardless, the question arises: exactly what problem is being solved by home delivery drones? The qualitative data I’ve seen does not support the claim that drones are significantly cheaper or a faster end-to-end delivery solution for fast food consumers.

Clay Christensen’s famous Harvard Business Review “Jobs To Be Done” framework example of the “milkshake hired for the morning commute” showed how the problem being solved for drivers was not hunger, but boredom during the journey.
https://medium.com/media/a496a0d1576fd7cced7bb40debf390f0/hrefCould it be that the problem that home delivery drones solve is not just logistical, but the lack of decent entertainment or novelty in people’s lives? Could it be that the real competitive edge for home delivery drones isn’t against bike delivery or takeaways, but TikTok, Netflix, Spotify, and bouncy castles? The JBTD approach should be looked at. Therein is real disruption, perhaps.
Christensen had his milkshakes. Ireland’s innovators might shake the market up more by exploring what problems drones really solve, more about “drones to be done”, if you like. That’s where user-centred design can help: watch and ask people first.
All Manna of Drone UX Design was originally published in UX Planet on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
