Fortune | FORTUNE 08月21日
CEOs at America’s 100 largest low-wage employers are paid 632 times more than the average worker, study finds
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

一项新报告揭示,美国100家最大的低薪企业CEO薪酬涨幅远超普通员工,CEO平均年薪高达1720万美元,而普通员工仅为35,570美元。CEO与员工的薪酬差距不断扩大,许多公司将巨额资金用于股票回购而非资本投资。报告指出,这种薪酬不平等是财富不平等的体现,并呼吁进行政策改革,如提高高薪酬差距公司的企业税,以缓解这一问题,并强调关注基层员工的福祉对于企业长期价值的重要性。

📈 **CEO薪酬与员工薪酬差距悬殊**:从2019年到2024年,低薪企业100强的CEO平均薪酬增长了34.7%,而普通员工的薪酬增长率仅为16.3%,远低于同期22.6%的通货膨胀率。目前,CEO平均年薪为1720万美元,而普通员工的年薪仅为35,570美元,22家公司普通员工的实际薪酬甚至有所下降。

⚖️ **薪酬差距持续扩大**:CEO与员工的薪酬比率从2019年的560:1飙升至2024年的632:1,远高于S&P 500公司的平均水平。星巴克以6666:1的比例成为极端案例,其CEO年薪高达9580万美元,而中层员工仅为14,674美元。

💸 **股票回购而非投资**:在2019年至2024年间,这100家公司在股票回购上花费了6440亿美元。其中56家公司在股票回购上的支出超过了长期资本投资,例如Lowe’s公司仅股票回购就花费了466亿美元,这笔钱足以给每位员工提供六年、每年28,456美元的奖金。

🏛️ **政策改革呼吁**:报告提出多项政策改革,包括对支付过高CEO薪酬的公司征收更高的企业税,这一提议得到了80%选民的支持。其他建议还包括提高股票回购税、限制接受政府合同或补贴的公司进行股票回购,以及将薪酬比率与联邦采购挂钩。

🤝 **基层员工福祉的重要性**:报告强调,企业应更多地关注占员工总数一半的低薪员工。研究表明,在低薪企业中,如果中层员工的薪酬停滞或下降,往往会导致员工不满情绪增加。关注基层员工的福祉对于驱动企业长期价值至关重要。

A new report from the Institute for Policy Studies reveals that executive compensation at the country’s 100 largest low-wage employers—dubbed the “Low-Wage 100”—has reached unprecedented heights, with CEOs taking home astronomical pay packages while typical workers’ wages stagnate or even decline. This annual “Executive Excess” analysis scrutinizes six years of pay and investment trends at major publicly traded companies, including household names like Starbucks, Walmart, Home Depot, and Amazon.

Key findings

    CEO compensation vs. worker pay: From 2019 to 2024, average CEO pay at Low-Wage 100 firms climbed 34.7%, compared to just a 16.3% rise for their average median worker pay—less than the cumulative 22.6% U.S. inflation over the same period. The average CEO now earns $17.2 million, while the typical worker receives only $35,570 a year. At 22 of these companies, even nominal median pay dropped over six years.Widening pay gaps: The CEO-to-worker pay ratio ballooned 12.9%, from 560:1 in 2019 to 632:1 in 2024—more than double the S&P 500 average. Starbucks set a new record with a staggering 6,666:1 ratio last year, reflecting CEO Brian Niccol’s $95.8 million pay package versus $14,674 for the median employee.Stock buybacks over investment: These 100 companies spent $644 billion on stock buybacks between 2019 and 2024. A majority, 56 firms, invested more in buybacks than in long-term capital improvements, with Lowe’s and Home Depot leading the pack. Lowe’s alone spent $46.6 billion—enough for an annual $28,456 bonus for every employee over six years.Billionaire fortunes: At least 32 U.S. billionaires owe their wealth to these companies, with a combined net worth of $827 billion.Policy solutions and public support: The report outlines numerous policy reforms to rein in excessive executive pay and buybacks, including higher corporate taxes for outsized pay gaps—a proposal supported by 80% of likely voters in a 2024 survey. Other measures include boosting the federal stock buyback excise tax, restricting buybacks for companies accepting government contracts or subsidies, and tying pay ratio benchmarks to federal procurement.

Case studies: stark examples

    Starbucks: Its median worker pay rose just 4.2% in real terms over six years amid mounting unionization drives. The company spent $18.2 billion on buybacks, far outpacing capital investment. Nearly half its employees eligible for 401(k) plans in 2023 had zero savings.Ulta Beauty: The cosmetics retailer saw median pay plummet 46% (to $11,078), as its workforce shifted toward part-time employment. CEO pay surged 45%—now 1,130 times the median. Ulta spent three times as much on buybacks as capital improvements.

The wider context

The CEO-worker pay gap is an issue beyond the Low-Wage 100. Among a broad sample of 50 public companies with revenues over $1 billion, a March 2025 study from Compensation Advisory Partners found a widening split between actual company performance and CEO pay. Median revenue growth collapsed on a year-over-year basis from 3.7% to 1.6% and earnings per share growth dropped from 0.3 to basically zero among the 50 firms, but the companies still issued bumper bonuses to their leaders. The significant boosts averaged a whopping 280% increase, and bonuses were still up by 45% at other firms, Fortune reported.

Two leading academics, Claudio Fernández-Aráoz and Greg Nagel, argued in the pages of Fortune in April that the data is daming. Back in 1965, CEOs earned 21 times more than the average worker; by 2023, this ratio had escalated to 290x. For 100 of the S&P 500 corporations, they noted, this ratio climbed to 603x in 2022. Adjusted for inflation, they found, CEO compensation in large firms increased by 878% from 1978 to 2022, whereas real worker compensation only by 4.5%.

It’s part of a wider story of wealth inequality, certainly in the United States, where the Congressional Budget Office found in late 2024 that the top 10% wealthiest Americans own the majority of assets, and the top 1% controls nearly a third.

There’s a bit of a “perfect storm” in the confluence of shareholder primacy, stock buybacks, and falling corporate tax rates by which “companies have gotten bigger, corporate power is on the rise, and the benefits that they’ve accrued in profit they are funneling to a smaller number of people,” Irit Tamir, senior director of Oxfam America’s private sector department, told Fortune in October 2024.

Legislative action

The IPS report catalogs a sweeping set of reforms already on the legislative agenda in Congress and in cities such as Portland and San Francisco. Proposals range from taxes and contract restrictions for excessive CEO-worker pay gaps to strengthening board accountability, corporate transparency, and shareholder powers. Many measures have drawn strong bipartisan as well as public support.

Ultimately, the Institute for Policy Studies warns that without decisive reform, America’s largest corporations will regret this. The report cited Drew Hambly, the investment director at the country’s largest public penson fund CalPERS, warning of the harmful effects of this imbalance at an SEC roundtable on executive compensation. CalPERS research, he said, finds high levels of worker unrest at low-wage corporations where median worker pay has either remained flat or declined over the past five years. “I want corporate boards to think more about the bottom 50% of people who work for them,” he told the roundtable. “Because when I go into a business, I’m probably interacting with a lower-wage worker. And if you’re going to drive value over time, that’s the face of your company.”

Starbucks, Lowe’s and Ulta Beauty did not respond to requests for comment.

For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. 

Introducing the 2025 Fortune Global 500

, the definitive ranking of the biggest companies in the world.

Explore this year's list.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

CEO薪酬 低薪企业 薪酬差距 股票回购 财富不平等
相关文章