Samaltman 02月10日
Researchers and Founders
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了创始人与研究者这两类人群中的佼佼者所共有的特质。尽管个体差异显著,但他们都在不断反思“Hamming问题”,即思考领域内最重要的问题以及为何自己没有着手解决。他们既专注于眼前的步骤,又具备长远的战略眼光。此外,他们还展现出极强的毅力、行动导向以及对成败的清晰认知。他们是源源不断的创意生成者,重视自主性,并由真正的好奇心所驱动。这些共性为我们理解高效人士的普遍特征提供了宝贵的视角。

🤔 他们会花大量时间反思Hamming问题——“你所在领域最重要的问题是什么,为什么你没有研究它们?”他们拥有敏锐的“问题品味”,这源于独立思考、预测未来和识别切入点的能力。

🎯 他们兼具对当前步骤的专注和对未来的长远眼光。大多数人往往只能顾及其中一个方面,而他们却能巧妙地将两者结合起来。

💪 他们极其坚持不懈且愿意努力工作。这是成功的必要条件,那些声称无需努力就能成功的人往往不可信,除非你愿意拥有他们那样的人生。

💡 他们具有行动导向,勇于尝试,并且对成败有清晰而诚实的认知。他们是富有创造力的想法产生者,即使很多想法可能很糟糕,但他们从不缺乏创意。

🌱 他们非常重视自主性,难以接受他们认为没有意义的规则。他们的动机往往比表面看起来更复杂,通常是由真正的好奇心所驱动的。

I spent many years working with founders and now I work with researchers.

Although there are always individual exceptions, on average it’s surprising to me how different the best people in these groups are (including in some qualities that I had assumed were present in great people everywhere, like very high levels of self-belief).

So I’ve been thinking about the ways they’re the same, because maybe there is something to learn about qualities of really effective people in general.

The best people in both groups spend a lot of time reflecting on some version of the Hamming question—"what are the most important problems in your field, and why aren’t you working on them?” In general, no one reflects on this question enough, but the best people do it the most, and have the best ‘problem taste’, which is some combination of learning to think independently, reason about the future, and identify attack vectors. (This from John Schulman is worth reading: http://joschu.net/blog/opinionated-guide-ml-research.html).

They have a laser focus on the next step in front of them combined with long-term vision. Most people only have one or the other.

They are extremely persistent and willing to work hard. As far as I can tell, there is no high-probability way to be very successful without this, and you should be suspicious of people who tell you otherwise unless you’d be happy having their career (and be especially suspicious if they worked hard themselves).

They have a bias towards action and trying things, and they’re clear-eyed and honest about what is working and what isn’t (importantly, this goes both ways—I’m amazed by how many people will see something working and then not pursue it). 

They are creative idea-generators—a lot of the ideas may be terrible, but there is never a shortage.

They really value autonomy and have a hard time with rules that they don’t think make sense. They are definitely not lemmings.

Their motivations are often more complex than they seem—specifically, they are frequently very driven by genuine curiosity.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

高效人士 创始人 研究者 Hamming问题 自主性
相关文章